TUDA-GLR-OpenStage跨声速轴流压气机端壁几何不确定度及性能误差

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Kailong Xia, Xiao He, Mingmin Zhu, Fabian Klausmann, Jinfang Teng, Mehdi Vahdati
{"title":"TUDA-GLR-OpenStage跨声速轴流压气机端壁几何不确定度及性能误差","authors":"Kailong Xia, Xiao He, Mingmin Zhu, Fabian Klausmann, Jinfang Teng, Mehdi Vahdati","doi":"10.33737/jgpps/161708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hub and casing walls of axial compressors are often modeled as smooth continuous surfaces in CFD simulations, but in real geometries, non-smooth pinches, steps and leakage cavities may exist. In the GPPS first Turbomachinery CFD Workshop, a comprehensive validation and verification campaign of RANS flow solvers was conducted, and all the simulation results consistently over-predicted the total pressure ratio at the rotor exit near the casing and the stator exit near the hub. From a recent examination of the test rig geometry, a pinched casing wall over the rotor and a leakage cavity below the stator were found, which were not considered in the workshop. In this paper, the effects of these endwall geometric uncertainties and errors are analyzed via numerical simulation. When considering the rotor casing pinch of the test geometry, the predicted total pressure ratio and choke mass flow of the compressor stage are smaller than that without the pinch, leading to better agreement with the measured data. When considering a stator hub cavity with a leakage flow rate of about 0.2% of the compressor inlet mass flow, the near-hub total pressure ratio distribution matches slightly better with the experimental data, but the effects on the global compressor stage characteristics are not visible. The relevant mechanisms of these changes in performances are analyzed in detail. The updated geometries and grids will be released to the public as a benchmark test case for turbomachinery CFD validation and verification.","PeriodicalId":53002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endwall geometric uncertainty and error on the performance of TUDA-GLR-OpenStage transonic axial compressor\",\"authors\":\"Kailong Xia, Xiao He, Mingmin Zhu, Fabian Klausmann, Jinfang Teng, Mehdi Vahdati\",\"doi\":\"10.33737/jgpps/161708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The hub and casing walls of axial compressors are often modeled as smooth continuous surfaces in CFD simulations, but in real geometries, non-smooth pinches, steps and leakage cavities may exist. In the GPPS first Turbomachinery CFD Workshop, a comprehensive validation and verification campaign of RANS flow solvers was conducted, and all the simulation results consistently over-predicted the total pressure ratio at the rotor exit near the casing and the stator exit near the hub. From a recent examination of the test rig geometry, a pinched casing wall over the rotor and a leakage cavity below the stator were found, which were not considered in the workshop. In this paper, the effects of these endwall geometric uncertainties and errors are analyzed via numerical simulation. When considering the rotor casing pinch of the test geometry, the predicted total pressure ratio and choke mass flow of the compressor stage are smaller than that without the pinch, leading to better agreement with the measured data. When considering a stator hub cavity with a leakage flow rate of about 0.2% of the compressor inlet mass flow, the near-hub total pressure ratio distribution matches slightly better with the experimental data, but the effects on the global compressor stage characteristics are not visible. The relevant mechanisms of these changes in performances are analyzed in detail. The updated geometries and grids will be released to the public as a benchmark test case for turbomachinery CFD validation and verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33737/jgpps/161708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33737/jgpps/161708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在CFD模拟中,轴向压气机的轮毂和机匣壁通常被建模为光滑的连续表面,但在实际几何中,可能存在非光滑的挤压、台阶和泄漏腔。在GPPS第一届涡轮机械CFD研讨会上,对RANS流动求解器进行了全面的验证和验证,所有仿真结果都一致高估了机匣附近转子出口和轮毂附近定子出口的总压比。从最近对试验台几何形状的检查中,发现转子上方夹紧的机匣壁和定子下方的泄漏腔,这在车间中没有考虑到。本文通过数值模拟分析了这些端壁几何不确定性和误差的影响。考虑试验几何形状的转子机匣夹紧时,压气机级的预测总压比和节流质量流量均小于未考虑夹紧时,与实测数据吻合较好。当泄漏流量约为压气机进口质量流量的0.2%时,定子轮毂空腔的近轮毂总压比分布与实验数据吻合稍好,但对压气机级整体特性的影响不明显。详细分析了这些性能变化的相关机制。更新后的几何形状和网格将作为涡轮机械CFD验证和验证的基准测试案例向公众发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endwall geometric uncertainty and error on the performance of TUDA-GLR-OpenStage transonic axial compressor
The hub and casing walls of axial compressors are often modeled as smooth continuous surfaces in CFD simulations, but in real geometries, non-smooth pinches, steps and leakage cavities may exist. In the GPPS first Turbomachinery CFD Workshop, a comprehensive validation and verification campaign of RANS flow solvers was conducted, and all the simulation results consistently over-predicted the total pressure ratio at the rotor exit near the casing and the stator exit near the hub. From a recent examination of the test rig geometry, a pinched casing wall over the rotor and a leakage cavity below the stator were found, which were not considered in the workshop. In this paper, the effects of these endwall geometric uncertainties and errors are analyzed via numerical simulation. When considering the rotor casing pinch of the test geometry, the predicted total pressure ratio and choke mass flow of the compressor stage are smaller than that without the pinch, leading to better agreement with the measured data. When considering a stator hub cavity with a leakage flow rate of about 0.2% of the compressor inlet mass flow, the near-hub total pressure ratio distribution matches slightly better with the experimental data, but the effects on the global compressor stage characteristics are not visible. The relevant mechanisms of these changes in performances are analyzed in detail. The updated geometries and grids will be released to the public as a benchmark test case for turbomachinery CFD validation and verification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society
Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信