Tesfu F Tujuba, Anna Simonetto, Gianni Gilioli, Andrea Sciarretta
{"title":"以鳞翅目为工具评价人为干扰对埃塞俄比亚呛山生态和分类多样性的影响","authors":"Tesfu F Tujuba, Anna Simonetto, Gianni Gilioli, Andrea Sciarretta","doi":"10.1080/15627020.2023.2260835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn tropical countries, frequent anthropogenic disturbances are primary drivers of the reduction in community diversity and local extinction of many insect taxa, including Lepidoptera. We assessed the impact of anthropogenic disturbances on lepidopteran assemblages across five different land use types (Fragmented Forest, Crop Fields, Pasture Land, Rural Settlements and undisturbed Natural Forest) in the Choke Mountains, Ethiopia. Lepidoptera were sampled using 20 W UV LED lights in 19 sites for 12 consecutive months. A total of 4 559 specimens representing 14 families and 339 species were sampled. The highest diversity was obtained from the Natural Forest, followed by the Fragmented Forest, Rural Settlements, Pasture Land and Crop Fields. The monthly trends of the diversity estimates showed strong differences among the five land use types, with months when the highest Hill–Shannon and Hill– Simpson values were observed not in the Natural Forest, but in the Rural Settlements and Fragmented Forest. The highest dominance values were observed in the Crop Fields and Pasture Land, with dominant species percentages of about 10%. The multivariate results clearly highlight the separation of the Natural Forest sites from all other sites and, in general, great consistency within each land use. A high positive linear relationship between the number of vascular plants and sampled Lepidoptera species was observed. The results of this study will be useful for guiding conservation management priorities to prevent irreversible biodiversity loss and maintain ecosystem provisioning services that are essential for the sustainable development of rural communities.Keywords: mothsAfricaland useecosystem monitoringdiversity measures","PeriodicalId":55548,"journal":{"name":"African Zoology","volume":"17 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lepidoptera as a tool for the assessment of human disturbance impacting ecological and taxonomic diversity in the Choke Mountains, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Tesfu F Tujuba, Anna Simonetto, Gianni Gilioli, Andrea Sciarretta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15627020.2023.2260835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIn tropical countries, frequent anthropogenic disturbances are primary drivers of the reduction in community diversity and local extinction of many insect taxa, including Lepidoptera. We assessed the impact of anthropogenic disturbances on lepidopteran assemblages across five different land use types (Fragmented Forest, Crop Fields, Pasture Land, Rural Settlements and undisturbed Natural Forest) in the Choke Mountains, Ethiopia. Lepidoptera were sampled using 20 W UV LED lights in 19 sites for 12 consecutive months. A total of 4 559 specimens representing 14 families and 339 species were sampled. The highest diversity was obtained from the Natural Forest, followed by the Fragmented Forest, Rural Settlements, Pasture Land and Crop Fields. The monthly trends of the diversity estimates showed strong differences among the five land use types, with months when the highest Hill–Shannon and Hill– Simpson values were observed not in the Natural Forest, but in the Rural Settlements and Fragmented Forest. The highest dominance values were observed in the Crop Fields and Pasture Land, with dominant species percentages of about 10%. The multivariate results clearly highlight the separation of the Natural Forest sites from all other sites and, in general, great consistency within each land use. A high positive linear relationship between the number of vascular plants and sampled Lepidoptera species was observed. The results of this study will be useful for guiding conservation management priorities to prevent irreversible biodiversity loss and maintain ecosystem provisioning services that are essential for the sustainable development of rural communities.Keywords: mothsAfricaland useecosystem monitoringdiversity measures\",\"PeriodicalId\":55548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Zoology\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2023.2260835\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2023.2260835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lepidoptera as a tool for the assessment of human disturbance impacting ecological and taxonomic diversity in the Choke Mountains, Ethiopia
AbstractIn tropical countries, frequent anthropogenic disturbances are primary drivers of the reduction in community diversity and local extinction of many insect taxa, including Lepidoptera. We assessed the impact of anthropogenic disturbances on lepidopteran assemblages across five different land use types (Fragmented Forest, Crop Fields, Pasture Land, Rural Settlements and undisturbed Natural Forest) in the Choke Mountains, Ethiopia. Lepidoptera were sampled using 20 W UV LED lights in 19 sites for 12 consecutive months. A total of 4 559 specimens representing 14 families and 339 species were sampled. The highest diversity was obtained from the Natural Forest, followed by the Fragmented Forest, Rural Settlements, Pasture Land and Crop Fields. The monthly trends of the diversity estimates showed strong differences among the five land use types, with months when the highest Hill–Shannon and Hill– Simpson values were observed not in the Natural Forest, but in the Rural Settlements and Fragmented Forest. The highest dominance values were observed in the Crop Fields and Pasture Land, with dominant species percentages of about 10%. The multivariate results clearly highlight the separation of the Natural Forest sites from all other sites and, in general, great consistency within each land use. A high positive linear relationship between the number of vascular plants and sampled Lepidoptera species was observed. The results of this study will be useful for guiding conservation management priorities to prevent irreversible biodiversity loss and maintain ecosystem provisioning services that are essential for the sustainable development of rural communities.Keywords: mothsAfricaland useecosystem monitoringdiversity measures
期刊介绍:
African Zoology , a peer-reviewed research journal, publishes original scientific contributions and critical reviews that focus principally on African fauna in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems. Research from other regions that advances practical and theoretical aspects of zoology will be considered. Rigorous question-driven research in all aspects of zoology will take precedence over descriptive research. The Journal publishes full-length papers, critical reviews, short communications, letters to the editors as well as book reviews. Contributions based on purely observational, descriptive or anecdotal data will not be considered.
The Journal is produced by NISC in association with the Zoological Society of South Africa (ZSSA). Acceptance of papers is the responsibility of the Editors-in-Chief in consultation with the Editors and members of the Editorial Advisory Board. All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Editors or the Department.