危重病人重症监护经历及其相关因素的二次分析研究

Jiyeon Kang, Hyojeong Woo
{"title":"危重病人重症监护经历及其相关因素的二次分析研究","authors":"Jiyeon Kang, Hyojeong Woo","doi":"10.34250/jkccn.2023.16.3.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : This study investigates the experiences of patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and the factors influencing these experiences.Method : We used a cross-sectional survey design to analyze previously collected cohort data from 891 patients who spent over 24 hours in 19 ICUs across four university hospitals in Busan, South Korea between June 2019 and July 2020. Within a week of ICU discharge, participants completed the Korean version of the Intensive Care Experience Questionnaire, covering four areas: “awareness of surroundings,” “frightening experiences,” “satisfaction with care,” and “recall of experiences.” We used multiple linear regression to identify factors associated with the ICU experience.Results : Low income (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .016), unplanned hospitalization (β = -.09, <i>p</i> = .006), sedation (β = -.16, <i>p</i> < .001), and delirium (β = -.15, <i>p</i> < .001) reduce patients’ awareness of their surroundings. Frightening experiences are associated with being female (β = -.07, <i>p</i> = .027), experiencing delirium (β = -.15, <i>p</i> < .001), and longer stays in the ICU (β = -.14, <i>p</i> < .001). Using sedatives decreases satisfaction with care (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .048). Living alone (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .013) and using painkillers (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .020) reduces recall of experiences.Conclusion : Negative ICU experiences are significantly associated with being female, living alone, lower income, unplanned admission, using sedatives and painkillers, delirium, and longer stays in the ICU. Thus, improving ICU experiences requires interventions that address modifiable factors, such as delirium, medication, and length of ICU stays.","PeriodicalId":16247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing","volume":"58 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive Care Experience of Critical Care Patients and Its Related Factors : A Secondary Analysis Study\",\"authors\":\"Jiyeon Kang, Hyojeong Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.34250/jkccn.2023.16.3.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose : This study investigates the experiences of patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and the factors influencing these experiences.Method : We used a cross-sectional survey design to analyze previously collected cohort data from 891 patients who spent over 24 hours in 19 ICUs across four university hospitals in Busan, South Korea between June 2019 and July 2020. Within a week of ICU discharge, participants completed the Korean version of the Intensive Care Experience Questionnaire, covering four areas: “awareness of surroundings,” “frightening experiences,” “satisfaction with care,” and “recall of experiences.” We used multiple linear regression to identify factors associated with the ICU experience.Results : Low income (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .016), unplanned hospitalization (β = -.09, <i>p</i> = .006), sedation (β = -.16, <i>p</i> < .001), and delirium (β = -.15, <i>p</i> < .001) reduce patients’ awareness of their surroundings. Frightening experiences are associated with being female (β = -.07, <i>p</i> = .027), experiencing delirium (β = -.15, <i>p</i> < .001), and longer stays in the ICU (β = -.14, <i>p</i> < .001). Using sedatives decreases satisfaction with care (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .048). Living alone (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .013) and using painkillers (β = -.08, <i>p</i> = .020) reduces recall of experiences.Conclusion : Negative ICU experiences are significantly associated with being female, living alone, lower income, unplanned admission, using sedatives and painkillers, delirium, and longer stays in the ICU. Thus, improving ICU experiences requires interventions that address modifiable factors, such as delirium, medication, and length of ICU stays.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2023.16.3.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2023.16.3.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨重症监护病房(icu)患者的体验及影响这些体验的因素。方法:我们采用横断面调查设计,分析了2019年6月至2020年7月期间在韩国釜山四所大学医院的19个icu中度过24小时以上的891名患者先前收集的队列数据。在出院后的一周内,参与者完成了韩国版的重症监护体验问卷,包括四个方面:“对周围环境的认识”、“可怕的经历”、“护理满意度”和“经历回忆”。我们使用多元线性回归来确定与ICU经验相关的因素。结果:收入低(β = -。08年,& lt; i>术中;/ i>= 0.016),计划外住院(β = -。09年,& lt; i>术中;/ i>= 0.006),镇静(β = - 0.006)。16日& lt; i>术中;/ i>< .001),谵妄(β = -。15日& lt; i>术中;/ i>< .001)降低患者对周围环境的认识。可怕的经历与女性有关。07年,& lt; i>术中;/ i>= 0.027),经历谵妄(β = -。15日& lt; i>术中;/ i>< .001),且ICU住院时间更长(β = -。14日& lt; i>术中;/ i>< .001). 使用镇静剂会降低护理满意度(β = -)。08年,& lt; i>术中;/ i>= .048)。独居(β = -)08年,& lt; i>术中;/ i>= 0.013)和使用止痛药(β = -。08年,& lt; i>术中;/ i>= 0.020)会减少对经历的回忆。结论:ICU负面经历与女性、独居、低收入、意外入院、使用镇静剂和止痛药、精神错乱、ICU住院时间延长等因素显著相关。因此,改善ICU的经验需要干预,解决可修改的因素,如谵妄,药物和ICU的停留时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensive Care Experience of Critical Care Patients and Its Related Factors : A Secondary Analysis Study
Purpose : This study investigates the experiences of patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and the factors influencing these experiences.Method : We used a cross-sectional survey design to analyze previously collected cohort data from 891 patients who spent over 24 hours in 19 ICUs across four university hospitals in Busan, South Korea between June 2019 and July 2020. Within a week of ICU discharge, participants completed the Korean version of the Intensive Care Experience Questionnaire, covering four areas: “awareness of surroundings,” “frightening experiences,” “satisfaction with care,” and “recall of experiences.” We used multiple linear regression to identify factors associated with the ICU experience.Results : Low income (β = -.08, p = .016), unplanned hospitalization (β = -.09, p = .006), sedation (β = -.16, p < .001), and delirium (β = -.15, p < .001) reduce patients’ awareness of their surroundings. Frightening experiences are associated with being female (β = -.07, p = .027), experiencing delirium (β = -.15, p < .001), and longer stays in the ICU (β = -.14, p < .001). Using sedatives decreases satisfaction with care (β = -.08, p = .048). Living alone (β = -.08, p = .013) and using painkillers (β = -.08, p = .020) reduces recall of experiences.Conclusion : Negative ICU experiences are significantly associated with being female, living alone, lower income, unplanned admission, using sedatives and painkillers, delirium, and longer stays in the ICU. Thus, improving ICU experiences requires interventions that address modifiable factors, such as delirium, medication, and length of ICU stays.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信