父母缺席的社会溢出效应:中国农村留守儿童对家庭人力资本投资的课堂同伴效应

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Xiaodong Zheng, Yanran Zhou
{"title":"父母缺席的社会溢出效应:中国农村留守儿童对家庭人力资本投资的课堂同伴效应","authors":"Xiaodong Zheng, Yanran Zhou","doi":"10.1080/00220388.2023.2255719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWhile the human capital consequences of rural-to-urban migration on left-behind children have been well-documented in developing countries, there is limited evidence regarding the social spillovers of parental migration on households without parent-child separation. This study investigates the effects of migration-induced left-behind children on household human capital investments in their non-left-behind peers. Leveraging the random student-class assignment within middle schools in rural China, we find that the share of left-behind children in class has significant negative impacts on household financial and time investments in non-left-behind classmates, especially out-of-school education expenditure. We also find heterogeneous effects demonstrating that the adverse spillovers are relatively larger among students who are boys, in grade nine, and from low socioeconomic status families. Further, our results suggest that exposure to left-behind classmates adversely affects non-left-behind students’ perceived quality of school life, cognitive and noncognitive skills, and their parents’ beliefs about returns of human capital investments. We interpret these findings as candidate mechanisms underlying the associations between parental absence and household investments in non-left-behind children. Our study sheds new light on the ‘costs’ of rural-to-urban migration in sending areas, which include not only welfare loss to families being left behind but negative spillover effects on non-left-behind households.Keywords: parental absenceleft-behind childrenhousehold human capital investmentspeer effectsrural China AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank anonymous referees and editors for their constructive comments. The data and codes used for this study are available upon request.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See Zheng et al. (Citation2022) for a literature review on the effects of parental migration on the short- and long-term human capital of left-behind children.2 See Supplementary Materials for more details about the sampling design of the CEPS.3 Given that the individual himself is removed from the ‘urn’ (the same grade) from which his peers are chosen, the peers for LBC are selected from a group with a slightly lower proportion of LBC than the peers for non-LBC. As a result, there is a mechanical negative relationship between one’s left-behind status and the share of LBC of randomly-assigned peers. According to Guryan et al. (Citation2009), such a bias could be corrected by simply controlling for the proportion of LBC of all individuals in the ‘urn’.4 The kernel distribution and descriptive statistics of class-level LBC proportion are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.5 We conduct seemingly unrelated estimations for the subsamples and statistically test the between-group differences in coefficients of the LBC variable (the proportion of LBC in a class).6 Using the predetermined academic record in grade six, instead of contemporary test scores, helps address potential simultaneity issues. We have also used contemporary test scores on subjects of Chinese, mathematics, and English to compute students’ ranking distance. The results remain qualitatively similar, which are available upon request.7 We have also examined the associations between the proportion of LBC in class and each item of the parental ‘demandingness’ index and ‘responsiveness’ index. As shown in Supplementary Materials Table S3 and Table S4, the estimation results remain qualitatively similar.8 The kernel distribution and descriptive statistics of the proportion of LBC in class using alternative definitions of LBC are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S2.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [72003173, 72103182]; Humanities and Social Science Fund of the Ministry of Education of China [21YJC790171]; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LY21G030008]; Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2023M730715], and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [XR202206]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.","PeriodicalId":48295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Spillovers of Parental Absence: The Classroom Peer Effects of ‘Left-behind’ Children on Household Human Capital Investments in Rural China\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodong Zheng, Yanran Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220388.2023.2255719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractWhile the human capital consequences of rural-to-urban migration on left-behind children have been well-documented in developing countries, there is limited evidence regarding the social spillovers of parental migration on households without parent-child separation. This study investigates the effects of migration-induced left-behind children on household human capital investments in their non-left-behind peers. Leveraging the random student-class assignment within middle schools in rural China, we find that the share of left-behind children in class has significant negative impacts on household financial and time investments in non-left-behind classmates, especially out-of-school education expenditure. We also find heterogeneous effects demonstrating that the adverse spillovers are relatively larger among students who are boys, in grade nine, and from low socioeconomic status families. Further, our results suggest that exposure to left-behind classmates adversely affects non-left-behind students’ perceived quality of school life, cognitive and noncognitive skills, and their parents’ beliefs about returns of human capital investments. We interpret these findings as candidate mechanisms underlying the associations between parental absence and household investments in non-left-behind children. Our study sheds new light on the ‘costs’ of rural-to-urban migration in sending areas, which include not only welfare loss to families being left behind but negative spillover effects on non-left-behind households.Keywords: parental absenceleft-behind childrenhousehold human capital investmentspeer effectsrural China AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank anonymous referees and editors for their constructive comments. The data and codes used for this study are available upon request.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See Zheng et al. (Citation2022) for a literature review on the effects of parental migration on the short- and long-term human capital of left-behind children.2 See Supplementary Materials for more details about the sampling design of the CEPS.3 Given that the individual himself is removed from the ‘urn’ (the same grade) from which his peers are chosen, the peers for LBC are selected from a group with a slightly lower proportion of LBC than the peers for non-LBC. As a result, there is a mechanical negative relationship between one’s left-behind status and the share of LBC of randomly-assigned peers. According to Guryan et al. (Citation2009), such a bias could be corrected by simply controlling for the proportion of LBC of all individuals in the ‘urn’.4 The kernel distribution and descriptive statistics of class-level LBC proportion are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.5 We conduct seemingly unrelated estimations for the subsamples and statistically test the between-group differences in coefficients of the LBC variable (the proportion of LBC in a class).6 Using the predetermined academic record in grade six, instead of contemporary test scores, helps address potential simultaneity issues. We have also used contemporary test scores on subjects of Chinese, mathematics, and English to compute students’ ranking distance. The results remain qualitatively similar, which are available upon request.7 We have also examined the associations between the proportion of LBC in class and each item of the parental ‘demandingness’ index and ‘responsiveness’ index. As shown in Supplementary Materials Table S3 and Table S4, the estimation results remain qualitatively similar.8 The kernel distribution and descriptive statistics of the proportion of LBC in class using alternative definitions of LBC are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S2.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [72003173, 72103182]; Humanities and Social Science Fund of the Ministry of Education of China [21YJC790171]; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LY21G030008]; Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2023M730715], and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [XR202206]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2023.2255719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2023.2255719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在发展中国家,虽然农村向城市迁移对留守儿童的人力资本影响已经得到了充分的记录,但关于父母迁移对没有亲子分离的家庭的社会溢出效应的证据有限。本研究探讨了移民导致的留守儿童对非留守儿童家庭人力资本投资的影响。利用中国农村中学的随机学生-班级分配,我们发现留守儿童在班级中的比例对家庭对非留守同学的财务和时间投入,特别是校外教育支出具有显著的负向影响。我们还发现异质性效应表明,负面溢出效应在男孩、九年级学生和来自低社会经济地位家庭的学生中相对较大。此外,我们的研究结果表明,接触留守同学会对非留守学生的学校生活质量、认知和非认知技能以及父母对人力资本投资回报的看法产生负面影响。我们将这些发现解释为父母缺席与家庭对非留守儿童投资之间关联的候选机制。我们的研究揭示了移民输出国农村向城市迁移的“成本”,其中不仅包括留守家庭的福利损失,还包括对非留守家庭的负面溢出效应。关键词:父母缺席;留守儿童;家庭人力资本投资;本研究使用的数据和代码可根据要求提供。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1:父母迁移对留守儿童短期和长期人力资本影响的文献综述见Zheng等(Citation2022)有关ceps抽样设计的更多详细信息,请参阅补充材料。3考虑到个体本身从选择其同伴的“urn”(同一等级)中移除,LBC的同伴是从LBC比例略低于非LBC的同伴的群体中选择的。因此,一个人的留守地位与随机分配的同伴的LBC份额之间存在机械的负相关关系。根据Guryan等人(Citation2009)的说法,这种偏差可以通过简单地控制“瓮”中所有个体的LBC比例来纠正类水平LBC比例的核分布和描述性统计见补充资料图S1.5。我们对子样本进行了看似无关的估计,并统计检验了LBC变量(LBC在一个类中所占的比例)系数的组间差异使用六年级的预定学习成绩,而不是当代的考试成绩,有助于解决潜在的同时性问题。我们还使用语文、数学和英语科目的当代考试成绩来计算学生的排名距离。结果在质量上保持相似,可应要求提供我们还研究了课堂上LBC的比例与父母“要求”指数和“反应”指数各项目之间的关系。如补充资料表S3和表S4所示,估计结果在质量上保持相似使用不同的LBC定义,类中LBC比例的核分布和描述性统计如图S2所示。基金资助:国家自然科学基金[72003173,72103182];教育部人文社科基金[21YJC790171];浙江省自然科学基金项目[LY21G030008];中国博士后科学基金[2023M730715]和浙江省省属高校基本科研业务费专项基金[XR202206]资助项目。资助者在研究设计、数据收集和分析、发表决定或手稿准备方面没有任何作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Spillovers of Parental Absence: The Classroom Peer Effects of ‘Left-behind’ Children on Household Human Capital Investments in Rural China
AbstractWhile the human capital consequences of rural-to-urban migration on left-behind children have been well-documented in developing countries, there is limited evidence regarding the social spillovers of parental migration on households without parent-child separation. This study investigates the effects of migration-induced left-behind children on household human capital investments in their non-left-behind peers. Leveraging the random student-class assignment within middle schools in rural China, we find that the share of left-behind children in class has significant negative impacts on household financial and time investments in non-left-behind classmates, especially out-of-school education expenditure. We also find heterogeneous effects demonstrating that the adverse spillovers are relatively larger among students who are boys, in grade nine, and from low socioeconomic status families. Further, our results suggest that exposure to left-behind classmates adversely affects non-left-behind students’ perceived quality of school life, cognitive and noncognitive skills, and their parents’ beliefs about returns of human capital investments. We interpret these findings as candidate mechanisms underlying the associations between parental absence and household investments in non-left-behind children. Our study sheds new light on the ‘costs’ of rural-to-urban migration in sending areas, which include not only welfare loss to families being left behind but negative spillover effects on non-left-behind households.Keywords: parental absenceleft-behind childrenhousehold human capital investmentspeer effectsrural China AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank anonymous referees and editors for their constructive comments. The data and codes used for this study are available upon request.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See Zheng et al. (Citation2022) for a literature review on the effects of parental migration on the short- and long-term human capital of left-behind children.2 See Supplementary Materials for more details about the sampling design of the CEPS.3 Given that the individual himself is removed from the ‘urn’ (the same grade) from which his peers are chosen, the peers for LBC are selected from a group with a slightly lower proportion of LBC than the peers for non-LBC. As a result, there is a mechanical negative relationship between one’s left-behind status and the share of LBC of randomly-assigned peers. According to Guryan et al. (Citation2009), such a bias could be corrected by simply controlling for the proportion of LBC of all individuals in the ‘urn’.4 The kernel distribution and descriptive statistics of class-level LBC proportion are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.5 We conduct seemingly unrelated estimations for the subsamples and statistically test the between-group differences in coefficients of the LBC variable (the proportion of LBC in a class).6 Using the predetermined academic record in grade six, instead of contemporary test scores, helps address potential simultaneity issues. We have also used contemporary test scores on subjects of Chinese, mathematics, and English to compute students’ ranking distance. The results remain qualitatively similar, which are available upon request.7 We have also examined the associations between the proportion of LBC in class and each item of the parental ‘demandingness’ index and ‘responsiveness’ index. As shown in Supplementary Materials Table S3 and Table S4, the estimation results remain qualitatively similar.8 The kernel distribution and descriptive statistics of the proportion of LBC in class using alternative definitions of LBC are shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S2.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [72003173, 72103182]; Humanities and Social Science Fund of the Ministry of Education of China [21YJC790171]; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China [LY21G030008]; Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2023M730715], and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [XR202206]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
期刊介绍: The Journal of Development Studies was the first and is one of the best known international journals in the area of development studies. Since its foundation in 1964, it has published many seminal articles on development and opened up new areas of debate. Priority is given to papers which are: • relevant to important current research in development policy, theory and analysis • make a novel and significant contribution to the field • provide critical tests, based on empirical work, of alternative theories, perspectives or schools of thought We invite articles that are interdisciplinary or focused on particular disciplines (e.g. economics, politics, geography, sociology or anthropology), with an expectation that all work is accessible to readers across the social sciences. The editors also welcome surveys of the literature in important fields of development policy. All research articles in this journal undergo rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous peer review. Given the high level of submissions, a majority of submissions are rejected quickly with reasons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信