基于mcda的撒丁岛生物甲烷生成和利用评估

IF 1.4 Q4 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Carla Asquer, Francesco Romagnoli
{"title":"基于mcda的撒丁岛生物甲烷生成和利用评估","authors":"Carla Asquer, Francesco Romagnoli","doi":"10.2478/rtuect-2023-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The selection of a local and sustainable use of biogas, and biogas feedstocks, towards the upgrading process to biomethane, is a key aspect towards more consistent energy planning within the frame of the EU Green Deal and Sustainable Development Goals. In this paper, four biomethane production and utilization pathways were assessed in the view of economic, environmental, technological, and social dimensions compared to a reference scenario in which direct biogas use in a cogeneration unit is assumed. The technologies analyzed included membrane systems, amine scrubbing, water scrubbing, and biological methanation, regarding the Sardinian context. The impact assessment was carried out using the TOPSIS method. As an output, thirteen consistent indicators reflecting the holistic aspect of sustainability were designed and proposed based on an in-depth literature review and the authors’ technological knowledge. The results show that the reference scenario was the preferable one. In terms of environmental and social considerations, biological methanation emerged as the most environmentally and socially responsible alternative. From the economic perspective, all the upgrading options depicted similar results. The technological-oriented weighting showed that the two most widespread upgrading options highlighted the optimal results.","PeriodicalId":46053,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Climate Technologies","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A MCDA-Based Assessment of Biomethane Generation and Use in Sardinia\",\"authors\":\"Carla Asquer, Francesco Romagnoli\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rtuect-2023-0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The selection of a local and sustainable use of biogas, and biogas feedstocks, towards the upgrading process to biomethane, is a key aspect towards more consistent energy planning within the frame of the EU Green Deal and Sustainable Development Goals. In this paper, four biomethane production and utilization pathways were assessed in the view of economic, environmental, technological, and social dimensions compared to a reference scenario in which direct biogas use in a cogeneration unit is assumed. The technologies analyzed included membrane systems, amine scrubbing, water scrubbing, and biological methanation, regarding the Sardinian context. The impact assessment was carried out using the TOPSIS method. As an output, thirteen consistent indicators reflecting the holistic aspect of sustainability were designed and proposed based on an in-depth literature review and the authors’ technological knowledge. The results show that the reference scenario was the preferable one. In terms of environmental and social considerations, biological methanation emerged as the most environmentally and socially responsible alternative. From the economic perspective, all the upgrading options depicted similar results. The technological-oriented weighting showed that the two most widespread upgrading options highlighted the optimal results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Climate Technologies\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Climate Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Climate Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2023-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧盟绿色协议和可持续发展目标的框架内,选择本地和可持续利用的沼气和沼气原料,以升级为生物甲烷,是实现更一致的能源规划的关键方面。本文从经济、环境、技术和社会方面对四种生物甲烷的生产和利用途径进行了评估,并与假设在热电联产装置中直接使用沼气的参考情景进行了比较。根据撒丁岛的环境,分析的技术包括膜系统、胺洗涤、水洗涤和生物甲烷化。采用TOPSIS法进行影响评价。作为一项产出,基于深入的文献回顾和作者的技术知识,设计并提出了13个反映可持续性整体方面的一致指标。结果表明,参考方案是比较理想的方案。在环境和社会考虑方面,生物甲烷化成为对环境和社会最负责任的替代方案。从经济角度来看,所有的升级方案都描绘了类似的结果。面向技术的加权表明,两种最广泛的升级选择突出了最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A MCDA-Based Assessment of Biomethane Generation and Use in Sardinia
Abstract The selection of a local and sustainable use of biogas, and biogas feedstocks, towards the upgrading process to biomethane, is a key aspect towards more consistent energy planning within the frame of the EU Green Deal and Sustainable Development Goals. In this paper, four biomethane production and utilization pathways were assessed in the view of economic, environmental, technological, and social dimensions compared to a reference scenario in which direct biogas use in a cogeneration unit is assumed. The technologies analyzed included membrane systems, amine scrubbing, water scrubbing, and biological methanation, regarding the Sardinian context. The impact assessment was carried out using the TOPSIS method. As an output, thirteen consistent indicators reflecting the holistic aspect of sustainability were designed and proposed based on an in-depth literature review and the authors’ technological knowledge. The results show that the reference scenario was the preferable one. In terms of environmental and social considerations, biological methanation emerged as the most environmentally and socially responsible alternative. From the economic perspective, all the upgrading options depicted similar results. The technological-oriented weighting showed that the two most widespread upgrading options highlighted the optimal results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Climate Technologies
Environmental and Climate Technologies GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Climate Technologies provides a forum for information on innovation, research and development in the areas of environmental science, energy resources and processes, innovative technologies and energy efficiency. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts which cover the range from bioeconomy, sustainable technology development, life cycle analysis, eco-design, climate change mitigation, innovative solutions for pollution reduction to resilience, the energy efficiency of buildings, secure and sustainable energy supplies. The Journal ensures international publicity for original research and innovative work. A variety of themes are covered through a multi-disciplinary approach, one which integrates all aspects of environmental science: -Sustainability of technology development- Bioeconomy- Cleaner production, end of pipe production- Zero emission technologies- Eco-design- Life cycle analysis- Eco-efficiency- Environmental impact assessment- Environmental management systems- Resilience- Energy and carbon markets- Greenhouse gas emission reduction and climate technologies- Methodologies for the evaluation of sustainability- Renewable energy resources- Solar, wind, geothermal, hydro energy, biomass sources: algae, wood, straw, biogas, energetic plants and organic waste- Waste management- Quality of outdoor and indoor environment- Environmental monitoring and evaluation- Heat and power generation, including district heating and/or cooling- Energy efficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信