{"title":"马来西亚社区眼科健康检查报告:城乡转诊比较","authors":"Saiful Azlan Rosli, Ai-Hong Chen","doi":"10.17576/ebangi.2023.2004.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared urban and rural referrals from a community-based eye health screening program named 'Jom Check Mata Malaysia (JCMM)'. The program was carried out in nine different states in Peninsular Malaysia—a total of 18 screening locations with a mix of urban and rural. Two mobile eye clinics were mobilised for community-based eye health screenings. This study involved 3,139 participants (1,158 and 1,981 participants from rural and urban, respectively). Visual complaints were collected via interviews using an ocular symptom checklist. The visual acuity was screened using a Snellen Chart. Ocular health screening, including anterior and posterior eye segments, was screened using slit-lamp bio-microscopy and fundus camera. Overall referrals were 2,139 (68%), 846 (27%) and 362 (12%) based on visual complaints, visual acuity and ocular health screening, respectively. Rural locations had significantly higher referral rates for visual complaint screening (χ2 = 422.53, p<0.05), visual acuity screening (χ2 = 20.20, p<0.05) as well as ocular health screening (χ2 = 64.70, p<0.05) compared to the urban locations. There was a consistent pattern of higher rural referrals for all types of vision screening. Information from our three-category screening analysis could help to design a vision screening for our rural and urban populations.","PeriodicalId":492362,"journal":{"name":"e-Bangi Journal of social science and humanities","volume":"139 S259","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMMUNITY-BASED EYE HEALTH SCREENING REPORT IN MALAYSIA: URBAN-RURAL REFERRAL COMPARISON\",\"authors\":\"Saiful Azlan Rosli, Ai-Hong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/ebangi.2023.2004.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared urban and rural referrals from a community-based eye health screening program named 'Jom Check Mata Malaysia (JCMM)'. The program was carried out in nine different states in Peninsular Malaysia—a total of 18 screening locations with a mix of urban and rural. Two mobile eye clinics were mobilised for community-based eye health screenings. This study involved 3,139 participants (1,158 and 1,981 participants from rural and urban, respectively). Visual complaints were collected via interviews using an ocular symptom checklist. The visual acuity was screened using a Snellen Chart. Ocular health screening, including anterior and posterior eye segments, was screened using slit-lamp bio-microscopy and fundus camera. Overall referrals were 2,139 (68%), 846 (27%) and 362 (12%) based on visual complaints, visual acuity and ocular health screening, respectively. Rural locations had significantly higher referral rates for visual complaint screening (χ2 = 422.53, p<0.05), visual acuity screening (χ2 = 20.20, p<0.05) as well as ocular health screening (χ2 = 64.70, p<0.05) compared to the urban locations. There was a consistent pattern of higher rural referrals for all types of vision screening. Information from our three-category screening analysis could help to design a vision screening for our rural and urban populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":492362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"e-Bangi Journal of social science and humanities\",\"volume\":\"139 S259\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"e-Bangi Journal of social science and humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2004.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Bangi Journal of social science and humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2004.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究比较了来自社区眼科健康筛查项目“Jom Check Mata Malaysia (JCMM)”的城市和农村转诊患者。该项目在马来西亚半岛的9个州开展,总共有18个筛查点,包括城市和农村。调动了两个流动眼科诊所进行社区眼科健康检查。这项研究涉及3139名参与者(分别来自农村和城市的1158名和1981名参与者)。使用眼部症状检查表通过访谈收集视力问题。使用Snellen表对视力进行筛查。使用裂隙灯生物显微镜和眼底相机进行眼健康筛查,包括前、后眼段。总体转诊分别为2139例(68%)、846例(27%)和362例(12%),分别基于视力疾患、视力和眼部健康筛查。农村地区视力疾患筛查(χ2 = 422.53, p<0.05)、视力筛查(χ2 = 20.20, p<0.05)和眼健康筛查(χ2 = 64.70, p<0.05)的转诊率显著高于城市地区。所有类型的视力筛查都有较高的农村转诊率。从我们的三类筛查分析中获得的信息可以帮助我们为农村和城市人口设计视力筛查。
COMMUNITY-BASED EYE HEALTH SCREENING REPORT IN MALAYSIA: URBAN-RURAL REFERRAL COMPARISON
This study compared urban and rural referrals from a community-based eye health screening program named 'Jom Check Mata Malaysia (JCMM)'. The program was carried out in nine different states in Peninsular Malaysia—a total of 18 screening locations with a mix of urban and rural. Two mobile eye clinics were mobilised for community-based eye health screenings. This study involved 3,139 participants (1,158 and 1,981 participants from rural and urban, respectively). Visual complaints were collected via interviews using an ocular symptom checklist. The visual acuity was screened using a Snellen Chart. Ocular health screening, including anterior and posterior eye segments, was screened using slit-lamp bio-microscopy and fundus camera. Overall referrals were 2,139 (68%), 846 (27%) and 362 (12%) based on visual complaints, visual acuity and ocular health screening, respectively. Rural locations had significantly higher referral rates for visual complaint screening (χ2 = 422.53, p<0.05), visual acuity screening (χ2 = 20.20, p<0.05) as well as ocular health screening (χ2 = 64.70, p<0.05) compared to the urban locations. There was a consistent pattern of higher rural referrals for all types of vision screening. Information from our three-category screening analysis could help to design a vision screening for our rural and urban populations.