{"title":"行星秩序的利益:暴力、法律、空间,&;19世纪欧洲外交史上的首都","authors":"Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract If Derrida once praised English for the richness of the expression “to enforce the law,” in this article I return the favor and embrace the ambiguity of the French word endroit . While it means nothing more than place , I suggest one could draw from Benjamin’s work on dwelling to ponder on the meaning of being within the spaces of 19 th century (counter) revolutionary internationalism. In this vein, I read Benjamin’s unfinished Arcades Project —and, in particular, its analysis of the rise of iron & glass architecture that accompanied the conquering bourgeois and the persistent aristocracy—to analyze the new built environments of the fin de siècle North Atlantic diplomacy. Despite the growing interest in the history of global governance, for historians and critical legal scholars alike, the spatial dimension of “the international” have been a largely unexplored affair. Conversely, I suggest Benjamin’s insistence on the materiality of architecture reminds us that international law’s castles were not built solely in the air. In this vein, I suggest one can trace a material history of the spaces in which revolutionary and counterrevolutionary internationalisms struggled to fashion a shell for themselves during Europe’s turbulent 19 th century.","PeriodicalId":36303,"journal":{"name":"German Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Endroits</i> of Planetary Ordering: Violence, Law, Space, & Capital in the Diplomatic History of 19<sup>th</sup> Century Europe\",\"authors\":\"Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/glj.2023.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract If Derrida once praised English for the richness of the expression “to enforce the law,” in this article I return the favor and embrace the ambiguity of the French word endroit . While it means nothing more than place , I suggest one could draw from Benjamin’s work on dwelling to ponder on the meaning of being within the spaces of 19 th century (counter) revolutionary internationalism. In this vein, I read Benjamin’s unfinished Arcades Project —and, in particular, its analysis of the rise of iron & glass architecture that accompanied the conquering bourgeois and the persistent aristocracy—to analyze the new built environments of the fin de siècle North Atlantic diplomacy. Despite the growing interest in the history of global governance, for historians and critical legal scholars alike, the spatial dimension of “the international” have been a largely unexplored affair. Conversely, I suggest Benjamin’s insistence on the materiality of architecture reminds us that international law’s castles were not built solely in the air. In this vein, I suggest one can trace a material history of the spaces in which revolutionary and counterrevolutionary internationalisms struggled to fashion a shell for themselves during Europe’s turbulent 19 th century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
如果说德里达曾称赞英语中“to enforcement the law”一词的丰富性,那么在本文中,我也同样赞扬了法语单词endroit的含混性。虽然它的意思只不过是地方,但我建议人们可以从本雅明关于居住的著作中吸取教训,思考处于19世纪(反革命)国际主义空间中的意义。本着这种精神,我读了本雅明未完成的《拱廊计划》——尤其是它对钢铁崛起的分析。伴随着征服的资产阶级和坚持不懈的贵族的玻璃建筑——分析最后一刻北大西洋外交的新建筑环境。尽管人们对全球治理的历史越来越感兴趣,但对于历史学家和批判性法律学者来说,“国际”的空间维度在很大程度上是一个未被探索的事情。相反,我认为本雅明对建筑物质性的坚持提醒我们,国际法的城堡并不仅仅是建在空中的。在这种脉络下,我建议人们可以追溯革命和反革命国际主义在欧洲动荡的19世纪挣扎着为自己打造外壳的空间的物质历史。
Endroits of Planetary Ordering: Violence, Law, Space, & Capital in the Diplomatic History of 19th Century Europe
Abstract If Derrida once praised English for the richness of the expression “to enforce the law,” in this article I return the favor and embrace the ambiguity of the French word endroit . While it means nothing more than place , I suggest one could draw from Benjamin’s work on dwelling to ponder on the meaning of being within the spaces of 19 th century (counter) revolutionary internationalism. In this vein, I read Benjamin’s unfinished Arcades Project —and, in particular, its analysis of the rise of iron & glass architecture that accompanied the conquering bourgeois and the persistent aristocracy—to analyze the new built environments of the fin de siècle North Atlantic diplomacy. Despite the growing interest in the history of global governance, for historians and critical legal scholars alike, the spatial dimension of “the international” have been a largely unexplored affair. Conversely, I suggest Benjamin’s insistence on the materiality of architecture reminds us that international law’s castles were not built solely in the air. In this vein, I suggest one can trace a material history of the spaces in which revolutionary and counterrevolutionary internationalisms struggled to fashion a shell for themselves during Europe’s turbulent 19 th century.