罢工(最低服务水平)法案:对劳动人民的极端攻击

K. D. Ewing, Lord John Hendy
{"title":"罢工(最低服务水平)法案:对劳动人民的极端攻击","authors":"K. D. Ewing, Lord John Hendy","doi":"10.3828/theory.2023.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we examine the strikes (minimum service levels) bill from five perspectives: its purpose, its form, its content, its compatibility with international law and its implications. From each viewpoint, the bill is shown to be an extreme and unjustifiable attack on working people. The bill is also viewed in the context of government attacks on economic and political freedoms more widely.","PeriodicalId":489738,"journal":{"name":"Theory & struggle","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The strikes (minimum service levels) bill: An extreme attack on working people\",\"authors\":\"K. D. Ewing, Lord John Hendy\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/theory.2023.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article we examine the strikes (minimum service levels) bill from five perspectives: its purpose, its form, its content, its compatibility with international law and its implications. From each viewpoint, the bill is shown to be an extreme and unjustifiable attack on working people. The bill is also viewed in the context of government attacks on economic and political freedoms more widely.\",\"PeriodicalId\":489738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory & struggle\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory & struggle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/theory.2023.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory & struggle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/theory.2023.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们从五个方面考察罢工(最低服务水平)法案:它的目的,它的形式,它的内容,它与国际法的兼容性和它的影响。无论从哪个角度来看,该法案都是对劳动人民的极端和无理攻击。该法案也被放在政府更广泛地攻击经济和政治自由的背景下看待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The strikes (minimum service levels) bill: An extreme attack on working people
In this article we examine the strikes (minimum service levels) bill from five perspectives: its purpose, its form, its content, its compatibility with international law and its implications. From each viewpoint, the bill is shown to be an extreme and unjustifiable attack on working people. The bill is also viewed in the context of government attacks on economic and political freedoms more widely.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信