联邦法律禁止受到家庭暴力限制令的人持有枪支是否能挽救生命?

IF 3 3区医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES

Health Economics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.22158/elp.v6n3p13

John R. Lott, Jr., Carlisle E. Moody

{"title":"联邦法律禁止受到家庭暴力限制令的人持有枪支是否能挽救生命?","authors":"John R. Lott, Jr., Carlisle E. Moody","doi":"10.22158/elp.v6n3p13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court of the United States will hear arguments concerning Federal Law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) which forbids individuals who are under a Domestic Violence Protection Order (DVPO) from possessing firearms. This paper analyzes the potential costs of overturning that law. We estimate a variety of models to determine the effect of the law on domestic murders, domestic femicides, domestic gun murders, and domestic gun femicides. We subject the analysis to a variety of robustness checks. The results are remarkably robust. We find that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) does not significantly reduce domestic murder, domestic femicide, domestic gun murder, or domestic gun femicide.","PeriodicalId":46836,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Policy and Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Federal Law Forbidding People under Domestic Violence Restraining Orders from Possessing Firearms Save Lives?\",\"authors\":\"John R. Lott, Jr., Carlisle E. Moody\",\"doi\":\"10.22158/elp.v6n3p13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Supreme Court of the United States will hear arguments concerning Federal Law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) which forbids individuals who are under a Domestic Violence Protection Order (DVPO) from possessing firearms. This paper analyzes the potential costs of overturning that law. We estimate a variety of models to determine the effect of the law on domestic murders, domestic femicides, domestic gun murders, and domestic gun femicides. We subject the analysis to a variety of robustness checks. The results are remarkably robust. We find that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) does not significantly reduce domestic murder, domestic femicide, domestic gun murder, or domestic gun femicide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Economics Policy and Law\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Economics Policy and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22158/elp.v6n3p13\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/elp.v6n3p13","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

美国最高法院将听取关于联邦法18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8)的辩论，该法律禁止受家庭暴力保护令(DVPO)保护的个人拥有枪支。本文分析了推翻该法的潜在成本。我们估计了各种模型，以确定法律对家庭谋杀、家庭女性谋杀、家庭枪支谋杀和家庭枪支女性谋杀的影响。我们对分析进行了各种稳健性检查。结果非常可靠。我们发现18 U.S.C.§922(g)(8)并没有显著减少家庭谋杀、家庭女性谋杀、家庭枪支谋杀或家庭枪支女性谋杀。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does the Federal Law Forbidding People under Domestic Violence Restraining Orders from Possessing Firearms Save Lives?

The Supreme Court of the United States will hear arguments concerning Federal Law 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) which forbids individuals who are under a Domestic Violence Protection Order (DVPO) from possessing firearms. This paper analyzes the potential costs of overturning that law. We estimate a variety of models to determine the effect of the law on domestic murders, domestic femicides, domestic gun murders, and domestic gun femicides. We subject the analysis to a variety of robustness checks. The results are remarkably robust. We find that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) does not significantly reduce domestic murder, domestic femicide, domestic gun murder, or domestic gun femicide.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Health Economics Policy and Law HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： International trends highlight the confluence of economics, politics and legal considerations in the health policy process. Health Economics, Policy and Law serves as a forum for scholarship on health policy issues from these perspectives, and is of use to academics, policy makers and health care managers and professionals. HEPL is international in scope, publishes both theoretical and applied work, and contains articles on all aspects of health policy. Considerable emphasis is placed on rigorous conceptual development and analysis, and on the presentation of empirical evidence that is relevant to the policy process.