提高骑自行车者在致命车祸中的生存时间:通过可解释的机器学习研究更快的车祸通知时间的影响

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Iman Mahdinia, Nastaran Moradloo, Amin Mohammadnazar, Asad Khattak
{"title":"提高骑自行车者在致命车祸中的生存时间:通过可解释的机器学习研究更快的车祸通知时间的影响","authors":"Iman Mahdinia, Nastaran Moradloo, Amin Mohammadnazar, Asad Khattak","doi":"10.1080/19439962.2023.2276195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBicyclists are recognized as vulnerable road users, with the escalating fatalities posing a safety concern. While fatal crashes involving bicyclists are often assumed to be similar, there is a crucial distinction between instant death and death occurring several days later, with the former being substantially more severe. This study delves into the analysis of bicyclists’ time-to-death, spanning from immediate fatalities to deaths within 30 days, using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System from 2015 to 2019. Employing the Haddon Matrix approach, the variables are categorized into pre-crash, during-crash, and postcrash phases. This study considers crash notification time as the key postcrash measure. An explainable XGBoost model is developed using the SHAP technique to investigate the associations between variables and bicyclist time-to-death. The results show that substantial delays in crash notification time considerably reduce bicyclists’ time-to-death and increase the likelihood of early death. Specifically, hit-and-run crashes, crashes in rural areas, and crashes during late-night hours exhibit notably longer crash notification times compared to non-hit-and-run crashes, urban areas, and other hours, respectively. In such cases, when no witnesses or survivors can notify emergency responders, on-road vehicle technologies like the advanced automatic collision notification system can promptly inform responders, reducing notification delays.Keywords: bicyclist time-to-deathcrash notification timeexplainable machine learningXGBoostSHAP value AcknowledgementsThe authors express their gratitude for the financial support that enabled the research, authorship, and publication of this article. Specifically, this project received partial funding from the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation through the Collaborative Sciences Center for Road Safety (Grant No. 69A3551747113). It is important to note that the views presented in this paper are solely those of the authors, who bear responsibility for the content of this publication.Disclosure statementThe authors report no declarations of interest.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in FARS at https://www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/fatality-analysis-reporting-system-fars.","PeriodicalId":46672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","volume":"41 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing bicyclist survival time in fatal crashes: Investigating the impact of faster crash notification time through explainable machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Iman Mahdinia, Nastaran Moradloo, Amin Mohammadnazar, Asad Khattak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439962.2023.2276195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractBicyclists are recognized as vulnerable road users, with the escalating fatalities posing a safety concern. While fatal crashes involving bicyclists are often assumed to be similar, there is a crucial distinction between instant death and death occurring several days later, with the former being substantially more severe. This study delves into the analysis of bicyclists’ time-to-death, spanning from immediate fatalities to deaths within 30 days, using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System from 2015 to 2019. Employing the Haddon Matrix approach, the variables are categorized into pre-crash, during-crash, and postcrash phases. This study considers crash notification time as the key postcrash measure. An explainable XGBoost model is developed using the SHAP technique to investigate the associations between variables and bicyclist time-to-death. The results show that substantial delays in crash notification time considerably reduce bicyclists’ time-to-death and increase the likelihood of early death. Specifically, hit-and-run crashes, crashes in rural areas, and crashes during late-night hours exhibit notably longer crash notification times compared to non-hit-and-run crashes, urban areas, and other hours, respectively. In such cases, when no witnesses or survivors can notify emergency responders, on-road vehicle technologies like the advanced automatic collision notification system can promptly inform responders, reducing notification delays.Keywords: bicyclist time-to-deathcrash notification timeexplainable machine learningXGBoostSHAP value AcknowledgementsThe authors express their gratitude for the financial support that enabled the research, authorship, and publication of this article. Specifically, this project received partial funding from the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation through the Collaborative Sciences Center for Road Safety (Grant No. 69A3551747113). It is important to note that the views presented in this paper are solely those of the authors, who bear responsibility for the content of this publication.Disclosure statementThe authors report no declarations of interest.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in FARS at https://www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/fatality-analysis-reporting-system-fars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2023.2276195\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2023.2276195","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要骑自行车的人被认为是弱势的道路使用者,不断上升的死亡事故引起了人们对安全问题的关注。虽然涉及骑自行车者的致命车祸通常被认为是相似的,但即时死亡和几天后发生的死亡之间有一个关键的区别,前者要严重得多。本研究使用2015年至2019年死亡分析报告系统的数据,深入分析了骑自行车者的死亡时间,从立即死亡到30天内死亡。采用Haddon矩阵方法,将变量分为崩溃前、崩溃期间和崩溃后阶段。本研究将崩溃通知时间作为关键的崩溃后度量。使用SHAP技术开发了一个可解释的XGBoost模型,以研究变量与骑自行车者死亡时间之间的关系。结果表明,碰撞通知时间的大幅延迟大大减少了骑自行车者的死亡时间,并增加了早期死亡的可能性。具体来说,肇事逃逸事故、农村地区的事故和深夜发生的事故分别比非肇事逃逸事故、城市地区和其他时间的事故通知时间要长得多。在这种情况下,当没有目击者或幸存者可以通知紧急救援人员时,像先进的自动碰撞通知系统这样的道路车辆技术可以及时通知响应者,减少通知延迟。关键词:骑自行车的人死亡时间碰撞通知时间可解释的机器学习xgboostshap值感谢作者对本文的研究、创作和发表提供的资金支持。具体来说,该项目通过道路安全合作科学中心获得了田纳西州交通部和美国交通部的部分资助(批准号:69A3551747113)。重要的是要注意,本文中提出的观点仅代表作者的观点,作者对本出版物的内容负责。披露声明作者无利益声明。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可在FARS网站https://www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/fatality-analysis-reporting-system-fars上公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing bicyclist survival time in fatal crashes: Investigating the impact of faster crash notification time through explainable machine learning
AbstractBicyclists are recognized as vulnerable road users, with the escalating fatalities posing a safety concern. While fatal crashes involving bicyclists are often assumed to be similar, there is a crucial distinction between instant death and death occurring several days later, with the former being substantially more severe. This study delves into the analysis of bicyclists’ time-to-death, spanning from immediate fatalities to deaths within 30 days, using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System from 2015 to 2019. Employing the Haddon Matrix approach, the variables are categorized into pre-crash, during-crash, and postcrash phases. This study considers crash notification time as the key postcrash measure. An explainable XGBoost model is developed using the SHAP technique to investigate the associations between variables and bicyclist time-to-death. The results show that substantial delays in crash notification time considerably reduce bicyclists’ time-to-death and increase the likelihood of early death. Specifically, hit-and-run crashes, crashes in rural areas, and crashes during late-night hours exhibit notably longer crash notification times compared to non-hit-and-run crashes, urban areas, and other hours, respectively. In such cases, when no witnesses or survivors can notify emergency responders, on-road vehicle technologies like the advanced automatic collision notification system can promptly inform responders, reducing notification delays.Keywords: bicyclist time-to-deathcrash notification timeexplainable machine learningXGBoostSHAP value AcknowledgementsThe authors express their gratitude for the financial support that enabled the research, authorship, and publication of this article. Specifically, this project received partial funding from the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation through the Collaborative Sciences Center for Road Safety (Grant No. 69A3551747113). It is important to note that the views presented in this paper are solely those of the authors, who bear responsibility for the content of this publication.Disclosure statementThe authors report no declarations of interest.Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in FARS at https://www.nhtsa.gov/research-data/fatality-analysis-reporting-system-fars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信