{"title":"不惩罚克隆人","authors":"R. L. Kochnev","doi":"10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-95-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a commentary and supplementary study to the Russian translation of Mark Walker’s article «Branching Is Not a Bug; It’s a Feature: Personal Identity and Legal (and Moral) Responsibility» published in this journal. The article discusses the difficulties that type/token theory encounters when analyzing cases of the existence of art objects and persons over time. An alternative solution, based on the ideas of Derek Parfit, is proposed.","PeriodicalId":499874,"journal":{"name":"Omskij naučnyj vestnik","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Punish no clone\",\"authors\":\"R. L. Kochnev\",\"doi\":\"10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-95-101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a commentary and supplementary study to the Russian translation of Mark Walker’s article «Branching Is Not a Bug; It’s a Feature: Personal Identity and Legal (and Moral) Responsibility» published in this journal. The article discusses the difficulties that type/token theory encounters when analyzing cases of the existence of art objects and persons over time. An alternative solution, based on the ideas of Derek Parfit, is proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omskij naučnyj vestnik\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omskij naučnyj vestnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-95-101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omskij naučnyj vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2023-8-3-95-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article is a commentary and supplementary study to the Russian translation of Mark Walker’s article «Branching Is Not a Bug; It’s a Feature: Personal Identity and Legal (and Moral) Responsibility» published in this journal. The article discusses the difficulties that type/token theory encounters when analyzing cases of the existence of art objects and persons over time. An alternative solution, based on the ideas of Derek Parfit, is proposed.