有意和无意的城市森林

IF 0.4 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Jorg Sieweke
{"title":"有意和无意的城市森林","authors":"Jorg Sieweke","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe term ‘urban forest’ is an oxymoron and continues to provoke a staggering set of questions. The default practice of transplanting cloned saplings from nurseries into the city holds little promise of adding up to more than the sum of its destressed trees. In contrast, there is growing recognition of the unsanctioned emergent forest vegetation of urban fallows. While the fields of cultural geography and urban ecology recognize such unintentional urban forests for their layered sociocultural, ecological and health benefits, city administrators, the general public and even landscape architects have been slower to embrace them. However, consequences of global warming and the subsequent rise of urban ecology mandates an update regarding current challenges and potentials in managing urban forests. Park projects can expand the normative canon by embracing recent urban ecology concepts concerning spontaneous vegetation on fallow urban land, such as ‘ruderal’ and ‘fourth nature’. This paper critically reviews traditional notions of urban forestry and refutes the single tree planting approach. It questions standardized connotations and nativist biases towards invasive species and argues that spontaneous vegetation is well equipped to provide and expand critical networks to more resilient and enduring urban forest patches. It explores cases in Germany, in general, and Berlin, in particular, to ground the relevance for emergent vegetation. It considers the acknowledgment and utilization of recent developments in forestry science regarding microbial ecology, including the mycorrhizal and symbiotic macro/micro networks, important for landscape architecture and necessary to propose more resilient and healthy forested urban environments.Keywords: urban ecologymyceliumwood-wide-webmicrobiomeholobiont AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank professor Kelly Shannon for her invaluable contribution in the editing process. My special thanks go to Dr Jake M. Robinson, microbial ecologist, for his work as consultant and studio co-advisor, and my research assistants Flora Kießling and Florian Opitz at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. The work was funded through the Norwegian Research Council, project “spaces for resilience”.Notes1 Sonja Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New York City and Berlin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 21–42.2 Berlin’s rapid increase in housing along with the growth of industrialization was structured by British engineer James Hobrecht, who introduced the layout of the sewer network as the armature for urban form.3 Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1), 2.4 Joanna Dean, ‘Seeing Trees, Thinking Forests: Urban Forestry at the University of Toronto in the 1960s’, in: Alan Mac-Eachern and William J. Turkel (eds.), Method and Meaning in Canadian Environmental History (Toronto: Nelson, 2009).5 Dieter Hennebo, Garden and landscape historian, 1970, in: Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1).6 Lara A. Roman and Frederick N. Scatena, ‘Street Tree Survival Rates: Meta-analysis of Previous Studies and Application to a Field Survey in Philadelphia, PA, USA’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10 (2011), 269–274.7 Samuli Helama et al. ‘Mortality of Urban Pines in Helsinki Explored Using Tree Rings and Climate Records’, Trees 26 (2012), 353–362; Ian A. Smith, Victoria K. Dearborn and Lucy R. Hutyra. ‘Live Fast, Die Young: Accelerated Growth, Mortality, and Turnover in Street Trees’, PLoS ONE 14 (2019).8 Ingo Kowarik, ‘Cities and Wilderness: A New Perspective’, International Journal of Wilderness 19/3 (2013), 32–36.9 Peter Latz, Rust Red: The Landscape Park Duisburg-Nord (Munich: Hirmer, 2017).10 Matthew Gandy, ‘Unintentional Landscapes’, Landscape Research 41/4 (2016), 433–440.11 Peter Del Tredici, ‘Spontaneous Urban Vegetation: Reflections of Change in a Globalized World’, Nature and Culture 10 (2010).12 Film directed by Matthew Gandy (UK and Germany, 2017), 72 min., colour; Matthew Gandy (ed.), Natura Urbana: The Brachen of Berlin, collection of essays to accompany the DVD publication, with contributions by Susanne Hauser et al. (2019), naturaurbana.org.13 Gavid Gissen, Subnature: Architecture’s Other Environments (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2009).14 Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (New York: ARK Edition, 1966).15 Gandy, ‘Unintentional Landscapes’, op. cit. (note 10).16 Gilles Clément, ‘Third Landscape’, TEH Series on New Imaginaries #3, Trans Europe Halles (2003).17 Anita Bakshi and Frank Gallagher, ‘Design with Fourth Nature’, Journal of Landscape Architecture 15/2 (2020), 24–35.18 Kevin J. Beiler, Susan W. Simard and Daniel M. Durall, ‘Topology of Tree–mycorrhizal Fungus Interaction Networks in Weric and Mesic Douglas-fir Forests’, Journal of Ecology 103/3 (2015), 616–628.19 David H. McNear Jr, ‘The Rhizosphere: Roots, Soil and Everything In Between’, Nature Education Knowledge 4/3 (2013), 1.20 Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).21 Scott Gilbert, Jan Sapp and Alfred Tauber, ‘A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals’, The Quarterly Review of Biology 87/4 (2012), 325–341.22 Alfred I. Tauber, ‘The Immune System and Its Ecology’, Philosophy of Science 75/2 (2008), 224–245.23 Witoon Purahong et al., ‘City Life of Mycorrhizal and Wood-inhabiting Macrofungi: Importance of Urban Areas for Maintaining Fungal Biodiversity’, Landscape and Urban Planning 221 (2022).24 Michael Bonkowski, Cecile Villenave and Bryan Griffiths, ‘Rhizosphere Fauna: The Functional and Structural Diversity of Intimate Interactions of Soil Fauna with Plant Roots’, Plant Soil 321 (2009), 213–233.25 Kevin Beiler et al., ‘Architecture of the Wood-Wide Web: Rhizopogon spp. Genets Link Multiple Douglas-fir Cohorts’, New Phytologist 185 (2010), 543–553.26 Ferris Jabr, ‘The Social Life of Forests’, The New York Times, 3 December 2020.27 ‘“Finding the Mother Tree”: An Interview with Suzanne Simard’, Emergence Magazine, 26 October 2022, emergencemagazine.org/podcast/, 65 min.28 Lynn Margulis, Early Life (Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1982).29 Merlin Sheldrake, Entangled Life (New York: Random House, 2020).30 GEFA product description, gefafabritz.com/products/private-garden/endo-mycorrhiza-foliage-tree.html.31 Mark Nieuwenhuijsen et al. ‘Fifty Shades of Green: Pathway to Healthy Urban Living’, Epidemiology 28/1 (2017), 63–71.32 Takeshi Ichinohe, Iris K. Pang and Yosuke Kumamoto, ‘Microbiota Regulates Immune Defence Against Respiratory Tract Influenza A Virus Infection’, PNAS 108/13 (2011), 5354–5359.33 Jessica Stanhope, Martin F. Breed and Philip Weinstein, ‘Exposure to Greenspaces Could Reduce the High Global Burden of Pain’, Environmental Research 187 (2020).34 Jake M. Robinson and Anna Jorgensen, ‘Rekindling Old Friendships in New Landscapes: The Environment–Microbiome–Health Axis in the Realms of Landscape Research’, People and Nature 2/2 (2020), 339–349.35 Jack Gilbert and Josh Neufeld, ‘Life in a World without Microbes’, PLoS Biology 12 (2014).36 McNear ‘The Rhizosphere’, op. cit. (note 19).37 Jacob G. Mills et al., ‘Urban Habitat Restoration Provides a Human Health Benefit through Microbiome Rewilding: The Microbiome Rewilding Hypothesis’, Restoration Ecology 25 (2017), 866–872.38 Nicholas J. C. Gellie et al., ‘Revegetation Rewilds the Soil Bacterial Microbiome of an Old Field’, Molecular Ecology 26/11 (2017), 2895–2904.39 Zdravko Baruch, et al., ‘Increased Plant Species Richness Associates with Greater Soil Bacterial Diversity in Urban Green Spaces’, Environmental Research 196 (2021).40 Ehrenfried Pfeifer (1899–1961), German scientist, soil scientist, leading advocate of biodynamic agriculture, anthroposophist and student of Rudolf Steiner.41 Benjamin M. Ford et al., Paper Chromatography: An Inconsistent Tool for Assessing Soil Health’, Geoderma 383 (2021).42 Maria Olga Kokornaczyk et al., ‘Analysis of Soils by Means of Pfeiffer’s Circular Chromatography Test and Comparison to Chemical Analysis Results’, Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 33/3 (2017), 143–157.43 Graham Huggan, Colonialism, Culture, Whale: The Cetacean Quartet (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJorg SiewekeJorg Sieweke, licensed landscape architect and urban designer, directs his practice ParadoXcity in Berlin. He is an associate professor at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. He obtained his PhD from the TU Berlin in 2015; fellowships in Hamburg (DAAD, 2014) and Rome (Villa Massimo, 2015). He held academic appointments at the University of Virginia, the RWTH Aachen, the HCU Hamburg, the TU Berlin and the TU Dresden as well as at various Art Academies (ABK Stuttgart, UDK Berlin and Berlin-Weissensee).","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"273 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deliberate and less intentional urban forests\",\"authors\":\"Jorg Sieweke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe term ‘urban forest’ is an oxymoron and continues to provoke a staggering set of questions. The default practice of transplanting cloned saplings from nurseries into the city holds little promise of adding up to more than the sum of its destressed trees. In contrast, there is growing recognition of the unsanctioned emergent forest vegetation of urban fallows. While the fields of cultural geography and urban ecology recognize such unintentional urban forests for their layered sociocultural, ecological and health benefits, city administrators, the general public and even landscape architects have been slower to embrace them. However, consequences of global warming and the subsequent rise of urban ecology mandates an update regarding current challenges and potentials in managing urban forests. Park projects can expand the normative canon by embracing recent urban ecology concepts concerning spontaneous vegetation on fallow urban land, such as ‘ruderal’ and ‘fourth nature’. This paper critically reviews traditional notions of urban forestry and refutes the single tree planting approach. It questions standardized connotations and nativist biases towards invasive species and argues that spontaneous vegetation is well equipped to provide and expand critical networks to more resilient and enduring urban forest patches. It explores cases in Germany, in general, and Berlin, in particular, to ground the relevance for emergent vegetation. It considers the acknowledgment and utilization of recent developments in forestry science regarding microbial ecology, including the mycorrhizal and symbiotic macro/micro networks, important for landscape architecture and necessary to propose more resilient and healthy forested urban environments.Keywords: urban ecologymyceliumwood-wide-webmicrobiomeholobiont AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank professor Kelly Shannon for her invaluable contribution in the editing process. My special thanks go to Dr Jake M. Robinson, microbial ecologist, for his work as consultant and studio co-advisor, and my research assistants Flora Kießling and Florian Opitz at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. The work was funded through the Norwegian Research Council, project “spaces for resilience”.Notes1 Sonja Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New York City and Berlin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 21–42.2 Berlin’s rapid increase in housing along with the growth of industrialization was structured by British engineer James Hobrecht, who introduced the layout of the sewer network as the armature for urban form.3 Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1), 2.4 Joanna Dean, ‘Seeing Trees, Thinking Forests: Urban Forestry at the University of Toronto in the 1960s’, in: Alan Mac-Eachern and William J. Turkel (eds.), Method and Meaning in Canadian Environmental History (Toronto: Nelson, 2009).5 Dieter Hennebo, Garden and landscape historian, 1970, in: Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1).6 Lara A. Roman and Frederick N. Scatena, ‘Street Tree Survival Rates: Meta-analysis of Previous Studies and Application to a Field Survey in Philadelphia, PA, USA’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10 (2011), 269–274.7 Samuli Helama et al. ‘Mortality of Urban Pines in Helsinki Explored Using Tree Rings and Climate Records’, Trees 26 (2012), 353–362; Ian A. Smith, Victoria K. Dearborn and Lucy R. Hutyra. ‘Live Fast, Die Young: Accelerated Growth, Mortality, and Turnover in Street Trees’, PLoS ONE 14 (2019).8 Ingo Kowarik, ‘Cities and Wilderness: A New Perspective’, International Journal of Wilderness 19/3 (2013), 32–36.9 Peter Latz, Rust Red: The Landscape Park Duisburg-Nord (Munich: Hirmer, 2017).10 Matthew Gandy, ‘Unintentional Landscapes’, Landscape Research 41/4 (2016), 433–440.11 Peter Del Tredici, ‘Spontaneous Urban Vegetation: Reflections of Change in a Globalized World’, Nature and Culture 10 (2010).12 Film directed by Matthew Gandy (UK and Germany, 2017), 72 min., colour; Matthew Gandy (ed.), Natura Urbana: The Brachen of Berlin, collection of essays to accompany the DVD publication, with contributions by Susanne Hauser et al. (2019), naturaurbana.org.13 Gavid Gissen, Subnature: Architecture’s Other Environments (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2009).14 Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (New York: ARK Edition, 1966).15 Gandy, ‘Unintentional Landscapes’, op. cit. (note 10).16 Gilles Clément, ‘Third Landscape’, TEH Series on New Imaginaries #3, Trans Europe Halles (2003).17 Anita Bakshi and Frank Gallagher, ‘Design with Fourth Nature’, Journal of Landscape Architecture 15/2 (2020), 24–35.18 Kevin J. Beiler, Susan W. Simard and Daniel M. Durall, ‘Topology of Tree–mycorrhizal Fungus Interaction Networks in Weric and Mesic Douglas-fir Forests’, Journal of Ecology 103/3 (2015), 616–628.19 David H. McNear Jr, ‘The Rhizosphere: Roots, Soil and Everything In Between’, Nature Education Knowledge 4/3 (2013), 1.20 Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).21 Scott Gilbert, Jan Sapp and Alfred Tauber, ‘A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals’, The Quarterly Review of Biology 87/4 (2012), 325–341.22 Alfred I. Tauber, ‘The Immune System and Its Ecology’, Philosophy of Science 75/2 (2008), 224–245.23 Witoon Purahong et al., ‘City Life of Mycorrhizal and Wood-inhabiting Macrofungi: Importance of Urban Areas for Maintaining Fungal Biodiversity’, Landscape and Urban Planning 221 (2022).24 Michael Bonkowski, Cecile Villenave and Bryan Griffiths, ‘Rhizosphere Fauna: The Functional and Structural Diversity of Intimate Interactions of Soil Fauna with Plant Roots’, Plant Soil 321 (2009), 213–233.25 Kevin Beiler et al., ‘Architecture of the Wood-Wide Web: Rhizopogon spp. Genets Link Multiple Douglas-fir Cohorts’, New Phytologist 185 (2010), 543–553.26 Ferris Jabr, ‘The Social Life of Forests’, The New York Times, 3 December 2020.27 ‘“Finding the Mother Tree”: An Interview with Suzanne Simard’, Emergence Magazine, 26 October 2022, emergencemagazine.org/podcast/, 65 min.28 Lynn Margulis, Early Life (Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1982).29 Merlin Sheldrake, Entangled Life (New York: Random House, 2020).30 GEFA product description, gefafabritz.com/products/private-garden/endo-mycorrhiza-foliage-tree.html.31 Mark Nieuwenhuijsen et al. ‘Fifty Shades of Green: Pathway to Healthy Urban Living’, Epidemiology 28/1 (2017), 63–71.32 Takeshi Ichinohe, Iris K. Pang and Yosuke Kumamoto, ‘Microbiota Regulates Immune Defence Against Respiratory Tract Influenza A Virus Infection’, PNAS 108/13 (2011), 5354–5359.33 Jessica Stanhope, Martin F. Breed and Philip Weinstein, ‘Exposure to Greenspaces Could Reduce the High Global Burden of Pain’, Environmental Research 187 (2020).34 Jake M. Robinson and Anna Jorgensen, ‘Rekindling Old Friendships in New Landscapes: The Environment–Microbiome–Health Axis in the Realms of Landscape Research’, People and Nature 2/2 (2020), 339–349.35 Jack Gilbert and Josh Neufeld, ‘Life in a World without Microbes’, PLoS Biology 12 (2014).36 McNear ‘The Rhizosphere’, op. cit. (note 19).37 Jacob G. Mills et al., ‘Urban Habitat Restoration Provides a Human Health Benefit through Microbiome Rewilding: The Microbiome Rewilding Hypothesis’, Restoration Ecology 25 (2017), 866–872.38 Nicholas J. C. Gellie et al., ‘Revegetation Rewilds the Soil Bacterial Microbiome of an Old Field’, Molecular Ecology 26/11 (2017), 2895–2904.39 Zdravko Baruch, et al., ‘Increased Plant Species Richness Associates with Greater Soil Bacterial Diversity in Urban Green Spaces’, Environmental Research 196 (2021).40 Ehrenfried Pfeifer (1899–1961), German scientist, soil scientist, leading advocate of biodynamic agriculture, anthroposophist and student of Rudolf Steiner.41 Benjamin M. Ford et al., Paper Chromatography: An Inconsistent Tool for Assessing Soil Health’, Geoderma 383 (2021).42 Maria Olga Kokornaczyk et al., ‘Analysis of Soils by Means of Pfeiffer’s Circular Chromatography Test and Comparison to Chemical Analysis Results’, Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 33/3 (2017), 143–157.43 Graham Huggan, Colonialism, Culture, Whale: The Cetacean Quartet (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJorg SiewekeJorg Sieweke, licensed landscape architect and urban designer, directs his practice ParadoXcity in Berlin. He is an associate professor at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. He obtained his PhD from the TU Berlin in 2015; fellowships in Hamburg (DAAD, 2014) and Rome (Villa Massimo, 2015). He held academic appointments at the University of Virginia, the RWTH Aachen, the HCU Hamburg, the TU Berlin and the TU Dresden as well as at various Art Academies (ABK Stuttgart, UDK Berlin and Berlin-Weissensee).\",\"PeriodicalId\":43606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"volume\":\"273 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258726\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要“城市森林”一词是一个矛盾修饰法,并继续引发一系列令人震惊的问题。从苗圃将克隆树苗移植到城市的默认做法,几乎没有希望增加超过其受损树木的总和。相比之下,越来越多的人认识到城市休耕区未经批准的新兴森林植被。虽然文化地理学和城市生态学领域认识到这种无意的城市森林具有多层次的社会文化、生态和健康效益,但城市管理者、普通公众甚至景观设计师都不太愿意接受它们。然而,全球变暖的后果和随后城市生态的兴起要求对管理城市森林的当前挑战和潜力进行更新。公园项目可以通过采纳最近关于城市休耕土地上自然植被的城市生态学概念,如“原始”和“第四自然”,来扩展规范标准。本文批判性地回顾了传统的城市林业观念,驳斥了单一植树的做法。它质疑标准化的内涵和本土主义者对入侵物种的偏见,并认为自然植被有能力提供和扩展关键的网络,使其成为更具弹性和持久性的城市森林斑块。它探索了德国的案例,一般来说,尤其是柏林,以接地与新兴植被的相关性。它认为承认和利用林业科学在微生物生态学方面的最新发展,包括菌根和共生宏观/微观网络,这对景观设计很重要,对于提出更具弹性和健康的森林城市环境是必要的。我要感谢Kelly Shannon教授在编辑过程中所做的宝贵贡献。我要特别感谢微生物生态学家Jake M. Robinson博士作为顾问和工作室联合顾问所做的工作,以及我在挪威生命科学大学的研究助理Flora kiezling和Florian Opitz。这项工作是由挪威研究委员会“弹性空间”项目资助的。注1 Sonja dmpelmann, Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 21-42.2随着工业化的发展,柏林住房的快速增长是由英国工程师James Hobrecht构建的,他引入了下水道网络的布局,作为城市形式的电导乔安娜·迪恩,“看到树木,思考森林:20世纪60年代多伦多大学的城市林业”,见:Alan Mac-Eachern和William J. Turkel(主编),加拿大环境史的方法和意义(多伦多:Nelson, 2009)迪特尔·亨内波,园林和景观历史学家,1970,见:德·<s:1>佩尔曼,《看树》,同上(注1)Lara a . Roman和Frederick N. Scatena,“街道树木存活率:先前研究的meta分析和应用于美国费城的实地调查”,城市林业和城市绿化10(2011),269-274.7。Samuli Helama等人,“利用树木年轮和气候记录探索赫尔辛基城市松树的死亡率”,树木26 (2012),353-362;Ian A. Smith, Victoria K. Dearborn和Lucy R. Hutyra。“活得快,死得早:行道树的加速生长、死亡率和周转率”,《公共科学图书馆·综合》第14期(2019)10 . Ingo Kowarik,“城市与荒野:一个新的视角”,《国际荒野杂志》19/3 (2013),32-36.9Matthew Gandy,“无意识的景观”,景观研究41/4 (2016),433-440.11 Peter Del Tredici,“自发的城市植被:全球化世界变化的反映”,自然与文化10 (2010),12电影导演:马修·甘迪(英国和德国,2017),72分钟,彩色;Matthew Gandy(编),Natura Urbana: The Brachen of Berlin,随DVD出版的文集,Susanne Hauser等人(2019)的贡献,naturaurbana.org.13。Gavid Gissen, Subnature: Architecture’s Other Environments(纽约:普林斯顿建筑出版社,2009)玛丽·道格拉斯,《纯洁与危险:污染与禁忌概念分析》(纽约:ARK版,1966)甘迪,《无意的风景》,同上(注10)17 .吉尔斯·克莱门茨,“第三景观”,TEH系列新想象#3,跨欧洲Halles (2003)Anita Bakshi和Frank Gallagher,“与第四自然的设计”,Journal of Landscape Architecture 15/2 (2020), 24-35.18 Kevin J. Beiler, Susan W. Simard和Daniel M. Durall,“Weric和Mesic Douglas-fir森林中树-菌根真菌相互作用网络的拓扑结构”,Journal of Ecology 103/3 (2015), 616-628.19 David H. McNear Jr .,“根圈:根、土壤和两者之间的一切”,Nature Education Knowledge 4/3(2013), 1。 20查尔斯·泰勒,《自我的来源:现代身份的形成》(剑桥,马萨诸塞州:哈佛大学出版社,1989),第21页Scott Gilbert, Jan Sapp和Alfred Tauber,“生命的共生观点:我们从来都不是个体”,生物学季刊评论87/4 (2012),325-341.22 Alfred I. Tauber,“免疫系统及其生态学”,科学哲学75/2 (2008),224-245.23 Witoon Purahong等人,“菌根和木栖大型真菌的城市生活:城市地区对维持真菌生物多样性的重要性”,景观和城市规划221 (2022).24Michael Bonkowski, Cecile Villenave和Bryan Griffiths,“根际动物:土壤动物与植物根系密切相互作用的功能和结构多样性”,Plant Soil 321 (2009), 213-233.25 Kevin Beiler等人,“木材网络的架构:根状孢子虫的基因连接多个道格拉斯-fir群”,New phyologist 185 (2010), 543-553.26 Ferris Jabr,“森林的社会生活”,纽约时报,2020年12月3日“寻找母亲树”;《对苏珊娜·西马德的采访》,Emergence杂志,2022年10月26日,emergencemagazine.org/podcast/, 65分钟。28 Lynn Margulis,《早期生活》(Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1982)梅林·谢德拉克,《纠缠的生命》(纽约:兰登书屋,2020年)GEFA产品描述,gefafabritz.com/products/private-garden/endo-mycorrhiza-foliage-tree.html.31 Mark Nieuwenhuijsen等。《五十度绿:“健康城市生活之路”,流行病学28/1 (2017),63-71.32 Takeshi Ichinohe, Iris K. Pang和Yosuke Kumamoto,“微生物群调节呼吸道甲型流感病毒感染的免疫防御”,PNAS 108/13 (2011), 5354-5359.33 Jessica Stanhope, Martin F. Breed和Philip Weinstein,“暴露在绿色空间中可以减轻全球疼痛的高负担”,环境研究187 (2020).34杰克·m·罗宾逊和安娜·乔根森,“在新的景观中重新点燃旧友谊:景观研究领域的环境-微生物-健康轴”,《人与自然》第2/2(2020),339-349.35。杰克·吉尔伯特和乔希·纽菲尔德,“没有微生物的世界中的生活”,《公共科学图书馆·生物学》12 (2014)麦克尼尔的《根际》,同上(注19)。37Jacob G. Mills等人,“通过微生物群的恢复,城市栖息地恢复为人类健康提供了好处:Nicholas J. C. Gellie et al.,“植被恢复对旧农田土壤细菌微生物群的影响”,分子生态学26/11 (2017),2895-2904.39 Zdravko Baruch等,“增加植物物种丰富度与城市绿地土壤细菌多样性的关联”,环境研究196 (2021).40Ehrenfried Pfeifer(1899-1961),德国科学家,土壤学家,生物动力农业的主要倡导者,人类学家和Rudolf steiner的学生。41 Benjamin M. Ford等人,纸色谱:评估土壤健康的不一致工具”,Geoderma 383 (2021).42Maria Olga Kokornaczyk等人,“通过Pfeiffer的循环色谱测试分析土壤并与化学分析结果进行比较”,生物农业与园艺33/3 (2017),143-157.43 Graham Huggan,殖民主义,文化,鲸鱼:鲸类动物四头(伦敦:Bloomsbury, 2018)。jorg Sieweke,持牌景观建筑师和城市设计师,在柏林指导他的事务所ParadoXcity。他是挪威生命科学大学的副教授。2015年获柏林工业大学博士学位;汉堡(DAAD, 2014)和罗马(Villa Massimo, 2015)的奖学金。他曾在弗吉尼亚大学、亚琛工业大学、汉堡大学、柏林工业大学和德累斯顿工业大学以及各种艺术学院(ABK Stuttgart、UDK Berlin和Berlin- weissensee)担任学术职务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deliberate and less intentional urban forests
AbstractThe term ‘urban forest’ is an oxymoron and continues to provoke a staggering set of questions. The default practice of transplanting cloned saplings from nurseries into the city holds little promise of adding up to more than the sum of its destressed trees. In contrast, there is growing recognition of the unsanctioned emergent forest vegetation of urban fallows. While the fields of cultural geography and urban ecology recognize such unintentional urban forests for their layered sociocultural, ecological and health benefits, city administrators, the general public and even landscape architects have been slower to embrace them. However, consequences of global warming and the subsequent rise of urban ecology mandates an update regarding current challenges and potentials in managing urban forests. Park projects can expand the normative canon by embracing recent urban ecology concepts concerning spontaneous vegetation on fallow urban land, such as ‘ruderal’ and ‘fourth nature’. This paper critically reviews traditional notions of urban forestry and refutes the single tree planting approach. It questions standardized connotations and nativist biases towards invasive species and argues that spontaneous vegetation is well equipped to provide and expand critical networks to more resilient and enduring urban forest patches. It explores cases in Germany, in general, and Berlin, in particular, to ground the relevance for emergent vegetation. It considers the acknowledgment and utilization of recent developments in forestry science regarding microbial ecology, including the mycorrhizal and symbiotic macro/micro networks, important for landscape architecture and necessary to propose more resilient and healthy forested urban environments.Keywords: urban ecologymyceliumwood-wide-webmicrobiomeholobiont AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank professor Kelly Shannon for her invaluable contribution in the editing process. My special thanks go to Dr Jake M. Robinson, microbial ecologist, for his work as consultant and studio co-advisor, and my research assistants Flora Kießling and Florian Opitz at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. The work was funded through the Norwegian Research Council, project “spaces for resilience”.Notes1 Sonja Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New York City and Berlin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 21–42.2 Berlin’s rapid increase in housing along with the growth of industrialization was structured by British engineer James Hobrecht, who introduced the layout of the sewer network as the armature for urban form.3 Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1), 2.4 Joanna Dean, ‘Seeing Trees, Thinking Forests: Urban Forestry at the University of Toronto in the 1960s’, in: Alan Mac-Eachern and William J. Turkel (eds.), Method and Meaning in Canadian Environmental History (Toronto: Nelson, 2009).5 Dieter Hennebo, Garden and landscape historian, 1970, in: Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1).6 Lara A. Roman and Frederick N. Scatena, ‘Street Tree Survival Rates: Meta-analysis of Previous Studies and Application to a Field Survey in Philadelphia, PA, USA’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10 (2011), 269–274.7 Samuli Helama et al. ‘Mortality of Urban Pines in Helsinki Explored Using Tree Rings and Climate Records’, Trees 26 (2012), 353–362; Ian A. Smith, Victoria K. Dearborn and Lucy R. Hutyra. ‘Live Fast, Die Young: Accelerated Growth, Mortality, and Turnover in Street Trees’, PLoS ONE 14 (2019).8 Ingo Kowarik, ‘Cities and Wilderness: A New Perspective’, International Journal of Wilderness 19/3 (2013), 32–36.9 Peter Latz, Rust Red: The Landscape Park Duisburg-Nord (Munich: Hirmer, 2017).10 Matthew Gandy, ‘Unintentional Landscapes’, Landscape Research 41/4 (2016), 433–440.11 Peter Del Tredici, ‘Spontaneous Urban Vegetation: Reflections of Change in a Globalized World’, Nature and Culture 10 (2010).12 Film directed by Matthew Gandy (UK and Germany, 2017), 72 min., colour; Matthew Gandy (ed.), Natura Urbana: The Brachen of Berlin, collection of essays to accompany the DVD publication, with contributions by Susanne Hauser et al. (2019), naturaurbana.org.13 Gavid Gissen, Subnature: Architecture’s Other Environments (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2009).14 Mary Douglas, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (New York: ARK Edition, 1966).15 Gandy, ‘Unintentional Landscapes’, op. cit. (note 10).16 Gilles Clément, ‘Third Landscape’, TEH Series on New Imaginaries #3, Trans Europe Halles (2003).17 Anita Bakshi and Frank Gallagher, ‘Design with Fourth Nature’, Journal of Landscape Architecture 15/2 (2020), 24–35.18 Kevin J. Beiler, Susan W. Simard and Daniel M. Durall, ‘Topology of Tree–mycorrhizal Fungus Interaction Networks in Weric and Mesic Douglas-fir Forests’, Journal of Ecology 103/3 (2015), 616–628.19 David H. McNear Jr, ‘The Rhizosphere: Roots, Soil and Everything In Between’, Nature Education Knowledge 4/3 (2013), 1.20 Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).21 Scott Gilbert, Jan Sapp and Alfred Tauber, ‘A Symbiotic View of Life: We Have Never Been Individuals’, The Quarterly Review of Biology 87/4 (2012), 325–341.22 Alfred I. Tauber, ‘The Immune System and Its Ecology’, Philosophy of Science 75/2 (2008), 224–245.23 Witoon Purahong et al., ‘City Life of Mycorrhizal and Wood-inhabiting Macrofungi: Importance of Urban Areas for Maintaining Fungal Biodiversity’, Landscape and Urban Planning 221 (2022).24 Michael Bonkowski, Cecile Villenave and Bryan Griffiths, ‘Rhizosphere Fauna: The Functional and Structural Diversity of Intimate Interactions of Soil Fauna with Plant Roots’, Plant Soil 321 (2009), 213–233.25 Kevin Beiler et al., ‘Architecture of the Wood-Wide Web: Rhizopogon spp. Genets Link Multiple Douglas-fir Cohorts’, New Phytologist 185 (2010), 543–553.26 Ferris Jabr, ‘The Social Life of Forests’, The New York Times, 3 December 2020.27 ‘“Finding the Mother Tree”: An Interview with Suzanne Simard’, Emergence Magazine, 26 October 2022, emergencemagazine.org/podcast/, 65 min.28 Lynn Margulis, Early Life (Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1982).29 Merlin Sheldrake, Entangled Life (New York: Random House, 2020).30 GEFA product description, gefafabritz.com/products/private-garden/endo-mycorrhiza-foliage-tree.html.31 Mark Nieuwenhuijsen et al. ‘Fifty Shades of Green: Pathway to Healthy Urban Living’, Epidemiology 28/1 (2017), 63–71.32 Takeshi Ichinohe, Iris K. Pang and Yosuke Kumamoto, ‘Microbiota Regulates Immune Defence Against Respiratory Tract Influenza A Virus Infection’, PNAS 108/13 (2011), 5354–5359.33 Jessica Stanhope, Martin F. Breed and Philip Weinstein, ‘Exposure to Greenspaces Could Reduce the High Global Burden of Pain’, Environmental Research 187 (2020).34 Jake M. Robinson and Anna Jorgensen, ‘Rekindling Old Friendships in New Landscapes: The Environment–Microbiome–Health Axis in the Realms of Landscape Research’, People and Nature 2/2 (2020), 339–349.35 Jack Gilbert and Josh Neufeld, ‘Life in a World without Microbes’, PLoS Biology 12 (2014).36 McNear ‘The Rhizosphere’, op. cit. (note 19).37 Jacob G. Mills et al., ‘Urban Habitat Restoration Provides a Human Health Benefit through Microbiome Rewilding: The Microbiome Rewilding Hypothesis’, Restoration Ecology 25 (2017), 866–872.38 Nicholas J. C. Gellie et al., ‘Revegetation Rewilds the Soil Bacterial Microbiome of an Old Field’, Molecular Ecology 26/11 (2017), 2895–2904.39 Zdravko Baruch, et al., ‘Increased Plant Species Richness Associates with Greater Soil Bacterial Diversity in Urban Green Spaces’, Environmental Research 196 (2021).40 Ehrenfried Pfeifer (1899–1961), German scientist, soil scientist, leading advocate of biodynamic agriculture, anthroposophist and student of Rudolf Steiner.41 Benjamin M. Ford et al., Paper Chromatography: An Inconsistent Tool for Assessing Soil Health’, Geoderma 383 (2021).42 Maria Olga Kokornaczyk et al., ‘Analysis of Soils by Means of Pfeiffer’s Circular Chromatography Test and Comparison to Chemical Analysis Results’, Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 33/3 (2017), 143–157.43 Graham Huggan, Colonialism, Culture, Whale: The Cetacean Quartet (London: Bloomsbury, 2018).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJorg SiewekeJorg Sieweke, licensed landscape architect and urban designer, directs his practice ParadoXcity in Berlin. He is an associate professor at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. He obtained his PhD from the TU Berlin in 2015; fellowships in Hamburg (DAAD, 2014) and Rome (Villa Massimo, 2015). He held academic appointments at the University of Virginia, the RWTH Aachen, the HCU Hamburg, the TU Berlin and the TU Dresden as well as at various Art Academies (ABK Stuttgart, UDK Berlin and Berlin-Weissensee).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: JoLA is the academic Journal of the European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools (ECLAS), established in 2006. It is published three times a year. JoLA aims to support, stimulate, and extend scholarly debate in Landscape Architecture and related fields. It also gives space to the reflective practitioner and to design research. The journal welcomes articles addressing any aspect of Landscape Architecture, to cultivate the diverse identity of the discipline. JoLA is internationally oriented and seeks to both draw in and contribute to global perspectives through its four key sections: the ‘Articles’ section features both academic scholarship and research related to professional practice; the ‘Under the Sky’ section fosters research based on critical analysis and interpretation of built projects; the ‘Thinking Eye’ section presents research based on thoughtful experimentation in visual methodologies and media; the ‘Review’ section presents critical reflection on recent literature, conferences and/or exhibitions relevant to Landscape Architecture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信