脊柱手术中全麻与无区域成分全麻的竖肌脊柱平面阻滞比较:前瞻性随机对照试验

M Barsa
{"title":"脊柱手术中全麻与无区域成分全麻的竖肌脊柱平面阻滞比较:前瞻性随机对照试验","authors":"M Barsa","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.3(104).2023.287870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Spine surgery is a complex and traumatic surgical intervention that require sufficient anaesthesia supplementation. Erector spine plane block (ESPB) is an effective method of reducing pain intensity, but there is insufficient data on its effect on hemodynamic parameters, blood loss and possible complications.
 Aim. Compare the impact of ESPB as a component of combined anaesthesia with general anaesthesia without regional component on amount of opiates, blood loss and infusion therapy intraoperatively, intensity of pain postoperatively, to study the consequence of the two methods of anaesthesia on hemodynamic parameters, the time of weaning from artificial ventilation and the duration of hospitalization.
 Materials and methods. 151 patients underwent spine surgery. Depending on the method of analgesia, patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – general anaesthesia with ESPB, group 2 – general anaesthesia alone. Primary outcomes: intensity of pain at rest and during movements after surgery 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery, duration of hospitalization, time of weaning from the ventilator. Secondary outcomes: amount of fentanyl used intraoperatively and morphine postoperatively, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), blood loss, diuresis, and infusion therapy during surgery.
 Results. The intensity of pain at rest and during movement after surgery was significantly lower in group 1. The duration of hospitalization and ventilation was longer in group 2. The amount of opiates intra- and postoperatively was lower in group 1. HR, MBP, blood loss and infusion therapy were higher in group 2. Diuresis did not differ in both groups.
 Conclusion. ESPB as a component of combined anaesthesia reduces the intensity of pain at all stages of observation after surgery, decrease amount of opiates, duration of artificial ventilation and hospitalization. ESPB diminish HR and SBP, minimize blood loss and infusion therapy without affecting diuresis.","PeriodicalId":487491,"journal":{"name":"Bìlʹ, znebolûvannâ ì ìntensivna terapìâ","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ERECTOR SPINE PLANE BLOCK WITH GENERAL ANAESTHESIA COMPARED WITH GENERAL ANAESTHESIA WITHOUT REGIONAL COMPONENT FOR SPINE SURGERY: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL\",\"authors\":\"M Barsa\",\"doi\":\"10.25284/2519-2078.3(104).2023.287870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Spine surgery is a complex and traumatic surgical intervention that require sufficient anaesthesia supplementation. Erector spine plane block (ESPB) is an effective method of reducing pain intensity, but there is insufficient data on its effect on hemodynamic parameters, blood loss and possible complications.
 Aim. Compare the impact of ESPB as a component of combined anaesthesia with general anaesthesia without regional component on amount of opiates, blood loss and infusion therapy intraoperatively, intensity of pain postoperatively, to study the consequence of the two methods of anaesthesia on hemodynamic parameters, the time of weaning from artificial ventilation and the duration of hospitalization.
 Materials and methods. 151 patients underwent spine surgery. Depending on the method of analgesia, patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – general anaesthesia with ESPB, group 2 – general anaesthesia alone. Primary outcomes: intensity of pain at rest and during movements after surgery 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery, duration of hospitalization, time of weaning from the ventilator. Secondary outcomes: amount of fentanyl used intraoperatively and morphine postoperatively, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), blood loss, diuresis, and infusion therapy during surgery.
 Results. The intensity of pain at rest and during movement after surgery was significantly lower in group 1. The duration of hospitalization and ventilation was longer in group 2. The amount of opiates intra- and postoperatively was lower in group 1. HR, MBP, blood loss and infusion therapy were higher in group 2. Diuresis did not differ in both groups.
 Conclusion. ESPB as a component of combined anaesthesia reduces the intensity of pain at all stages of observation after surgery, decrease amount of opiates, duration of artificial ventilation and hospitalization. ESPB diminish HR and SBP, minimize blood loss and infusion therapy without affecting diuresis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":487491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bìlʹ, znebolûvannâ ì ìntensivna terapìâ\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bìlʹ, znebolûvannâ ì ìntensivna terapìâ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.3(104).2023.287870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bìlʹ, znebolûvannâ ì ìntensivna terapìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.3(104).2023.287870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。脊柱外科是一种复杂的创伤性手术,需要充分的麻醉补充。直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)是一种有效的减轻疼痛强度的方法,但关于其对血流动力学参数、失血和可能的并发症的影响的数据不足。的目标。比较ESPB与全麻联合麻醉对术中阿片类药物用量、术中失血量及输注量、术后疼痛强度的影响,研究两种麻醉方式对血流动力学参数、人工通气脱机时间及住院时间的影响。 材料和方法。151例患者接受了脊柱手术。根据不同的镇痛方法,将患者分为两组:1组-全身麻醉联合ESPB, 2组-全身麻醉单独。主要结局:术后6、12、24、36、48小时静息和运动时疼痛强度、住院时间、脱离呼吸机时间。次要结局:术中芬太尼用量、术后吗啡用量、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、失血量、利尿、术中输注治疗。 结果。术后静息和运动时疼痛强度1组明显降低。2组住院时间和通气时间较长。1组患者术中、术后阿片类药物用量均较对照组低。HR、MBP、出血量及输液治疗均高于对照组。两组利尿无差异。 结论。ESPB作为联合麻醉的组成部分,可降低术后各观察阶段的疼痛强度,减少阿片类药物用量、人工通气时间和住院时间。ESPB降低HR和收缩压,减少失血量和输液治疗,不影响利尿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ERECTOR SPINE PLANE BLOCK WITH GENERAL ANAESTHESIA COMPARED WITH GENERAL ANAESTHESIA WITHOUT REGIONAL COMPONENT FOR SPINE SURGERY: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Background. Spine surgery is a complex and traumatic surgical intervention that require sufficient anaesthesia supplementation. Erector spine plane block (ESPB) is an effective method of reducing pain intensity, but there is insufficient data on its effect on hemodynamic parameters, blood loss and possible complications. Aim. Compare the impact of ESPB as a component of combined anaesthesia with general anaesthesia without regional component on amount of opiates, blood loss and infusion therapy intraoperatively, intensity of pain postoperatively, to study the consequence of the two methods of anaesthesia on hemodynamic parameters, the time of weaning from artificial ventilation and the duration of hospitalization. Materials and methods. 151 patients underwent spine surgery. Depending on the method of analgesia, patients were divided into two groups: group 1 – general anaesthesia with ESPB, group 2 – general anaesthesia alone. Primary outcomes: intensity of pain at rest and during movements after surgery 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 hours after surgery, duration of hospitalization, time of weaning from the ventilator. Secondary outcomes: amount of fentanyl used intraoperatively and morphine postoperatively, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), blood loss, diuresis, and infusion therapy during surgery. Results. The intensity of pain at rest and during movement after surgery was significantly lower in group 1. The duration of hospitalization and ventilation was longer in group 2. The amount of opiates intra- and postoperatively was lower in group 1. HR, MBP, blood loss and infusion therapy were higher in group 2. Diuresis did not differ in both groups. Conclusion. ESPB as a component of combined anaesthesia reduces the intensity of pain at all stages of observation after surgery, decrease amount of opiates, duration of artificial ventilation and hospitalization. ESPB diminish HR and SBP, minimize blood loss and infusion therapy without affecting diuresis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信