发起人所有权是否影响股利政策?代理问题视角

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Geeta Singh, Satish Kumar, Rajesh Pathak, Kaushik Bhattacharjee
{"title":"发起人所有权是否影响股利政策?代理问题视角","authors":"Geeta Singh, Satish Kumar, Rajesh Pathak, Kaushik Bhattacharjee","doi":"10.37625/abr.26.2.288-313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we show a nonlinear relation between promoter ownership and dividends in the Indian context, that is, promoters pay more dividends at lower level of their ownership while they pay lesser dividends when their ownership increases beyond a threshold. In particular, we find that the adverse impact of promoter ownership on dividends is greater only at higher level of ownership, where promoters become entrenched with their effective control, and outsiders face the greatest risk of expropriation. We contend that agency and information asymmetry problems are the factors driving our results. We establish this by showing that the nonlinear relation between promoter ownership and dividend payment is more pronounced for standalone firms than group affiliated firms, for firms with more free cash flows and for firms with smaller board and less number of independent directors in the board. Our results are robust to endogeneity concerns and testing the dividend payment decision (to pay or not to pay) using the binary choice logit model.","PeriodicalId":34785,"journal":{"name":"American Business Review","volume":"107 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Promoter Ownership Affect Dividend Policy? An Agency Problem Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Geeta Singh, Satish Kumar, Rajesh Pathak, Kaushik Bhattacharjee\",\"doi\":\"10.37625/abr.26.2.288-313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we show a nonlinear relation between promoter ownership and dividends in the Indian context, that is, promoters pay more dividends at lower level of their ownership while they pay lesser dividends when their ownership increases beyond a threshold. In particular, we find that the adverse impact of promoter ownership on dividends is greater only at higher level of ownership, where promoters become entrenched with their effective control, and outsiders face the greatest risk of expropriation. We contend that agency and information asymmetry problems are the factors driving our results. We establish this by showing that the nonlinear relation between promoter ownership and dividend payment is more pronounced for standalone firms than group affiliated firms, for firms with more free cash flows and for firms with smaller board and less number of independent directors in the board. Our results are robust to endogeneity concerns and testing the dividend payment decision (to pay or not to pay) using the binary choice logit model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Business Review\",\"volume\":\"107 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.26.2.288-313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.26.2.288-313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们展示了在印度背景下发起人所有权与股息之间的非线性关系,即发起人在其所有权水平较低时支付更多的股息,而当其所有权超过阈值时支付较少的股息。特别是,我们发现发起人所有权对股息的不利影响只有在更高的所有权水平下才会更大,在这种情况下,发起人的有效控制变得根深蒂固,而局外人面临的被征用风险最大。我们认为代理和信息不对称问题是驱动我们结果的因素。我们通过证明发起人所有权和股息支付之间的非线性关系对于独立公司比集团关联公司,对于拥有更多自由现金流的公司以及董事会规模较小且董事会中独立董事数量较少的公司来说更为明显来证明这一点。我们的结果对内生性问题和使用二元选择logit模型测试股息支付决策(支付或不支付)具有鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Promoter Ownership Affect Dividend Policy? An Agency Problem Perspective
In this paper, we show a nonlinear relation between promoter ownership and dividends in the Indian context, that is, promoters pay more dividends at lower level of their ownership while they pay lesser dividends when their ownership increases beyond a threshold. In particular, we find that the adverse impact of promoter ownership on dividends is greater only at higher level of ownership, where promoters become entrenched with their effective control, and outsiders face the greatest risk of expropriation. We contend that agency and information asymmetry problems are the factors driving our results. We establish this by showing that the nonlinear relation between promoter ownership and dividend payment is more pronounced for standalone firms than group affiliated firms, for firms with more free cash flows and for firms with smaller board and less number of independent directors in the board. Our results are robust to endogeneity concerns and testing the dividend payment decision (to pay or not to pay) using the binary choice logit model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Business Review
American Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信