古典与现代训诂风格:古典与现代训诂风格的演变

Ahmad Zaenuri
{"title":"古典与现代训诂风格:古典与现代训诂风格的演变","authors":"Ahmad Zaenuri","doi":"10.32505/at-tibyan.v8i1.6007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to probe the discourse surrounding the debate between classical and modern interpretations of the Quran and the factors contributing to these interpretation styles' formation and evolution. The first interpretation is considered textualist and does not use much of an outside scientific approach inherited from Islam. In contrast, the modern interpretation is enunciated to depart from the traditional Islamic scholarly traditions and employ social science approaches. The research was conducted through a library research approach, analyzing classical tafsir manuscripts and modern academic research. The study extrapolated that the evolution of interpretation is shaped by the tendencies and interests of interpreters, impacted by their worldview and cultural history. As a result, the emerging interpretation styles enclose classical-literalist, theological, and modern-rationalist.","PeriodicalId":34522,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal AtTibyan Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CLASSICAL AND MODERN EXEGESIS STYLES: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT EXEGESIS STYLES FROM CLASSICAL AND MODERN PERIODS\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Zaenuri\",\"doi\":\"10.32505/at-tibyan.v8i1.6007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to probe the discourse surrounding the debate between classical and modern interpretations of the Quran and the factors contributing to these interpretation styles' formation and evolution. The first interpretation is considered textualist and does not use much of an outside scientific approach inherited from Islam. In contrast, the modern interpretation is enunciated to depart from the traditional Islamic scholarly traditions and employ social science approaches. The research was conducted through a library research approach, analyzing classical tafsir manuscripts and modern academic research. The study extrapolated that the evolution of interpretation is shaped by the tendencies and interests of interpreters, impacted by their worldview and cultural history. As a result, the emerging interpretation styles enclose classical-literalist, theological, and modern-rationalist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal AtTibyan Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal AtTibyan Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v8i1.6007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal AtTibyan Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v8i1.6007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨围绕古兰经古典诠释与现代诠释之争的论述,以及促成这些诠释风格形成与演变的因素。第一种解释被认为是文本主义的,并没有使用多少从伊斯兰教继承下来的外部科学方法。相比之下,现代的解释是明确地脱离传统的伊斯兰学术传统,并采用社会科学的方法。本研究采用图书馆研究的方法,分析古典文献和现代学术研究。研究推断,口译的演变是由口译者的倾向和兴趣决定的,受其世界观和文化历史的影响。因此,新兴的解释风格包括古典-字面主义,神学和现代-理性主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CLASSICAL AND MODERN EXEGESIS STYLES: THE EVOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT EXEGESIS STYLES FROM CLASSICAL AND MODERN PERIODS
This article aims to probe the discourse surrounding the debate between classical and modern interpretations of the Quran and the factors contributing to these interpretation styles' formation and evolution. The first interpretation is considered textualist and does not use much of an outside scientific approach inherited from Islam. In contrast, the modern interpretation is enunciated to depart from the traditional Islamic scholarly traditions and employ social science approaches. The research was conducted through a library research approach, analyzing classical tafsir manuscripts and modern academic research. The study extrapolated that the evolution of interpretation is shaped by the tendencies and interests of interpreters, impacted by their worldview and cultural history. As a result, the emerging interpretation styles enclose classical-literalist, theological, and modern-rationalist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信