Gabriela Azevedo, Ludmila Franca-Lipke, James Martel
{"title":"本雅明仍然有意义:本雅明“暴力批判”的百年现实论坛,引言-为什么我们比以往任何时候都更需要本雅明","authors":"Gabriela Azevedo, Ludmila Franca-Lipke, James Martel","doi":"10.1590/s0102-8529.20234501e20200093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Walter Benjamin published his influential essay ‘Critique of Violence’/‘Zur Kritik der Gewalt’ in 1921, and the work has troubled and provoked thinkers across disciplines for over a century now. This Forum gathers a group of scholars in philosophy, political science, international relations and legal studies to reflect on the actuality of Benjamin’s essay for contemporary critical theory. In this opening to the Forum, the guest editors Gabriela Azevedo and Ludmila Franca-Lipke introduce the Forum as a whole. Then in the following piece, James Martel argues that Benjamin helps us to better understand our current moment than almost any other thinker. Benjamin explains the nature of authoritarianism, the link between liberalism (and neoliberalism) and fascism and how such forces can be resisted. In his essay, Martel updates the concept of mythic violence to take into account the resilience of the liberal/fascist connection (even as it appears to be a node of struggle and mutual incompatibility). He shows that ‘Critique of Violence’ doesn’t just diagnose our time but it also shows a way out of the abyss that we are in. Martel lists seven key points from Benjamin’s essay and adds one other point from José Carlos Mariátegui to think concretely about how to apply their lessons from 100 years ago to our own time.","PeriodicalId":30003,"journal":{"name":"Contexto Internacional","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benjamin Still Makes Sense: Forum on the Actuality of Benjamin’s ‘Critique of Violence’ at Its Centenary, Introduction - Why We Need Benjamin More than Ever\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Azevedo, Ludmila Franca-Lipke, James Martel\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0102-8529.20234501e20200093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Walter Benjamin published his influential essay ‘Critique of Violence’/‘Zur Kritik der Gewalt’ in 1921, and the work has troubled and provoked thinkers across disciplines for over a century now. This Forum gathers a group of scholars in philosophy, political science, international relations and legal studies to reflect on the actuality of Benjamin’s essay for contemporary critical theory. In this opening to the Forum, the guest editors Gabriela Azevedo and Ludmila Franca-Lipke introduce the Forum as a whole. Then in the following piece, James Martel argues that Benjamin helps us to better understand our current moment than almost any other thinker. Benjamin explains the nature of authoritarianism, the link between liberalism (and neoliberalism) and fascism and how such forces can be resisted. In his essay, Martel updates the concept of mythic violence to take into account the resilience of the liberal/fascist connection (even as it appears to be a node of struggle and mutual incompatibility). He shows that ‘Critique of Violence’ doesn’t just diagnose our time but it also shows a way out of the abyss that we are in. Martel lists seven key points from Benjamin’s essay and adds one other point from José Carlos Mariátegui to think concretely about how to apply their lessons from 100 years ago to our own time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contexto Internacional\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contexto Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.20234501e20200093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contexto Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.20234501e20200093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
沃尔特·本雅明(Walter Benjamin)在1921年发表了他颇具影响力的论文《暴力批判》(Zur Kritik der Gewalt),一个多世纪以来,这部作品一直困扰和激发着各个学科的思想家。本次论坛聚集了一群来自哲学、政治学、国际关系和法律研究领域的学者,对本雅明的当代批判理论的现状进行反思。在论坛开幕式上,特邀编辑Gabriela Azevedo和Ludmila Franca-Lipke介绍了论坛的整体情况。在接下来的文章中,詹姆斯·马特尔认为,本杰明比其他任何思想家都能更好地帮助我们理解当下。本雅明解释了威权主义的本质,自由主义(和新自由主义)与法西斯主义之间的联系,以及如何抵制这种力量。在他的文章中,马特尔更新了神话暴力的概念,以考虑到自由主义/法西斯主义联系的弹性(即使它似乎是斗争和相互不相容的节点)。他指出,《暴力批判》不仅诊断了我们的时代,还指出了一条走出我们所处深渊的道路。马特尔从本杰明的文章中列出了七个关键点,并从约瑟·卡洛斯Mariátegui中补充了另一个观点,以具体思考如何将他们100年前的经验教训应用到我们自己的时代。
Benjamin Still Makes Sense: Forum on the Actuality of Benjamin’s ‘Critique of Violence’ at Its Centenary, Introduction - Why We Need Benjamin More than Ever
Abstract Walter Benjamin published his influential essay ‘Critique of Violence’/‘Zur Kritik der Gewalt’ in 1921, and the work has troubled and provoked thinkers across disciplines for over a century now. This Forum gathers a group of scholars in philosophy, political science, international relations and legal studies to reflect on the actuality of Benjamin’s essay for contemporary critical theory. In this opening to the Forum, the guest editors Gabriela Azevedo and Ludmila Franca-Lipke introduce the Forum as a whole. Then in the following piece, James Martel argues that Benjamin helps us to better understand our current moment than almost any other thinker. Benjamin explains the nature of authoritarianism, the link between liberalism (and neoliberalism) and fascism and how such forces can be resisted. In his essay, Martel updates the concept of mythic violence to take into account the resilience of the liberal/fascist connection (even as it appears to be a node of struggle and mutual incompatibility). He shows that ‘Critique of Violence’ doesn’t just diagnose our time but it also shows a way out of the abyss that we are in. Martel lists seven key points from Benjamin’s essay and adds one other point from José Carlos Mariátegui to think concretely about how to apply their lessons from 100 years ago to our own time.