解决欧盟的跨境补贴问题:需要建立一个有希望的开端。第1部分

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Jochen Beck, Pieter Van Vaerenbergh, Laurent Ruessmann, Kristiyana Drandarova
{"title":"解决欧盟的跨境补贴问题:需要建立一个有希望的开端。第1部分","authors":"Jochen Beck, Pieter Van Vaerenbergh, Laurent Ruessmann, Kristiyana Drandarova","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2023047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In two recent rulings regarding anti-subsidy duties on imports from Egypt, the EU General Court confirmed that cross-border subsidies can be countervailed under the Basic Anti-Subsidy (AS) Regulation. According to the General Court, Belt and Road subsidies granted by China to subsidiaries of Chinese state-owned companies outside China can legitimately be attributed to the government of third countries through application of international law principles. This article looks at the General Court’s findings and the implications for further AS investigations against crossborder subsidies. Cross-border subsidies, General Court, Basic AS Regulation, Belt and Road Initiative, countervailing duties, SCM Agreement, ILC Articles","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tackling Cross-Border Subsidies in the EU: The Need to Build on a Promising Start Part 1\",\"authors\":\"Jochen Beck, Pieter Van Vaerenbergh, Laurent Ruessmann, Kristiyana Drandarova\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gtcj2023047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In two recent rulings regarding anti-subsidy duties on imports from Egypt, the EU General Court confirmed that cross-border subsidies can be countervailed under the Basic Anti-Subsidy (AS) Regulation. According to the General Court, Belt and Road subsidies granted by China to subsidiaries of Chinese state-owned companies outside China can legitimately be attributed to the government of third countries through application of international law principles. This article looks at the General Court’s findings and the implications for further AS investigations against crossborder subsidies. Cross-border subsidies, General Court, Basic AS Regulation, Belt and Road Initiative, countervailing duties, SCM Agreement, ILC Articles\",\"PeriodicalId\":12728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2023047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2023047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最近关于从埃及进口的反补贴税的两项裁决中,欧盟普通法院确认,根据《基本反补贴条例》,跨境补贴可以被反补贴。根据普通法院的说法,中国向中国国有企业在中国境外的子公司提供的“一带一路”补贴可以通过适用国际法原则合法地归因于第三国政府。本文着眼于普通法院的调查结果以及对进一步针对跨境补贴的AS调查的影响。跨境补贴、普通法院、AS基本规则、“一带一路”倡议、反补贴税、SCM协议、ILC条款
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tackling Cross-Border Subsidies in the EU: The Need to Build on a Promising Start Part 1
In two recent rulings regarding anti-subsidy duties on imports from Egypt, the EU General Court confirmed that cross-border subsidies can be countervailed under the Basic Anti-Subsidy (AS) Regulation. According to the General Court, Belt and Road subsidies granted by China to subsidiaries of Chinese state-owned companies outside China can legitimately be attributed to the government of third countries through application of international law principles. This article looks at the General Court’s findings and the implications for further AS investigations against crossborder subsidies. Cross-border subsidies, General Court, Basic AS Regulation, Belt and Road Initiative, countervailing duties, SCM Agreement, ILC Articles
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信