各种冒险运动中运动焦虑的比较分析

Anurag Raghubanshi, Dr. CP Singh Bhati
{"title":"各种冒险运动中运动焦虑的比较分析","authors":"Anurag Raghubanshi, Dr. CP Singh Bhati","doi":"10.33545/27077012.2023.v4.i2b.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted to investigate about the anxiety level between two adventure water sports. And also compare the anxiety levels among participants these water-based sports, kayaking and canoeing. To fulfil the objectives of the study total 20 participants were recruited, 10 from each sport. The mean anxiety scores were found to be 21.53 ± 3.14 for kayaking and 21.73 ± 3.15 for canoeing, with a p-value exceeding 0.05, indicating no statistically significant difference in anxiety levels between the two groups. These results suggest that the choice between kayaking and canoeing does not appear to significantly influence anxiety experiences in sports. This finding aligns with the idea that psychological factors, individual differences, and competition stressors may exert more significant influence on anxiety than the specific watercraft discipline. However, further research with larger and more diverse samples is warranted to confirm these findings and explore additional factors that may contribute to anxiety in water-based sports. Understanding anxiety in these contexts is essential for optimizing athlete performance and well-being.","PeriodicalId":489118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sports science and nutrition","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of sports anxiety across various adventure sports\",\"authors\":\"Anurag Raghubanshi, Dr. CP Singh Bhati\",\"doi\":\"10.33545/27077012.2023.v4.i2b.198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study was conducted to investigate about the anxiety level between two adventure water sports. And also compare the anxiety levels among participants these water-based sports, kayaking and canoeing. To fulfil the objectives of the study total 20 participants were recruited, 10 from each sport. The mean anxiety scores were found to be 21.53 ± 3.14 for kayaking and 21.73 ± 3.15 for canoeing, with a p-value exceeding 0.05, indicating no statistically significant difference in anxiety levels between the two groups. These results suggest that the choice between kayaking and canoeing does not appear to significantly influence anxiety experiences in sports. This finding aligns with the idea that psychological factors, individual differences, and competition stressors may exert more significant influence on anxiety than the specific watercraft discipline. However, further research with larger and more diverse samples is warranted to confirm these findings and explore additional factors that may contribute to anxiety in water-based sports. Understanding anxiety in these contexts is essential for optimizing athlete performance and well-being.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of sports science and nutrition\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of sports science and nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33545/27077012.2023.v4.i2b.198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sports science and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/27077012.2023.v4.i2b.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨两次冒险水上运动之间的焦虑水平。还比较了参与者的焦虑水平这些水上运动,皮划艇和独木舟。为了完成研究的目标,总共招募了20名参与者,每个项目10名。皮划艇组和皮划艇组的平均焦虑得分分别为21.53±3.14分和21.73±3.15分,p值均超过0.05,两组焦虑水平差异无统计学意义。这些结果表明,皮划艇和独木舟之间的选择似乎不会显著影响运动中的焦虑体验。这一发现与心理因素、个体差异和竞争压力源对焦虑的影响可能比特定的水上运动学科更显著的观点相一致。然而,进一步的研究需要更大、更多样化的样本来证实这些发现,并探索可能导致水上运动焦虑的其他因素。了解这些情况下的焦虑对于优化运动员的表现和健康至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of sports anxiety across various adventure sports
The study was conducted to investigate about the anxiety level between two adventure water sports. And also compare the anxiety levels among participants these water-based sports, kayaking and canoeing. To fulfil the objectives of the study total 20 participants were recruited, 10 from each sport. The mean anxiety scores were found to be 21.53 ± 3.14 for kayaking and 21.73 ± 3.15 for canoeing, with a p-value exceeding 0.05, indicating no statistically significant difference in anxiety levels between the two groups. These results suggest that the choice between kayaking and canoeing does not appear to significantly influence anxiety experiences in sports. This finding aligns with the idea that psychological factors, individual differences, and competition stressors may exert more significant influence on anxiety than the specific watercraft discipline. However, further research with larger and more diverse samples is warranted to confirm these findings and explore additional factors that may contribute to anxiety in water-based sports. Understanding anxiety in these contexts is essential for optimizing athlete performance and well-being.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信