{"title":"表征用于风险评估的神经毒性化学品的新方法方法:四种神经毒性农药的案例研究","authors":"Marilyn Silva","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2258985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractNeurotoxic pesticides: Cyfluthrin (CYF), βCYF, endosulfan (ENDO) and chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPFO) were examined using new approach methodologies (NAM) to assess ToxCast in vitro neurotoxic assay activities (50% concentration–AC50s), chemical-target specificity (Z-Scores) and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation with ToxCast assay AC50s as inputs to calculate human Administered Equivalent Dose (AEDHuman mg/kg) through Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE) models. Fold differences (FD) between AEDHuman NAM predictions and adjusted (animal to human interspecies extrapolation) in vivo regulatory neurotoxicity points of departure (POD) were calculated to assess modeled predictions against measured in vivo data. Interspecies (animal to human) in vivo adjusted PODs were 0.147 mg/kg/d (CYF/βCYF), 0.180 mg/kg/d (ENDO) and 0.106 mg/kg/d (CPFO). ToxCast neurotoxicity assay results supported in vivo observations: CYF, βCYF and CPFO showed depressed neuroactivity, while ENDO showed increased neuroactivity. βCYF is known to have twice the toxicity of CYF in vivo but was less toxic in the in vitro assays. Percent assays with Z-Scores greater than 3 for CYF, βCYF, ENDO and CPFO were 100%, 100%, 67% and 71% respectively. Most AEDHuman were less than 10-FD indicating good predictivity of the in vivo adjusted PODs with ICE models. The NAMs were useful for characterizing the main neurotoxic activities and the ICE models were highly predictive of in vivo PODs to support mechanisms in risk assessment.Keywords: New approach methodologiesToxCastintegrated chemical environmentneurotoxic pesticides AcknowledgmentsI want to thank Dr. Eric Kwok Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency for technical support for this project and Dr. Poorni Iyer, PhD, DABT Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency for help reviewing this work.Authors’ contributionsI am the sole author of this work.Disclosure statementThe author declares that he has no actual or potential competing conflict of interests.","PeriodicalId":13118,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New approach methodologies (NAM) to characterize neurotoxic chemicals for use in risk assessment: case study of four neurotoxic pesticides\",\"authors\":\"Marilyn Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10807039.2023.2258985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractNeurotoxic pesticides: Cyfluthrin (CYF), βCYF, endosulfan (ENDO) and chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPFO) were examined using new approach methodologies (NAM) to assess ToxCast in vitro neurotoxic assay activities (50% concentration–AC50s), chemical-target specificity (Z-Scores) and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation with ToxCast assay AC50s as inputs to calculate human Administered Equivalent Dose (AEDHuman mg/kg) through Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE) models. Fold differences (FD) between AEDHuman NAM predictions and adjusted (animal to human interspecies extrapolation) in vivo regulatory neurotoxicity points of departure (POD) were calculated to assess modeled predictions against measured in vivo data. Interspecies (animal to human) in vivo adjusted PODs were 0.147 mg/kg/d (CYF/βCYF), 0.180 mg/kg/d (ENDO) and 0.106 mg/kg/d (CPFO). ToxCast neurotoxicity assay results supported in vivo observations: CYF, βCYF and CPFO showed depressed neuroactivity, while ENDO showed increased neuroactivity. βCYF is known to have twice the toxicity of CYF in vivo but was less toxic in the in vitro assays. Percent assays with Z-Scores greater than 3 for CYF, βCYF, ENDO and CPFO were 100%, 100%, 67% and 71% respectively. Most AEDHuman were less than 10-FD indicating good predictivity of the in vivo adjusted PODs with ICE models. The NAMs were useful for characterizing the main neurotoxic activities and the ICE models were highly predictive of in vivo PODs to support mechanisms in risk assessment.Keywords: New approach methodologiesToxCastintegrated chemical environmentneurotoxic pesticides AcknowledgmentsI want to thank Dr. Eric Kwok Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency for technical support for this project and Dr. Poorni Iyer, PhD, DABT Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency for help reviewing this work.Authors’ contributionsI am the sole author of this work.Disclosure statementThe author declares that he has no actual or potential competing conflict of interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2258985\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2258985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
New approach methodologies (NAM) to characterize neurotoxic chemicals for use in risk assessment: case study of four neurotoxic pesticides
AbstractNeurotoxic pesticides: Cyfluthrin (CYF), βCYF, endosulfan (ENDO) and chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPFO) were examined using new approach methodologies (NAM) to assess ToxCast in vitro neurotoxic assay activities (50% concentration–AC50s), chemical-target specificity (Z-Scores) and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation with ToxCast assay AC50s as inputs to calculate human Administered Equivalent Dose (AEDHuman mg/kg) through Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE) models. Fold differences (FD) between AEDHuman NAM predictions and adjusted (animal to human interspecies extrapolation) in vivo regulatory neurotoxicity points of departure (POD) were calculated to assess modeled predictions against measured in vivo data. Interspecies (animal to human) in vivo adjusted PODs were 0.147 mg/kg/d (CYF/βCYF), 0.180 mg/kg/d (ENDO) and 0.106 mg/kg/d (CPFO). ToxCast neurotoxicity assay results supported in vivo observations: CYF, βCYF and CPFO showed depressed neuroactivity, while ENDO showed increased neuroactivity. βCYF is known to have twice the toxicity of CYF in vivo but was less toxic in the in vitro assays. Percent assays with Z-Scores greater than 3 for CYF, βCYF, ENDO and CPFO were 100%, 100%, 67% and 71% respectively. Most AEDHuman were less than 10-FD indicating good predictivity of the in vivo adjusted PODs with ICE models. The NAMs were useful for characterizing the main neurotoxic activities and the ICE models were highly predictive of in vivo PODs to support mechanisms in risk assessment.Keywords: New approach methodologiesToxCastintegrated chemical environmentneurotoxic pesticides AcknowledgmentsI want to thank Dr. Eric Kwok Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency for technical support for this project and Dr. Poorni Iyer, PhD, DABT Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency for help reviewing this work.Authors’ contributionsI am the sole author of this work.Disclosure statementThe author declares that he has no actual or potential competing conflict of interests.
期刊介绍:
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment provides a resource for professionals researching and assessing environmental hazards to both humans and ecological systems. The editors expect papers published to be original, of sound science, purposeful for risk analysis (assessment, communication, management) and related areas, well written (in English), and a contribution to the scientific literature.
The journal''s emphasis is on publication of papers that contribute to improvements in human and ecological health. The journal is an international, fully peer-reviewed publication that publishes eight issues annually. The journal''s scope includes scientific and technical information and critical analysis in the following areas:
-Quantitative Risk Assessment-
Comparative Risk Assessment-
Integrated Human & Ecological Risk Assessment-
Risk Assessment Applications to Human & Ecosystems Health-
Exposure Assessment-
Environmental Fate Assessment-
Multi-Media Assessment-
Hazard Assessment-
Environmental Epidemiology-
Statistical Models and Methods-
Methods Development/Improvement-
Toxicokinetics Modeling-
Animal to Human Extrapolation-
Risk Perception/Communication-
Risk Management-
Regulatory Issues