Comparison of Corcos-Based and Experimentally Derived Coherence Factors for Buffet Forcing Functions

In this paper, high-spatial-resolution unsteady pressure-sensitive paint (UPSP) data are utilized to compare two methods for panel buffet forcing function (BFF) estimation for the Space Launch System (SLS). Such methods are based on discrete pressure measurements within a panel but employ coherence factors to account for partially correlated fluctuating pressures across the whole panel. In one method, coherence factors are derived based on the Corcos model, whereas the second method utilizes experimentally derived coherence factors. To simulate discrete measurements using UPSP data, suitable subsets of the data are extracted. When full UPSP resolution is retained, UPSP data provide a benchmark to assess discrete-measurement-based methods. The analysis focuses on the peak SLS buffet environment located downstream of the forward attachment hardware (FAH) between the core stage and solid rocket boosters. Trends of the Corcos-based and experimentally derived coherence factors are in reasonable agreement with the benchmark. However, at certain frequencies, experimentally derived coherence factors are sensitive to the separation distance between pressure measurements utilized to compute coherence lengths. Such sensitivity originates from deviation of the experimentally based coherence function from an exponential decay assumption. On the other hand, the present implementation of the Corcos model fails to capture certain nonturbulent boundary-layer-related environments, such as a subharmonic of FAH vortex shedding. For all methods presented in this paper, at near-transonic conditions, increased pressure coherence and spatial nonuniformity lead to BFF overestimation and sensitivity to the pressure measurement location within the panel.