专业知识能力、经验、审计师职业怀疑和审计状况与提供审计意见的相关性

Padlah RIYADI, Erllycha Novian NUR
{"title":"专业知识能力、经验、审计师职业怀疑和审计状况与提供审计意见的相关性","authors":"Padlah RIYADI, Erllycha Novian NUR","doi":"10.38142/jogta.v1i4.632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines and provides empirical evidence that the factor of expertise, experience, professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations has no effect or relevance to the provision of audit opinion on the entity's financial statements. This research was conducted using the sampling method, namely purposive sampling, with the type of quantitative research. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis models. Hypothesis testing is done to determine the extent of expertise, experience, and professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations that affect the relevance of audit opinion on the financial statements of entities either partially or simultaneously. Hypothesis testing is done to determine the extent of expertise, experience, and professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations that affect the relevance of audit opinion on the financial statements of entities either partially or simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":484281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Governance Taxation and Auditing","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competence Of Expertise, Experience, Auditor Professional Skepticism, And Audit Situation To The Relevance Of Providing Audit Opinion On an Entity's Financial Statements\",\"authors\":\"Padlah RIYADI, Erllycha Novian NUR\",\"doi\":\"10.38142/jogta.v1i4.632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research examines and provides empirical evidence that the factor of expertise, experience, professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations has no effect or relevance to the provision of audit opinion on the entity's financial statements. This research was conducted using the sampling method, namely purposive sampling, with the type of quantitative research. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis models. Hypothesis testing is done to determine the extent of expertise, experience, and professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations that affect the relevance of audit opinion on the financial statements of entities either partially or simultaneously. Hypothesis testing is done to determine the extent of expertise, experience, and professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations that affect the relevance of audit opinion on the financial statements of entities either partially or simultaneously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":484281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Governance Taxation and Auditing\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Governance Taxation and Auditing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v1i4.632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Governance Taxation and Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v1i4.632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究检验并提供了经验证据,证明审计人员的专业知识、经验、职业怀疑和审计情况等因素对提供对主体财务报表的审计意见没有影响或相关性。本研究采用抽样方法,即有目的抽样,采用定量研究的方式。采用多元回归分析模型对数据进行分析。假设检验是为了确定审计师的专业知识、经验和职业怀疑的程度,以及部分或同时影响审计意见对实体财务报表的相关性的审计情况。假设检验是为了确定审计师的专业知识、经验和职业怀疑的程度,以及部分或同时影响审计意见对实体财务报表的相关性的审计情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competence Of Expertise, Experience, Auditor Professional Skepticism, And Audit Situation To The Relevance Of Providing Audit Opinion On an Entity's Financial Statements
This research examines and provides empirical evidence that the factor of expertise, experience, professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations has no effect or relevance to the provision of audit opinion on the entity's financial statements. This research was conducted using the sampling method, namely purposive sampling, with the type of quantitative research. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis models. Hypothesis testing is done to determine the extent of expertise, experience, and professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations that affect the relevance of audit opinion on the financial statements of entities either partially or simultaneously. Hypothesis testing is done to determine the extent of expertise, experience, and professional skepticism of auditors and audit situations that affect the relevance of audit opinion on the financial statements of entities either partially or simultaneously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信