{"title":"Hauptpersonalrat der lehrelinen:第88条GDPR和欧盟和成员国雇员数据保护规则之间的相互作用","authors":"Halefom H. Abraha","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 30 March 2023, the European Court of Justice ruled for the first time on the interpretation of Article 88 GDPR, which gives Member States the power to provide for more specific rules on employee data processing. In response to a request from the Administrative Court of Wiesbaden ( Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen ) concerning the live streaming of video classes, the CJEU found the German law regulating personal data processing in the employment context to be incompatible with the GDPR. This note examines the far‐reaching implications of the ruling, not least given that similar provisions have been enacted at the state and federal levels in Germany as well as in several other Member States. It further identifies guidelines for the appropriate use of Article 88. Notably, national laws making use of Article 88 GDPR must provide normative content that is distinct from, but compatible with, the GDPR.","PeriodicalId":47530,"journal":{"name":"Modern Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen</i>: Article 88 GDPR and the Interplay between EU and Member State Employee Data Protection Rules\",\"authors\":\"Halefom H. Abraha\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-2230.12849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 30 March 2023, the European Court of Justice ruled for the first time on the interpretation of Article 88 GDPR, which gives Member States the power to provide for more specific rules on employee data processing. In response to a request from the Administrative Court of Wiesbaden ( Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen ) concerning the live streaming of video classes, the CJEU found the German law regulating personal data processing in the employment context to be incompatible with the GDPR. This note examines the far‐reaching implications of the ruling, not least given that similar provisions have been enacted at the state and federal levels in Germany as well as in several other Member States. It further identifies guidelines for the appropriate use of Article 88. Notably, national laws making use of Article 88 GDPR must provide normative content that is distinct from, but compatible with, the GDPR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Modern Law Review\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Modern Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12849\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2023年3月30日,欧洲法院首次就GDPR第88条的解释作出裁决,该条款赋予成员国在雇员数据处理方面提供更具体规则的权力。在回应威斯巴登行政法院(Hauptpersonalrat der lehrelinnen)关于视频课程直播的请求时,欧洲法院认为,德国关于就业背景下个人数据处理的法律与GDPR不相容。本文考察了该裁决的深远影响,尤其是考虑到德国以及其他几个成员国在州和联邦一级颁布了类似的规定。它进一步确定了适当使用第88条的准则。值得注意的是,利用GDPR第88条的国家法律必须提供与GDPR不同但兼容的规范性内容。
Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen: Article 88 GDPR and the Interplay between EU and Member State Employee Data Protection Rules
On 30 March 2023, the European Court of Justice ruled for the first time on the interpretation of Article 88 GDPR, which gives Member States the power to provide for more specific rules on employee data processing. In response to a request from the Administrative Court of Wiesbaden ( Hauptpersonalrat der Lehrerinnen ) concerning the live streaming of video classes, the CJEU found the German law regulating personal data processing in the employment context to be incompatible with the GDPR. This note examines the far‐reaching implications of the ruling, not least given that similar provisions have been enacted at the state and federal levels in Germany as well as in several other Member States. It further identifies guidelines for the appropriate use of Article 88. Notably, national laws making use of Article 88 GDPR must provide normative content that is distinct from, but compatible with, the GDPR.