反对持有麻醉品的重罪

Muhammad Djaelani
{"title":"反对持有麻醉品的重罪","authors":"Muhammad Djaelani","doi":"10.35457/supremasi.v13i2.3054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to provide a prescription regarding criminal objections regarding possession of narcotics. This research is normative research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials are laws, court decisions, and other official legal publications. The results of this research answer that legal advisors need efforts to build legal arguments based on 2 (two) things, namely existing facts and the application of the law. First, the existing facts attached to Rusdiadi must be tested again. Second, in the application of the law, there is a discrepancy in the application of Article 185 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the absence of Article 127 of the Narcotics Law, and a discrepancy in the application of Article 55 of the Criminal Code. Finally, reconstruction before taking legal action is very necessary for the defendant to examine the facts and the application of the law.","PeriodicalId":499908,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Supremasi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keberatan Pidana Perihal Kepemilikan Narkotika\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Djaelani\",\"doi\":\"10.35457/supremasi.v13i2.3054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to provide a prescription regarding criminal objections regarding possession of narcotics. This research is normative research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials are laws, court decisions, and other official legal publications. The results of this research answer that legal advisors need efforts to build legal arguments based on 2 (two) things, namely existing facts and the application of the law. First, the existing facts attached to Rusdiadi must be tested again. Second, in the application of the law, there is a discrepancy in the application of Article 185 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the absence of Article 127 of the Narcotics Law, and a discrepancy in the application of Article 55 of the Criminal Code. Finally, reconstruction before taking legal action is very necessary for the defendant to examine the facts and the application of the law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Supremasi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Supremasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i2.3054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Supremasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v13i2.3054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在为持有毒品的刑事异议提供一个处方。本研究是一种采用法定方法和案例方法的规范性研究。法律资料是指法律、法院判决和其他官方法律出版物。本研究的结果回答了法律顾问需要努力建立基于两件事的法律论据,即存在的事实和法律的适用。首先,必须再次检验与鲁斯迪亚迪有关的现有事实。其次,在法律适用上,《刑事诉讼法》第185条的适用存在差异,《麻醉品法》第127条的缺失,《刑法》第55条的适用存在差异。最后,在采取法律行动之前,重构对于被告审查事实和法律适用是非常必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keberatan Pidana Perihal Kepemilikan Narkotika
This research aims to provide a prescription regarding criminal objections regarding possession of narcotics. This research is normative research with a statutory approach and a case approach. Legal materials are laws, court decisions, and other official legal publications. The results of this research answer that legal advisors need efforts to build legal arguments based on 2 (two) things, namely existing facts and the application of the law. First, the existing facts attached to Rusdiadi must be tested again. Second, in the application of the law, there is a discrepancy in the application of Article 185 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the absence of Article 127 of the Narcotics Law, and a discrepancy in the application of Article 55 of the Criminal Code. Finally, reconstruction before taking legal action is very necessary for the defendant to examine the facts and the application of the law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信