文化多元化重要吗?参与会计教材编制的专家意见

Irsyadillah Irsyadillah, Raihani Raihani, Zulfadhli Zulfadhli, Alhashmi Aboubaker Lasyoud
{"title":"文化多元化重要吗?参与会计教材编制的专家意见","authors":"Irsyadillah Irsyadillah, Raihani Raihani, Zulfadhli Zulfadhli, Alhashmi Aboubaker Lasyoud","doi":"10.24815/jaroe.v6i1.32700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective –The paper seeks to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of individuals involved in the production of accounting textbooks about providing cultural pluralism in the textbooks.Methodology –This paper used semi-structured interviews with key actors of accounting textbook production, including translators, independent reviewers, adaptors, authors and commissioning editors. With one exception, all interviewees are also academics at universities. Results –The paper finds that accounting textbooks are cultural and political artifacts that reflect the the cultural, political, and ideological viewpoints of the powerful groups in the world. In other words, the textbook contents are the results of power domination. They have used accounting textbooks as powerful educational media to homogenise cultural and ethical values of accounting and accounting education to be solely based on Anglo-American capitalism. This has greatly affected the professionals involved in the textbook production. Therefore, it is not an urgent matter for them to incorporate diversity of perspectives into accounting textbooks used in Indonesia.Novelty/Originality –Although accounting research has explored the issues of accounting textbooks, such as the readability, price, selection, and use, studies that consider the political and cultural role of accounting textbooks especially from the perspective of individual involved in the textbook production are still scant. In particular, there is no research in Indonesia that presents the views of people who produce accounting textbooks regarding the content of their textbooks.","PeriodicalId":474398,"journal":{"name":"Journal of accounting research, organization and economics","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Cultural Pluralism Matter? Views from Experts Involved in the Production of Accounting Textbooks\",\"authors\":\"Irsyadillah Irsyadillah, Raihani Raihani, Zulfadhli Zulfadhli, Alhashmi Aboubaker Lasyoud\",\"doi\":\"10.24815/jaroe.v6i1.32700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective –The paper seeks to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of individuals involved in the production of accounting textbooks about providing cultural pluralism in the textbooks.Methodology –This paper used semi-structured interviews with key actors of accounting textbook production, including translators, independent reviewers, adaptors, authors and commissioning editors. With one exception, all interviewees are also academics at universities. Results –The paper finds that accounting textbooks are cultural and political artifacts that reflect the the cultural, political, and ideological viewpoints of the powerful groups in the world. In other words, the textbook contents are the results of power domination. They have used accounting textbooks as powerful educational media to homogenise cultural and ethical values of accounting and accounting education to be solely based on Anglo-American capitalism. This has greatly affected the professionals involved in the textbook production. Therefore, it is not an urgent matter for them to incorporate diversity of perspectives into accounting textbooks used in Indonesia.Novelty/Originality –Although accounting research has explored the issues of accounting textbooks, such as the readability, price, selection, and use, studies that consider the political and cultural role of accounting textbooks especially from the perspective of individual involved in the textbook production are still scant. In particular, there is no research in Indonesia that presents the views of people who produce accounting textbooks regarding the content of their textbooks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of accounting research, organization and economics\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of accounting research, organization and economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v6i1.32700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of accounting research, organization and economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v6i1.32700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的-本文旨在评估参与会计教科书制作的个人对教科书中提供文化多元化的看法和态度。方法-本文采用半结构化访谈,采访了会计教材制作的主要参与者,包括译者、独立审稿人、改编者、作者和委托编辑。除了一个例外,所有受访者都是大学的学者。结果——本文发现会计教科书是文化和政治的产物,反映了世界上强大群体的文化、政治和意识形态观点。也就是说,教科书内容是权力支配的结果。他们利用会计教科书作为强大的教育媒介,将会计的文化和伦理价值同质化,使会计教育完全以英美资本主义为基础。这极大地影响了参与教材制作的专业人员。因此,对他们来说,将视角的多样性纳入印度尼西亚使用的会计教科书并不是一件紧迫的事情。新颖性/原创性-尽管会计研究已经探讨了会计教科书的可读性、价格、选择和使用等问题,但考虑会计教科书的政治和文化作用的研究,特别是从参与教科书生产的个人的角度来看,仍然很少。特别是,在印度尼西亚,没有研究表明会计教科书编写者对教科书内容的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Cultural Pluralism Matter? Views from Experts Involved in the Production of Accounting Textbooks
Objective –The paper seeks to evaluate the perceptions and attitudes of individuals involved in the production of accounting textbooks about providing cultural pluralism in the textbooks.Methodology –This paper used semi-structured interviews with key actors of accounting textbook production, including translators, independent reviewers, adaptors, authors and commissioning editors. With one exception, all interviewees are also academics at universities. Results –The paper finds that accounting textbooks are cultural and political artifacts that reflect the the cultural, political, and ideological viewpoints of the powerful groups in the world. In other words, the textbook contents are the results of power domination. They have used accounting textbooks as powerful educational media to homogenise cultural and ethical values of accounting and accounting education to be solely based on Anglo-American capitalism. This has greatly affected the professionals involved in the textbook production. Therefore, it is not an urgent matter for them to incorporate diversity of perspectives into accounting textbooks used in Indonesia.Novelty/Originality –Although accounting research has explored the issues of accounting textbooks, such as the readability, price, selection, and use, studies that consider the political and cultural role of accounting textbooks especially from the perspective of individual involved in the textbook production are still scant. In particular, there is no research in Indonesia that presents the views of people who produce accounting textbooks regarding the content of their textbooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信