{"title":"什么时候基金不是基金?探索升级的财政支持","authors":"Graeme Atherton, Marc Le Chevallier","doi":"10.1080/21582041.2023.2269144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper will examine the different funding streams associated with the levelling up agenda pursued by the Conservative government elected in the United Kingdom in 2019. It will explore in detail a number of funding streams that this government has associated with levelling up to understand their relationship to the levelling up agenda. The article will also analyse the relationship between the levelling up missions and the funding associated with levelling up. The Levelling Up White Paper released in February 2022 included 12 missions that were intended to provide a ‘targeted, measurable and time-bound objective, or set of objectives, from which a programme of change can then be constructed or catalysed’. The analysis of the funding streams outlined in this paper shows that the relationship with the missions is overall a tangential one. The lack of clarity on what is and is not a levelling up fund, coupled with the loose relationship with the levelling up missions may diminish the impact that the levelling up agenda will have on regional inequality in the UK.KEYWORDS: Levelling uppublic fundingregional inequalitypolicydevolution Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 It has been reported that the UKSPF might not fully cover, however, European Structural Funds (Brien, Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGraeme AthertonProfessor Graeme Atherton is head of the Centre for Inequality and Levelling Up. Graeme studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Trinity College Oxford and has been working in the field of education research and management since 1995. After 6 years leading Aimhigher work in London, he founded AccessHE and NEON in the UK. He now leads both the Centre for Levelling Up at the University of West London and NEON. Graeme holds Visiting Professorships at Amity University, London and Sunway University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He is a member of the board of the National Union of Students (NUS) and has produced over 200 conference papers, and publications.Marc Le ChevallierMarc Le Chevallier is a research and policy officer at the Centre for Inequality and Levelling Up. Prior to joining CEILUP, Marc completed an undergraduate degree in History and Politics at the University of Exeter and an MSc in Political Theory at the LSE. Previously, he has interned at the Thomas More Institute, finding local ways to regenerate small towns and villages of the ‘France peripherique’. He also worked at the Local Trust, focusing on a campaign to create a new independent endowment – the Community Wealth Fund – to support the most left behind neighbourhoods in England.","PeriodicalId":46484,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Social Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When is a fund not a fund? Exploring the financial support for levelling up\",\"authors\":\"Graeme Atherton, Marc Le Chevallier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21582041.2023.2269144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis paper will examine the different funding streams associated with the levelling up agenda pursued by the Conservative government elected in the United Kingdom in 2019. It will explore in detail a number of funding streams that this government has associated with levelling up to understand their relationship to the levelling up agenda. The article will also analyse the relationship between the levelling up missions and the funding associated with levelling up. The Levelling Up White Paper released in February 2022 included 12 missions that were intended to provide a ‘targeted, measurable and time-bound objective, or set of objectives, from which a programme of change can then be constructed or catalysed’. The analysis of the funding streams outlined in this paper shows that the relationship with the missions is overall a tangential one. The lack of clarity on what is and is not a levelling up fund, coupled with the loose relationship with the levelling up missions may diminish the impact that the levelling up agenda will have on regional inequality in the UK.KEYWORDS: Levelling uppublic fundingregional inequalitypolicydevolution Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 It has been reported that the UKSPF might not fully cover, however, European Structural Funds (Brien, Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGraeme AthertonProfessor Graeme Atherton is head of the Centre for Inequality and Levelling Up. Graeme studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Trinity College Oxford and has been working in the field of education research and management since 1995. After 6 years leading Aimhigher work in London, he founded AccessHE and NEON in the UK. He now leads both the Centre for Levelling Up at the University of West London and NEON. Graeme holds Visiting Professorships at Amity University, London and Sunway University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He is a member of the board of the National Union of Students (NUS) and has produced over 200 conference papers, and publications.Marc Le ChevallierMarc Le Chevallier is a research and policy officer at the Centre for Inequality and Levelling Up. Prior to joining CEILUP, Marc completed an undergraduate degree in History and Politics at the University of Exeter and an MSc in Political Theory at the LSE. Previously, he has interned at the Thomas More Institute, finding local ways to regenerate small towns and villages of the ‘France peripherique’. He also worked at the Local Trust, focusing on a campaign to create a new independent endowment – the Community Wealth Fund – to support the most left behind neighbourhoods in England.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Social Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2023.2269144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2023.2269144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文将研究与2019年当选的英国保守党政府所追求的升级议程相关的不同资金流。它将详细探讨本届政府与升级相关的一些资金流,以了解它们与升级议程的关系。本文还将分析升级任务与与升级有关的资金之间的关系。2022年2月发布的《升级白皮书》包括12项任务,旨在提供“有针对性的、可衡量的、有时限的目标,或一组目标,然后可以据此构建或催化变革计划”。本文概述的对资金流的分析表明,总的来说,与特派团的关系是切线关系。什么是升级基金,什么不是升级基金,缺乏明确性,再加上与升级任务的松散关系,可能会削弱升级议程对英国地区不平等的影响。关键词:平衡公共资金;地区不平等;政策权力下放披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1据报道,UKSPF可能不会完全覆盖欧洲结构基金(Brien, Citation2022)。作者简介Graeme Atherton教授是不平等和提升中心的负责人。格雷姆曾在牛津大学三一学院学习哲学、政治和经济学,自1995年以来一直从事教育研究和管理领域的工作。在伦敦领导Aimhigher工作6年后,他在英国创立了AccessHE和NEON。他现在领导着西伦敦大学的升级中心和NEON。Graeme在伦敦和睦大学和马来西亚吉隆坡双威大学担任客座教授。他是全国学生联合会(NUS)的董事会成员,发表了200多篇会议论文和出版物。Marc Le Chevallier是不平等与提升中心的研究和政策官员。在加入CEILUP之前,Marc在埃克塞特大学(University of Exeter)获得历史学和政治学学士学位,并在伦敦政治经济学院(LSE)获得政治理论硕士学位。此前,他曾在托马斯莫尔研究所实习,寻找当地的方法来重建“法国周边”的小城镇和村庄。他还在地方信托基金工作,致力于创建一个新的独立捐赠基金——社区财富基金——以支持英格兰最落后的社区。
When is a fund not a fund? Exploring the financial support for levelling up
ABSTRACTThis paper will examine the different funding streams associated with the levelling up agenda pursued by the Conservative government elected in the United Kingdom in 2019. It will explore in detail a number of funding streams that this government has associated with levelling up to understand their relationship to the levelling up agenda. The article will also analyse the relationship between the levelling up missions and the funding associated with levelling up. The Levelling Up White Paper released in February 2022 included 12 missions that were intended to provide a ‘targeted, measurable and time-bound objective, or set of objectives, from which a programme of change can then be constructed or catalysed’. The analysis of the funding streams outlined in this paper shows that the relationship with the missions is overall a tangential one. The lack of clarity on what is and is not a levelling up fund, coupled with the loose relationship with the levelling up missions may diminish the impact that the levelling up agenda will have on regional inequality in the UK.KEYWORDS: Levelling uppublic fundingregional inequalitypolicydevolution Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 It has been reported that the UKSPF might not fully cover, however, European Structural Funds (Brien, Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGraeme AthertonProfessor Graeme Atherton is head of the Centre for Inequality and Levelling Up. Graeme studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Trinity College Oxford and has been working in the field of education research and management since 1995. After 6 years leading Aimhigher work in London, he founded AccessHE and NEON in the UK. He now leads both the Centre for Levelling Up at the University of West London and NEON. Graeme holds Visiting Professorships at Amity University, London and Sunway University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He is a member of the board of the National Union of Students (NUS) and has produced over 200 conference papers, and publications.Marc Le ChevallierMarc Le Chevallier is a research and policy officer at the Centre for Inequality and Levelling Up. Prior to joining CEILUP, Marc completed an undergraduate degree in History and Politics at the University of Exeter and an MSc in Political Theory at the LSE. Previously, he has interned at the Thomas More Institute, finding local ways to regenerate small towns and villages of the ‘France peripherique’. He also worked at the Local Trust, focusing on a campaign to create a new independent endowment – the Community Wealth Fund – to support the most left behind neighbourhoods in England.