{"title":"肉桂素治疗急性及加重慢性鼻窦炎","authors":"Rumen Benchev, Dilyana Vicheva","doi":"10.2478/rjr-2023-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract BACKGROUND. Patients with rhinosinusitis account for about 30% of the total amount of otolaryngologic patients and their number is constantly growing. Currently, there is no ideal treatment for acute and especially chronic rhinosinusitis and various therapeutic approaches are still under debate. OBJECTIVES. To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of Cinnabsin® in acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS. We included in our non-interventional, multicenter, prospective study 200 patients with acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis in order to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of treatment with Cinnabsin® (while 20 out of 200 patients received additional therapy, only patients who did not receive additional therapy were taken into account in the statistical analysis; 180 patients have been treated with Cinnabsin® only and this is the basis of the statistical assessments performed). Changes in the total score of the typical symptoms of rhinosinusitis were assessed, and changes in edema, hyperemia and secretion were assessed by rhinoscopy. RESULTS. The total score of the typical symptoms of rhinosinusitis showed a statistically significant difference between the first and final visits – v4 vs. v1 according to Pearson Chi-square (p = 0.0000) as well as in accordance with Risk Difference (RD), Relative Risk (RR), Odds Ratio (OR) ratios at the beginning and end of the treatment. The healthy status of the patients (major improvement, improvement, no complaints) was rated as 93.9% at the final visit. The efficacy of treatment (major improvement, improvement, no complaints) was rated as 93.9% at the final visit. Treatment tolerance was rated as very good in almost all patients (99.4%). CONCLUSION. Cinnabsin® could be considered efficient in reducing the symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis, shows a very good safety profile, and could be recommended for outpatient treatment of patients with acute or exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis, no matter the additional therapy.","PeriodicalId":498190,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Rhinology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment with Cinnabsin in patients with acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis\",\"authors\":\"Rumen Benchev, Dilyana Vicheva\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rjr-2023-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract BACKGROUND. Patients with rhinosinusitis account for about 30% of the total amount of otolaryngologic patients and their number is constantly growing. Currently, there is no ideal treatment for acute and especially chronic rhinosinusitis and various therapeutic approaches are still under debate. OBJECTIVES. To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of Cinnabsin® in acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS. We included in our non-interventional, multicenter, prospective study 200 patients with acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis in order to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of treatment with Cinnabsin® (while 20 out of 200 patients received additional therapy, only patients who did not receive additional therapy were taken into account in the statistical analysis; 180 patients have been treated with Cinnabsin® only and this is the basis of the statistical assessments performed). Changes in the total score of the typical symptoms of rhinosinusitis were assessed, and changes in edema, hyperemia and secretion were assessed by rhinoscopy. RESULTS. The total score of the typical symptoms of rhinosinusitis showed a statistically significant difference between the first and final visits – v4 vs. v1 according to Pearson Chi-square (p = 0.0000) as well as in accordance with Risk Difference (RD), Relative Risk (RR), Odds Ratio (OR) ratios at the beginning and end of the treatment. The healthy status of the patients (major improvement, improvement, no complaints) was rated as 93.9% at the final visit. The efficacy of treatment (major improvement, improvement, no complaints) was rated as 93.9% at the final visit. Treatment tolerance was rated as very good in almost all patients (99.4%). CONCLUSION. Cinnabsin® could be considered efficient in reducing the symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis, shows a very good safety profile, and could be recommended for outpatient treatment of patients with acute or exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis, no matter the additional therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":498190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian Journal of Rhinology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian Journal of Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjr-2023-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjr-2023-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
抽象的背景。鼻鼻窦炎患者约占耳鼻喉科患者总数的30%,且数量在不断增长。目前,急性鼻窦炎特别是慢性鼻窦炎没有理想的治疗方法,各种治疗方法仍在争论中。目标。评价肉桂素®治疗急性和加重慢性鼻窦炎的有效性和安全性。材料和方法。我们在非介入性、多中心、前瞻性研究中纳入了200例急性和加重慢性鼻窦炎患者,以评估Cinnabsin®治疗的有效性和安全性(200例患者中有20例接受了额外治疗,只有未接受额外治疗的患者被纳入统计分析;180例患者仅接受了Cinnabsin®治疗(这是进行统计评估的基础)。评估鼻窦炎典型症状总分的变化,并通过鼻镜评估水肿、充血和分泌物的变化。结果。根据Pearson卡方(p = 0.0000),以及根据治疗开始和结束时的风险差异(RD)、相对风险(RR)、优势比(OR),鼻窦炎典型症状的总分在首次和最后一次就诊之间有统计学意义- v4 vs. v1。终末访视时患者健康状况(好转、好转、无主诉)为93.9%。治疗有效率(主要改善、改善、无投诉)为93.9%。几乎所有患者(99.4%)的治疗耐受性都被评为非常好。结论。Cinnabsin®可以被认为有效地减轻急性鼻窦炎的症状,显示出非常好的安全性,并且可以推荐用于急性或加重的慢性鼻窦炎患者的门诊治疗,无论额外的治疗。
Treatment with Cinnabsin in patients with acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis
Abstract BACKGROUND. Patients with rhinosinusitis account for about 30% of the total amount of otolaryngologic patients and their number is constantly growing. Currently, there is no ideal treatment for acute and especially chronic rhinosinusitis and various therapeutic approaches are still under debate. OBJECTIVES. To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of Cinnabsin® in acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS. We included in our non-interventional, multicenter, prospective study 200 patients with acute and exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis in order to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of treatment with Cinnabsin® (while 20 out of 200 patients received additional therapy, only patients who did not receive additional therapy were taken into account in the statistical analysis; 180 patients have been treated with Cinnabsin® only and this is the basis of the statistical assessments performed). Changes in the total score of the typical symptoms of rhinosinusitis were assessed, and changes in edema, hyperemia and secretion were assessed by rhinoscopy. RESULTS. The total score of the typical symptoms of rhinosinusitis showed a statistically significant difference between the first and final visits – v4 vs. v1 according to Pearson Chi-square (p = 0.0000) as well as in accordance with Risk Difference (RD), Relative Risk (RR), Odds Ratio (OR) ratios at the beginning and end of the treatment. The healthy status of the patients (major improvement, improvement, no complaints) was rated as 93.9% at the final visit. The efficacy of treatment (major improvement, improvement, no complaints) was rated as 93.9% at the final visit. Treatment tolerance was rated as very good in almost all patients (99.4%). CONCLUSION. Cinnabsin® could be considered efficient in reducing the symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis, shows a very good safety profile, and could be recommended for outpatient treatment of patients with acute or exacerbated chronic rhinosinusitis, no matter the additional therapy.