非正式护理评估中支付意愿和接受意愿的决定因素。cuidass研究

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Juan Oliva, Luz María Peña Longobardo, Leticia García-Mochón, José María Abellán-Perpìñan, María del Mar García-Calvente
{"title":"非正式护理评估中支付意愿和接受意愿的决定因素。cuidass研究","authors":"Juan Oliva, Luz María Peña Longobardo, Leticia García-Mochón, José María Abellán-Perpìñan, María del Mar García-Calvente","doi":"10.1108/aea-02-2023-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to study the value of informal care (IC) time from the perspective of caregivers using two alternative contingent valuation tools – willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) – and to identify the variables that affect the stated values. Design/methodology/approach The authors used data from a multi-centre study of 610 adult caregivers conducted in two Spanish regions in 2013. The existence of “protest zeros” and “economic zeros” because of the severe budgetary constraints of the households was also considered. Two-part multivariate models were used to analyse the main factors that explained the declared values of WTA and WTP. Findings The average WTP and WTA were €3.12 and €5.98 per hour of care, respectively (€3.2 and €6.3 when estimated values for “protest zeros” and “economic zeros” were considered). Some explanatory variables of WTA and WTP are coincident (place of residence and intensity of care time), whereas other variables only help to explain WTP values (household and negative coping with caregiving) or WTA values (age and burden of care). Some nuances are also identified when comparing the results obtained without protest and economic zeros with the estimated values of these special zeros. Originality/value Studies analysing the determinants of WTP and WTA in IC settings are very scarce. This paper seeks to provide information to fill this gap. The results indicate that the variables that explain the value of IC from one perspective may differ from the variables that explain it from an alternative perspective. Given the relevance of contextual factors, studies on the topic should be expanded, and care should be taken with the extrapolation of results across countries and settings.","PeriodicalId":36191,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Analysis","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of the willingness to pay and willingness to accept in the valuation of informal care. The CUIDARSE study\",\"authors\":\"Juan Oliva, Luz María Peña Longobardo, Leticia García-Mochón, José María Abellán-Perpìñan, María del Mar García-Calvente\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/aea-02-2023-0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This paper aims to study the value of informal care (IC) time from the perspective of caregivers using two alternative contingent valuation tools – willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) – and to identify the variables that affect the stated values. Design/methodology/approach The authors used data from a multi-centre study of 610 adult caregivers conducted in two Spanish regions in 2013. The existence of “protest zeros” and “economic zeros” because of the severe budgetary constraints of the households was also considered. Two-part multivariate models were used to analyse the main factors that explained the declared values of WTA and WTP. Findings The average WTP and WTA were €3.12 and €5.98 per hour of care, respectively (€3.2 and €6.3 when estimated values for “protest zeros” and “economic zeros” were considered). Some explanatory variables of WTA and WTP are coincident (place of residence and intensity of care time), whereas other variables only help to explain WTP values (household and negative coping with caregiving) or WTA values (age and burden of care). Some nuances are also identified when comparing the results obtained without protest and economic zeros with the estimated values of these special zeros. Originality/value Studies analysing the determinants of WTP and WTA in IC settings are very scarce. This paper seeks to provide information to fill this gap. The results indicate that the variables that explain the value of IC from one perspective may differ from the variables that explain it from an alternative perspective. Given the relevance of contextual factors, studies on the topic should be expanded, and care should be taken with the extrapolation of results across countries and settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economic Analysis\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economic Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-02-2023-0044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-02-2023-0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在从照顾者的角度,利用两种可选的条件评估工具——支付意愿(WTP)和接受意愿(WTA)——研究非正式照顾时间的价值,并确定影响所述价值的变量。设计/方法/方法作者使用了2013年在西班牙两个地区对610名成人护理人员进行的多中心研究的数据。还审议了由于家庭预算严重紧张而存在的“抗议零”和“经济零”。采用两部分多元模型分析了解释WTA和WTP申报值的主要因素。平均WTP和WTA分别为每小时3.12欧元和5.98欧元(考虑到“抗议零”和“经济零”的估计值,分别为3.2欧元和6.3欧元)。WTA和WTP的一些解释变量(居住地和照顾时间强度)是重合的,而其他变量仅有助于解释WTP值(家庭和消极应对照顾)或WTA值(年龄和照顾负担)。在比较没有抗议和经济零的结果与这些特殊零的估计值时,还发现了一些细微差别。独创性/价值研究分析了IC环境中WTP和WTA的决定因素非常少。本文试图提供信息来填补这一空白。结果表明,从一个角度解释IC价值的变量可能与从另一个角度解释IC价值的变量不同。鉴于背景因素的相关性,应扩大对这一专题的研究,并应注意将结果外推到不同的国家和环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determinants of the willingness to pay and willingness to accept in the valuation of informal care. The CUIDARSE study
Purpose This paper aims to study the value of informal care (IC) time from the perspective of caregivers using two alternative contingent valuation tools – willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) – and to identify the variables that affect the stated values. Design/methodology/approach The authors used data from a multi-centre study of 610 adult caregivers conducted in two Spanish regions in 2013. The existence of “protest zeros” and “economic zeros” because of the severe budgetary constraints of the households was also considered. Two-part multivariate models were used to analyse the main factors that explained the declared values of WTA and WTP. Findings The average WTP and WTA were €3.12 and €5.98 per hour of care, respectively (€3.2 and €6.3 when estimated values for “protest zeros” and “economic zeros” were considered). Some explanatory variables of WTA and WTP are coincident (place of residence and intensity of care time), whereas other variables only help to explain WTP values (household and negative coping with caregiving) or WTA values (age and burden of care). Some nuances are also identified when comparing the results obtained without protest and economic zeros with the estimated values of these special zeros. Originality/value Studies analysing the determinants of WTP and WTA in IC settings are very scarce. This paper seeks to provide information to fill this gap. The results indicate that the variables that explain the value of IC from one perspective may differ from the variables that explain it from an alternative perspective. Given the relevance of contextual factors, studies on the topic should be expanded, and care should be taken with the extrapolation of results across countries and settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economic Analysis
Applied Economic Analysis Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信