幼儿教师教育课程设计的跨文化研究

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yuan He, Ting Li, Azra Fanoos, Tynjälä Päivi
{"title":"幼儿教师教育课程设计的跨文化研究","authors":"Yuan He, Ting Li, Azra Fanoos, Tynjälä Päivi","doi":"10.1177/17454999231212548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was an attempt to compare the distinctive features in current Early Childhood Teacher Education (ECTE) curricula conducted at two universities, one in China, and one in the US. Document reviews, interviews, and questionnaires shed light on the two different approaches to curriculum design. Two program directors and 25 participants, viewed as “cultural outsiders,” were recruited. Results showed that the US model could be viewed as “deep” learning while the Chinese model was seen as “broad” learning. The US ECTE curriculum focused on a robust connection between general education and professional courses, strong standards, content-centered professional courses, multiple cultures, and more credit for field experience. The ECTE curriculum at the Chinese university provided a wide variety of general education and professional courses, arts-related professional courses, national cultures, and more modalities for field experience. This study also examined the impact of culture and society on the ECTE curriculum design.","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"1 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural research on early childhood teacher education curriculum design\",\"authors\":\"Yuan He, Ting Li, Azra Fanoos, Tynjälä Päivi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17454999231212548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was an attempt to compare the distinctive features in current Early Childhood Teacher Education (ECTE) curricula conducted at two universities, one in China, and one in the US. Document reviews, interviews, and questionnaires shed light on the two different approaches to curriculum design. Two program directors and 25 participants, viewed as “cultural outsiders,” were recruited. Results showed that the US model could be viewed as “deep” learning while the Chinese model was seen as “broad” learning. The US ECTE curriculum focused on a robust connection between general education and professional courses, strong standards, content-centered professional courses, multiple cultures, and more credit for field experience. The ECTE curriculum at the Chinese university provided a wide variety of general education and professional courses, arts-related professional courses, national cultures, and more modalities for field experience. This study also examined the impact of culture and society on the ECTE curriculum design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"volume\":\"1 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231212548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999231212548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较中国和美国两所大学目前开展的幼儿教师教育(ECTE)课程的特点。文献回顾、访谈和问卷调查揭示了两种不同的课程设计方法。招募了两名项目主管和25名参与者,他们被视为“文化局外人”。结果表明,美国模式可以被视为“深度”学习,而中国模式可以被视为“广泛”学习。美国ECTE课程注重通识教育和专业课程之间的紧密联系、严格的标准、以内容为中心的专业课程、多元文化以及更多的实地经验学分。中国大学的ECTE课程提供了广泛的通识教育和专业课程,艺术相关的专业课程,民族文化以及更多的实地体验模式。本研究亦探讨了文化和社会因素对ECTE课程设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural research on early childhood teacher education curriculum design
This study was an attempt to compare the distinctive features in current Early Childhood Teacher Education (ECTE) curricula conducted at two universities, one in China, and one in the US. Document reviews, interviews, and questionnaires shed light on the two different approaches to curriculum design. Two program directors and 25 participants, viewed as “cultural outsiders,” were recruited. Results showed that the US model could be viewed as “deep” learning while the Chinese model was seen as “broad” learning. The US ECTE curriculum focused on a robust connection between general education and professional courses, strong standards, content-centered professional courses, multiple cultures, and more credit for field experience. The ECTE curriculum at the Chinese university provided a wide variety of general education and professional courses, arts-related professional courses, national cultures, and more modalities for field experience. This study also examined the impact of culture and society on the ECTE curriculum design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Comparative and International Education
Research in Comparative and International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信