父母报告的脑瘫儿童PEDI-CAT活动能力和大运动功能测量的预测有效性

Q3 Medicine
Nashwah Khadeeja, Amitesh Narayan, Shreekanth D Karnad, Vijaya Kumar K
{"title":"父母报告的脑瘫儿童PEDI-CAT活动能力和大运动功能测量的预测有效性","authors":"Nashwah Khadeeja, Amitesh Narayan, Shreekanth D Karnad, Vijaya Kumar K","doi":"10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent contemporary studies demonstrated strong correlation between Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) and parent-reported Mobility domain of Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT Mobility) in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). Hence, a need arose to investigate the prospect of predicting GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores to estimate a child’s gross motor function score. Objectives: To examine the predictability of GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility scores in children with CP at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II and III. Methods: GMFM-66 and PEDI-CAT Mobility scales were administered to 24 children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated and an association between the two scores was obtained. Regression analysis was done to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Results: GMFM-66 scores and the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores showed strong positive correlation in children with CP [GMFCS level II (r = 0.876, p= 0.006); and GMFCS level III (r= 0.709, p<0.002)]. Regression analysis generated two equations for each level which were used to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Conclusion: The association is strong between the two scores (GMFM-66 scores and PEDI-CAT Mobility scores). Hence, PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores can be used to predict the corresponding GMFM-66 scores in children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III with moderate to high accuracy. Keywords: GMFM-66, PEDI-CAT Mobility, Cerebral Palsy, GMFCS","PeriodicalId":55870,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Validity of Parent-Reported PEDI-CAT Mobility and Gross Motor Function Measure in Children with Cerebral Palsy\",\"authors\":\"Nashwah Khadeeja, Amitesh Narayan, Shreekanth D Karnad, Vijaya Kumar K\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Recent contemporary studies demonstrated strong correlation between Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) and parent-reported Mobility domain of Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT Mobility) in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). Hence, a need arose to investigate the prospect of predicting GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores to estimate a child’s gross motor function score. Objectives: To examine the predictability of GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility scores in children with CP at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II and III. Methods: GMFM-66 and PEDI-CAT Mobility scales were administered to 24 children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated and an association between the two scores was obtained. Regression analysis was done to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Results: GMFM-66 scores and the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores showed strong positive correlation in children with CP [GMFCS level II (r = 0.876, p= 0.006); and GMFCS level III (r= 0.709, p<0.002)]. Regression analysis generated two equations for each level which were used to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Conclusion: The association is strong between the two scores (GMFM-66 scores and PEDI-CAT Mobility scores). Hence, PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores can be used to predict the corresponding GMFM-66 scores in children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III with moderate to high accuracy. Keywords: GMFM-66, PEDI-CAT Mobility, Cerebral Palsy, GMFCS\",\"PeriodicalId\":55870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevphysrehabilmed.2023049196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的当代研究表明,大运动功能测量(GMFM-66)与家长报告的脑瘫(CP)儿童残疾评估-计算机适应测试(PEDI-CAT Mobility)的活动域有很强的相关性。因此,有必要研究使用PEDI-CAT活动域评分来预测儿童大运动功能评分的GMFM-66评分的前景。目的:研究使用PEDI-CAT活动能力评分对CP患儿大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS) II级和III级GMFM-66评分的可预测性。方法:采用GMFM-66和PEDI-CAT活动能力量表对24例GMFCS二级和三级CP患儿进行评分。计算Pearson相关系数,得出两个分数之间的相关性。通过回归分析预测GMFM-66评分和PEDI-CAT移动性评分。结果:CP患儿GMFM-66评分与PEDI-CAT活动能力评分呈强正相关(r = 0.876, p= 0.006);GMFCS III级(r= 0.709, p<0.002)]。回归分析为每个水平生成两个方程,用于从PEDI-CAT流动性评分预测GMFM-66评分。结论:两项评分(GMFM-66评分和PEDI-CAT活动能力评分)之间存在较强的相关性。因此,PEDI-CAT活动域评分可用于预测CP患儿GMFCS II级和III级相应的GMFM-66评分,准确度中至高。关键词:GMFM-66, PEDI-CAT活动能力,脑瘫,GMFCS
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Validity of Parent-Reported PEDI-CAT Mobility and Gross Motor Function Measure in Children with Cerebral Palsy
Background: Recent contemporary studies demonstrated strong correlation between Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) and parent-reported Mobility domain of Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT Mobility) in children with Cerebral Palsy (CP). Hence, a need arose to investigate the prospect of predicting GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores to estimate a child’s gross motor function score. Objectives: To examine the predictability of GMFM-66 scores using PEDI-CAT Mobility scores in children with CP at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II and III. Methods: GMFM-66 and PEDI-CAT Mobility scales were administered to 24 children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated and an association between the two scores was obtained. Regression analysis was done to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Results: GMFM-66 scores and the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores showed strong positive correlation in children with CP [GMFCS level II (r = 0.876, p= 0.006); and GMFCS level III (r= 0.709, p<0.002)]. Regression analysis generated two equations for each level which were used to predict GMFM-66 scores from the PEDI-CAT Mobility scores. Conclusion: The association is strong between the two scores (GMFM-66 scores and PEDI-CAT Mobility scores). Hence, PEDI-CAT Mobility domain scores can be used to predict the corresponding GMFM-66 scores in children with CP at GMFCS levels II and III with moderate to high accuracy. Keywords: GMFM-66, PEDI-CAT Mobility, Cerebral Palsy, GMFCS
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine encompasses all healing technologies other than those based on altering body chemistry (drugs) or integrity (surgery). The journal provides reviews of well-established diagnostic methods, clinical modalities and techniques and physical and rehabilitation medicine. The journal appears quarterly and includes from one to four articles that summarize and evaluate the current status of an important topic in the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine. Topics and authors are chosen by members of our distinguished Editorial Board, all of whom are leading practitioners, researchers, and active contributors to the literature in their area of expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信