尼泊尔加德满都正畸患者的下颌缺损和骨骼错颌:一项放射学研究

Sanjay Prasad Gupta, Shristi Rauniyar
{"title":"尼泊尔加德满都正畸患者的下颌缺损和骨骼错颌:一项放射学研究","authors":"Sanjay Prasad Gupta, Shristi Rauniyar","doi":"10.1177/03015742231202599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To assess the association between hypodontia and skeletal malocclusions in orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study comprised of orthodontic records of 40 hypodontic patients (12 males and 28 females) and 120 non hypodontic patients (58 males and 62 females) as control group matched for gender and age with the study sample who came to the orthodontic department for their treatment were selected. Orthopantamograms were evaluated for hypodontia, whereas lateral cephalogram were traced to determine the cephalometric parameters. The association between different classes of skeletal malocclusion and hypodontia was determined using Pearson’s Chi-square test and the cephalometric parameters between patients with hypodontia and without hypodontia (controls) were assessed using Student’s t-test. Result In hypodontic group, 19 (47.5%) patients had skeletal class II, 18 (45%) patients had skeletal class I, and only 3 (7.5%) patients had skeletal class III malocclusions. Whereas in non-hypodontic group (control group), 86 (53.75%) patients had skeletal class II, 63 (39.38%) patients had skeletal class I, and 11 (6.87%) patients had skeletal class III malocclusions. There was no statistical difference between hypodontia and different skeletal classes of malocclusions ( p = .654). Cephalometric parameters between the control group and hypodontic group did not reveal any significant difference ( p > .05). Conclusion This study did not find any association between different classes of skeletal malocclusions and hypodontia. The cephalometric skeletal parameters were not significantly different in hypodontic and control group. It is suggested that the patients having hypodontia will be evaluated on an individual basis for their treatment.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"2019 39-40","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypodontia and Skeletal Malocclusions Among Orthodontic Patients of Kathmandu, Nepal: A Radiographic Study\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay Prasad Gupta, Shristi Rauniyar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03015742231202599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To assess the association between hypodontia and skeletal malocclusions in orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study comprised of orthodontic records of 40 hypodontic patients (12 males and 28 females) and 120 non hypodontic patients (58 males and 62 females) as control group matched for gender and age with the study sample who came to the orthodontic department for their treatment were selected. Orthopantamograms were evaluated for hypodontia, whereas lateral cephalogram were traced to determine the cephalometric parameters. The association between different classes of skeletal malocclusion and hypodontia was determined using Pearson’s Chi-square test and the cephalometric parameters between patients with hypodontia and without hypodontia (controls) were assessed using Student’s t-test. Result In hypodontic group, 19 (47.5%) patients had skeletal class II, 18 (45%) patients had skeletal class I, and only 3 (7.5%) patients had skeletal class III malocclusions. Whereas in non-hypodontic group (control group), 86 (53.75%) patients had skeletal class II, 63 (39.38%) patients had skeletal class I, and 11 (6.87%) patients had skeletal class III malocclusions. There was no statistical difference between hypodontia and different skeletal classes of malocclusions ( p = .654). Cephalometric parameters between the control group and hypodontic group did not reveal any significant difference ( p > .05). Conclusion This study did not find any association between different classes of skeletal malocclusions and hypodontia. The cephalometric skeletal parameters were not significantly different in hypodontic and control group. It is suggested that the patients having hypodontia will be evaluated on an individual basis for their treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"2019 39-40\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231202599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231202599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨正畸患者下颌畸形与骨骼错牙合的关系。材料与方法本横断面研究选取40例下颌畸形患者(男性12例,女性28例)和120例非下颌畸形患者(男性58例,女性62例)作为对照组,与到正畸科就诊的研究样本性别、年龄相匹配。对下颌畸形进行正位造影评估,而对侧位头颅造影进行追踪以确定头颅测量参数。使用Pearson卡方检验确定不同类型的骨骼错颌与下颌畸形之间的关系,使用学生t检验评估有和没有下颌畸形(对照组)患者的头侧测量参数。结果下颌畸形组ⅱ类错误19例(47.5%),ⅰ类错误18例(45%),ⅲ类错误3例(7.5%)。非下颌畸形组(对照组)有骨骼ⅱ类86例(53.75%),骨骼ⅰ类63例(39.38%),骨骼ⅲ类11例(6.87%)。不同骨骼类型的错咬合患者牙下畸形发生率差异无统计学意义(p = .654)。对照组与缺牙组的头颅测量参数差异无统计学意义(p >. 05)。结论本研究未发现不同类型的骨骼错颌与下颌畸形之间存在关联。下颌缺损组与对照组的颅骨测量参数无显著差异。建议对患有下颌畸形的患者进行个体化治疗评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypodontia and Skeletal Malocclusions Among Orthodontic Patients of Kathmandu, Nepal: A Radiographic Study
Objective To assess the association between hypodontia and skeletal malocclusions in orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study comprised of orthodontic records of 40 hypodontic patients (12 males and 28 females) and 120 non hypodontic patients (58 males and 62 females) as control group matched for gender and age with the study sample who came to the orthodontic department for their treatment were selected. Orthopantamograms were evaluated for hypodontia, whereas lateral cephalogram were traced to determine the cephalometric parameters. The association between different classes of skeletal malocclusion and hypodontia was determined using Pearson’s Chi-square test and the cephalometric parameters between patients with hypodontia and without hypodontia (controls) were assessed using Student’s t-test. Result In hypodontic group, 19 (47.5%) patients had skeletal class II, 18 (45%) patients had skeletal class I, and only 3 (7.5%) patients had skeletal class III malocclusions. Whereas in non-hypodontic group (control group), 86 (53.75%) patients had skeletal class II, 63 (39.38%) patients had skeletal class I, and 11 (6.87%) patients had skeletal class III malocclusions. There was no statistical difference between hypodontia and different skeletal classes of malocclusions ( p = .654). Cephalometric parameters between the control group and hypodontic group did not reveal any significant difference ( p > .05). Conclusion This study did not find any association between different classes of skeletal malocclusions and hypodontia. The cephalometric skeletal parameters were not significantly different in hypodontic and control group. It is suggested that the patients having hypodontia will be evaluated on an individual basis for their treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信