Matthew M. Kalscheur MD, FHRS , Matthew R. Martini MD , Marcus Mahnke BS , Fauzia Osman MPH , Daniel S. Modaff MD , Blake E. Fleeman MD , Ryan T. Kipp MD, FHRS , Jennifer M. Wright MD, FHRS , Joshua E. Medow MD, PhD
{"title":"评估基于规则的自适应剂量算法,以在心房颤动消融过程中维持治疗性抗凝血功能","authors":"Matthew M. Kalscheur MD, FHRS , Matthew R. Martini MD , Marcus Mahnke BS , Fauzia Osman MPH , Daniel S. Modaff MD , Blake E. Fleeman MD , Ryan T. Kipp MD, FHRS , Jennifer M. Wright MD, FHRS , Joshua E. Medow MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagulation outcomes during AF ablation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Digital Intern dosing algorithm is an adaptive, rule-based CDSS for heparin dosing. The initial dose is calculated from the patient’s weight, baseline activated clotting time (ACT), and outpatient anticoagulant. Subsequent recommendations adapt based on individual patient ACT changes. Outcomes from 50 cases prior to algorithm introduction were compared to 139 cases using the algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Procedures using the dosing algorithm reached goal ACT (over 300 seconds) faster (17.6 ± 11.1 minutes vs 33.3 ± 23.6 minutes pre-algorithm, <em>P</em> < .001). ACTs fell below goal while in the LA (odds ratio 0.20 [0.10–0.39], <em>P</em> < .001) and rose above 400 seconds less frequently (odds ratio 0.21 [0.07–0.59], <em>P</em> = .003). System Usability Scale scores were excellent (96 ± 5, n = 7, score >80.3 excellent). Preprocedure anticoagulant, weight, baseline ACT, age, sex, and renal function were potential predictors of heparin dose to achieve ACT >300 seconds and final infusion rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A heparin dosing CDSS based on rules and adaptation to individual patient response improved maintenance of therapeutic ACT during AF ablation and was rated highly by nurses for usability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 6","pages":"Pages 173-182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000749/pdfft?md5=8aa219005b5980da0d4d8a24b2a7977f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693623000749-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation\",\"authors\":\"Matthew M. Kalscheur MD, FHRS , Matthew R. Martini MD , Marcus Mahnke BS , Fauzia Osman MPH , Daniel S. Modaff MD , Blake E. Fleeman MD , Ryan T. Kipp MD, FHRS , Jennifer M. Wright MD, FHRS , Joshua E. Medow MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagulation outcomes during AF ablation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Digital Intern dosing algorithm is an adaptive, rule-based CDSS for heparin dosing. The initial dose is calculated from the patient’s weight, baseline activated clotting time (ACT), and outpatient anticoagulant. Subsequent recommendations adapt based on individual patient ACT changes. Outcomes from 50 cases prior to algorithm introduction were compared to 139 cases using the algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Procedures using the dosing algorithm reached goal ACT (over 300 seconds) faster (17.6 ± 11.1 minutes vs 33.3 ± 23.6 minutes pre-algorithm, <em>P</em> < .001). ACTs fell below goal while in the LA (odds ratio 0.20 [0.10–0.39], <em>P</em> < .001) and rose above 400 seconds less frequently (odds ratio 0.21 [0.07–0.59], <em>P</em> = .003). System Usability Scale scores were excellent (96 ± 5, n = 7, score >80.3 excellent). Preprocedure anticoagulant, weight, baseline ACT, age, sex, and renal function were potential predictors of heparin dose to achieve ACT >300 seconds and final infusion rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A heparin dosing CDSS based on rules and adaptation to individual patient response improved maintenance of therapeutic ACT during AF ablation and was rated highly by nurses for usability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 173-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000749/pdfft?md5=8aa219005b5980da0d4d8a24b2a7977f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693623000749-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation
Background
Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.
Objective
To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagulation outcomes during AF ablation.
Methods
The Digital Intern dosing algorithm is an adaptive, rule-based CDSS for heparin dosing. The initial dose is calculated from the patient’s weight, baseline activated clotting time (ACT), and outpatient anticoagulant. Subsequent recommendations adapt based on individual patient ACT changes. Outcomes from 50 cases prior to algorithm introduction were compared to 139 cases using the algorithm.
Results
Procedures using the dosing algorithm reached goal ACT (over 300 seconds) faster (17.6 ± 11.1 minutes vs 33.3 ± 23.6 minutes pre-algorithm, P < .001). ACTs fell below goal while in the LA (odds ratio 0.20 [0.10–0.39], P < .001) and rose above 400 seconds less frequently (odds ratio 0.21 [0.07–0.59], P = .003). System Usability Scale scores were excellent (96 ± 5, n = 7, score >80.3 excellent). Preprocedure anticoagulant, weight, baseline ACT, age, sex, and renal function were potential predictors of heparin dose to achieve ACT >300 seconds and final infusion rate.
Conclusion
A heparin dosing CDSS based on rules and adaptation to individual patient response improved maintenance of therapeutic ACT during AF ablation and was rated highly by nurses for usability.