{"title":"南非荷兰语动词缩略语中的 \"univerbation \"现象","authors":"Cora Cavirani-Pots, Engela De Villiers","doi":"10.1075/avt.00077.cav","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper concerns the verbal diminutive suffixes -el and -er in Afrikaans. In previous work ( Cavirani-Pots et al. 2023 ), these suffixes have been analysed on par with their Dutch counterparts. In this paper we present the results of a nonsense word experiment on these suffixes in Afrikaans (94 participants) and Dutch (242 participants). The results show that the Afrikaans participants significantly underperform in guessing the meaning of these suffixes compared to the Dutch participants. We take this to mean that the underlying structure of verbs containing these suffixes is different in the two languages. Based on the three-way division of affix types of Creemers et al. (2018) , we follow Cavirani-Pots et al. (2023) ’s analysis of the Dutch -el and -er suffixes as being level Ia suffixes, i.e. suffixes that appear right above the stem they attach to. For Afrikaans, however, we propose that -el and -er have lost their suffixal status, and have undergone univerbation with the stem.","PeriodicalId":35138,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","volume":"48 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Univerbation in Afrikaans verbal diminutives\",\"authors\":\"Cora Cavirani-Pots, Engela De Villiers\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/avt.00077.cav\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper concerns the verbal diminutive suffixes -el and -er in Afrikaans. In previous work ( Cavirani-Pots et al. 2023 ), these suffixes have been analysed on par with their Dutch counterparts. In this paper we present the results of a nonsense word experiment on these suffixes in Afrikaans (94 participants) and Dutch (242 participants). The results show that the Afrikaans participants significantly underperform in guessing the meaning of these suffixes compared to the Dutch participants. We take this to mean that the underlying structure of verbs containing these suffixes is different in the two languages. Based on the three-way division of affix types of Creemers et al. (2018) , we follow Cavirani-Pots et al. (2023) ’s analysis of the Dutch -el and -er suffixes as being level Ia suffixes, i.e. suffixes that appear right above the stem they attach to. For Afrikaans, however, we propose that -el and -er have lost their suffixal status, and have undergone univerbation with the stem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"volume\":\"48 20\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00077.cav\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00077.cav","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文研究了南非荷兰语的动词小后缀-el和-er。在之前的工作中(Cavirani-Pots et al. 2023),这些后缀已经与荷兰的对应词进行了同等的分析。在本文中,我们介绍了对南非荷兰语(94名参与者)和荷兰语(242名参与者)的这些后缀进行的无意义词实验的结果。结果显示,与荷兰人相比,南非荷兰人在猜测这些后缀的意思方面表现得明显不如荷兰人。我们认为这意味着两种语言中包含这些后缀的动词的基本结构是不同的。基于Creemers等人(2018)对词缀类型的三向划分,我们遵循Cavirani-Pots等人(2023)对荷兰语-el和-er后缀作为Ia级后缀的分析,即出现在它们所附着的词干正上方的后缀。然而,对于南非荷兰语,我们认为-el和-er已经失去了它们的后缀地位,并与词干一起经历了统一。
Abstract This paper concerns the verbal diminutive suffixes -el and -er in Afrikaans. In previous work ( Cavirani-Pots et al. 2023 ), these suffixes have been analysed on par with their Dutch counterparts. In this paper we present the results of a nonsense word experiment on these suffixes in Afrikaans (94 participants) and Dutch (242 participants). The results show that the Afrikaans participants significantly underperform in guessing the meaning of these suffixes compared to the Dutch participants. We take this to mean that the underlying structure of verbs containing these suffixes is different in the two languages. Based on the three-way division of affix types of Creemers et al. (2018) , we follow Cavirani-Pots et al. (2023) ’s analysis of the Dutch -el and -er suffixes as being level Ia suffixes, i.e. suffixes that appear right above the stem they attach to. For Afrikaans, however, we propose that -el and -er have lost their suffixal status, and have undergone univerbation with the stem.
期刊介绍:
Linguistics in the Netherlands is a series of annual publications, sponsored by the Dutch Linguistics Association (Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschap) and published by John Benjamins Publishing Company since Volume 8 in 1991. Each volume contains a careful selection through peer review of papers presented at the annual meeting of the society. The aim of the annual meeting is to provide members with an opportunity to report on their work in progress. Each volume presents an overview of research in different fields of linguistics in the Netherlands containing articles on phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics.