宣称普遍的认知权威——关系边界工作和数据科学的学术制度化

Q3 Social Sciences

Swiss Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.2478/sjs-2023-0024

Bianca Prietl, Stefanie Raible

{"title":"宣称普遍的认知权威——关系边界工作和数据科学的学术制度化","authors":"Bianca Prietl, Stefanie Raible","doi":"10.2478/sjs-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article studies the rise of academic data science in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. By focusing on the boundary work that accompanies this development, we try to understand current transformations in knowledge production within digital academia and beyond. Drawing on qualitative interviews with data science scholars, we identify five lines of demarcation in claiming universal epistemic authority. This boundary work is characterized by multiple tensions and varies depending upon context and counterpart, making it inherently relational.","PeriodicalId":39497,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Sociology","volume":"2007 33","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Claiming Universal Epistemic Authority – Relational Boundary Work and the Academic Institutionalization of Data Science\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Prietl, Stefanie Raible\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sjs-2023-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article studies the rise of academic data science in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. By focusing on the boundary work that accompanies this development, we try to understand current transformations in knowledge production within digital academia and beyond. Drawing on qualitative interviews with data science scholars, we identify five lines of demarcation in claiming universal epistemic authority. This boundary work is characterized by multiple tensions and varies depending upon context and counterpart, making it inherently relational.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"2007 33\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2023-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjs-2023-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了德国、奥地利和瑞士学术数据科学的兴起。通过关注伴随这一发展的边界工作，我们试图理解数字学术界内外知识生产的当前转变。通过对数据科学学者的定性访谈，我们确定了声称普遍认知权威的五条分界线。这个边界作品的特点是多重张力，并根据上下文和对应物而变化，使其具有内在的关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Claiming Universal Epistemic Authority – Relational Boundary Work and the Academic Institutionalization of Data Science

Abstract This article studies the rise of academic data science in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. By focusing on the boundary work that accompanies this development, we try to understand current transformations in knowledge production within digital academia and beyond. Drawing on qualitative interviews with data science scholars, we identify five lines of demarcation in claiming universal epistemic authority. This boundary work is characterized by multiple tensions and varies depending upon context and counterpart, making it inherently relational.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Swiss Journal of Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

50 weeks

期刊介绍： The Swiss Journal of Sociology was established in 1975 on the initiative of the Swiss Sociological Association. It is published by Seismo and appears three times a year with the support of the Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences. Since 2016, all the articles of the Swiss Journal of Sociology are available as open access documents on De Gruyter Open: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/sjs The journal is a multilingual voice for analysis and research in sociology. It publishes work on the theory, methods, practice, and history of the social sciences in English, French, or German. Although a central aim of the Journal is to reflect the state of the discipline in Switzerland as well as current developments, articles, research notes, debates, and book reviews will be accepted irrespective of the author’s nationality or whether the submitted work focuses on this country. The journal is understood as a representative medium and therefore open to all research areas, to a plurality of schools and methodological approaches. It neither favours nor excludes any research orientation but particularly intends to promote communication between different perspectives. In order to fulfil this aim, all submissions will be refereed anonymously by at least two reviewers.