在线,离线,还是两者都有?商业教练中教练形式对副作用的重要性

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Natalie M. Michalik, Carsten C. Schermuly
{"title":"在线,离线,还是两者都有?商业教练中教练形式对副作用的重要性","authors":"Natalie M. Michalik, Carsten C. Schermuly","doi":"10.1108/jmp-01-2023-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, in recent years, face-to-face coaching has largely shifted to online coaching. The authors examined both the side effects of and coaching success in face-to-face, blended and online coaching from both coaches' and clients' perspectives. This paper aims to discuss the aforementioned examination. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted two independent studies to examine the differences between the side effects of face-to-face, blended and online coaching. In Study 1 ( N = 119), the authors compared the side effects of these formats using a quasi-experimental design and tested differences in perceived coaching success from the coaches' perspective. In Study 2 ( N = 104), the authors integrated the client perspective on the side effects of coaching formats into the design and tested the differences. Findings Coaches in the face-to-face format experienced a significantly lower prevalence of side effects for their clients compared to coaches who engaged in the blended and online coaching formats. From the client perspective, clients experienced the most side effects of the blended coaching format. Neither study showed any differences between the coaching formats in perceived coaching success. Practical implications The results provide guidance to practitioners in choosing the most suitable coaching format for themselves. Being aware of side effects in coaching can help both coaches and clients take appropriate measures to mitigate the impact of these effects. Originality/value This paper is the first to expand knowledge about side effects in coaching across different coaching formats from both coaches' and clients' perspectives. The findings provide evidence regarding the context in which coaching is currently performed in a post-COVID world, with sustainability remaining a global concern and a key driver for organizations.","PeriodicalId":48247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online, offline, or both? The importance of coaching format for side effects in business coaching\",\"authors\":\"Natalie M. Michalik, Carsten C. Schermuly\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmp-01-2023-0068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, in recent years, face-to-face coaching has largely shifted to online coaching. The authors examined both the side effects of and coaching success in face-to-face, blended and online coaching from both coaches' and clients' perspectives. This paper aims to discuss the aforementioned examination. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted two independent studies to examine the differences between the side effects of face-to-face, blended and online coaching. In Study 1 ( N = 119), the authors compared the side effects of these formats using a quasi-experimental design and tested differences in perceived coaching success from the coaches' perspective. In Study 2 ( N = 104), the authors integrated the client perspective on the side effects of coaching formats into the design and tested the differences. Findings Coaches in the face-to-face format experienced a significantly lower prevalence of side effects for their clients compared to coaches who engaged in the blended and online coaching formats. From the client perspective, clients experienced the most side effects of the blended coaching format. Neither study showed any differences between the coaching formats in perceived coaching success. Practical implications The results provide guidance to practitioners in choosing the most suitable coaching format for themselves. Being aware of side effects in coaching can help both coaches and clients take appropriate measures to mitigate the impact of these effects. Originality/value This paper is the first to expand knowledge about side effects in coaching across different coaching formats from both coaches' and clients' perspectives. The findings provide evidence regarding the context in which coaching is currently performed in a post-COVID world, with sustainability remaining a global concern and a key driver for organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Managerial Psychology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Managerial Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-01-2023-0068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-01-2023-0068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,受COVID-19大流行的影响,面对面培训在很大程度上已转向在线培训。作者从教练和客户的角度分析了面对面、混合式和在线教练的副作用和成功的教练。本文旨在对上述检验进行探讨。设计/方法/方法作者进行了两项独立的研究,以检查面对面,混合和在线教练的副作用之间的差异。在研究1 (N = 119)中,作者使用准实验设计比较了这些形式的副作用,并从教练的角度测试了感知教练成功的差异。在研究2 (N = 104)中,作者将客户对教练形式副作用的看法纳入设计,并测试了差异。与从事混合和在线教练形式的教练相比,面对面教练对客户的副作用发生率明显较低。从客户的角度来看,客户经历了混合教练形式的最大副作用。两项研究都没有显示教练形式在感知教练成功方面的任何差异。实际意义研究结果为从业者选择最适合自己的教练形式提供了指导。意识到教练的副作用可以帮助教练和客户采取适当的措施来减轻这些影响。原创性/价值本文首次从教练和客户的角度扩展了关于不同教练形式下教练副作用的知识。调查结果为后covid世界中目前进行培训的背景提供了证据,可持续性仍然是全球关注的问题,也是组织的关键驱动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online, offline, or both? The importance of coaching format for side effects in business coaching
Purpose Accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, in recent years, face-to-face coaching has largely shifted to online coaching. The authors examined both the side effects of and coaching success in face-to-face, blended and online coaching from both coaches' and clients' perspectives. This paper aims to discuss the aforementioned examination. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted two independent studies to examine the differences between the side effects of face-to-face, blended and online coaching. In Study 1 ( N = 119), the authors compared the side effects of these formats using a quasi-experimental design and tested differences in perceived coaching success from the coaches' perspective. In Study 2 ( N = 104), the authors integrated the client perspective on the side effects of coaching formats into the design and tested the differences. Findings Coaches in the face-to-face format experienced a significantly lower prevalence of side effects for their clients compared to coaches who engaged in the blended and online coaching formats. From the client perspective, clients experienced the most side effects of the blended coaching format. Neither study showed any differences between the coaching formats in perceived coaching success. Practical implications The results provide guidance to practitioners in choosing the most suitable coaching format for themselves. Being aware of side effects in coaching can help both coaches and clients take appropriate measures to mitigate the impact of these effects. Originality/value This paper is the first to expand knowledge about side effects in coaching across different coaching formats from both coaches' and clients' perspectives. The findings provide evidence regarding the context in which coaching is currently performed in a post-COVID world, with sustainability remaining a global concern and a key driver for organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: ■Communication and its influence on action ■Developments in leadership styles ■How managers achieve success ■How work design affects job motivation ■Influences on managerial priorities and time allocation ■Managing conflicts ■The decision-making process in Eastern and Western business cultures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信