热历史建模技术和解释策略:使用QTQt的应用

IF 1.7 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geosphere Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1130/ges02528.1
Alyssa L. Abbey, Mark Wildman, Andrea L. Stevens Goddard, Kendra E. Murray
{"title":"热历史建模技术和解释策略:使用QTQt的应用","authors":"Alyssa L. Abbey, Mark Wildman, Andrea L. Stevens Goddard, Kendra E. Murray","doi":"10.1130/ges02528.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Advances in low-temperature thermochronology have made it applicable to a plethora of geoscience investigations. The development of modeling programs (e.g., QTQt and HeFTy) that extract thermal histories from thermochronologic data has facilitated growth of this field. However, the increasingly wide range of scientists who apply these tools requires an accessible entry point to thermal history modeling and how these models develop our understanding of complex geological processes. This contribution offers a discussion of modeling strategies, using QTQt, including making decisions about model design, data input, kinetic parameters, and other factors that may influence the model output. We present a suite of synthetic data sets derived from known thermal histories with accompanying tutorial exercises in the Supplemental Material1. These data sets illustrate the opportunities and limitations of thermal history modeling. Examining these synthetic data helps to develop intuition about which thermochronometric data are most sensitive to different thermal events and to what extent user decisions on data handling and model setup can control the recovery of the true solution. We also use real data to demonstrate the importance of incorporating sensitivity testing into thermal history modeling and suggest several best practices for exploring model sensitivity to factors including, but not limited to, the model design or inversion algorithm, geologic constraints, data trends, the spatial relationship between samples, or the choice of kinetics model. Finally, we provide a detailed and explicit workflow and an applied example for a method of interrogating vague model results or low observation-prediction fits that we call the “Path Structure Approach.” Our explicit examination of thermal history modeling practices is designed to guide modelers to identify the factors controlling model results and demonstrate reproducible approaches for the interpretation of thermal histories.","PeriodicalId":55100,"journal":{"name":"Geosphere","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermal history modeling techniques and interpretation strategies: Applications using QTQt\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa L. Abbey, Mark Wildman, Andrea L. Stevens Goddard, Kendra E. Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1130/ges02528.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Advances in low-temperature thermochronology have made it applicable to a plethora of geoscience investigations. The development of modeling programs (e.g., QTQt and HeFTy) that extract thermal histories from thermochronologic data has facilitated growth of this field. However, the increasingly wide range of scientists who apply these tools requires an accessible entry point to thermal history modeling and how these models develop our understanding of complex geological processes. This contribution offers a discussion of modeling strategies, using QTQt, including making decisions about model design, data input, kinetic parameters, and other factors that may influence the model output. We present a suite of synthetic data sets derived from known thermal histories with accompanying tutorial exercises in the Supplemental Material1. These data sets illustrate the opportunities and limitations of thermal history modeling. Examining these synthetic data helps to develop intuition about which thermochronometric data are most sensitive to different thermal events and to what extent user decisions on data handling and model setup can control the recovery of the true solution. We also use real data to demonstrate the importance of incorporating sensitivity testing into thermal history modeling and suggest several best practices for exploring model sensitivity to factors including, but not limited to, the model design or inversion algorithm, geologic constraints, data trends, the spatial relationship between samples, or the choice of kinetics model. Finally, we provide a detailed and explicit workflow and an applied example for a method of interrogating vague model results or low observation-prediction fits that we call the “Path Structure Approach.” Our explicit examination of thermal history modeling practices is designed to guide modelers to identify the factors controlling model results and demonstrate reproducible approaches for the interpretation of thermal histories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosphere\",\"volume\":\"179 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02528.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/ges02528.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

低温热年代学的进步使其适用于大量的地球科学研究。从热年代学数据中提取热历史的建模程序(如QTQt和HeFTy)的发展促进了该领域的发展。然而,应用这些工具的越来越广泛的科学家需要一个可访问的热历史建模入口,以及这些模型如何发展我们对复杂地质过程的理解。该贡献提供了使用QTQt的建模策略的讨论,包括关于模型设计、数据输入、动力学参数和其他可能影响模型输出的因素的决策。我们在补充材料1中提供了一套合成数据集,这些数据集来源于已知的热历史,并附有教程练习。这些数据集说明了热历史建模的机会和局限性。检查这些合成数据有助于建立关于哪些热时计数据对不同热事件最敏感的直觉,以及用户在数据处理和模型设置方面的决策在多大程度上可以控制真实解决方案的恢复。我们还使用实际数据来证明将灵敏度测试纳入热历史建模的重要性,并提出了探索模型敏感性的几个最佳实践,这些因素包括但不限于模型设计或反演算法、地质约束、数据趋势、样本之间的空间关系或动力学模型的选择。最后,我们提供了一个详细而明确的工作流程和一个应用实例,用于询问模糊模型结果或低观测预测拟合的方法,我们称之为“路径结构方法”。我们对热历史建模实践的明确研究旨在指导建模者识别控制模型结果的因素,并展示热历史解释的可重复方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermal history modeling techniques and interpretation strategies: Applications using QTQt
Abstract Advances in low-temperature thermochronology have made it applicable to a plethora of geoscience investigations. The development of modeling programs (e.g., QTQt and HeFTy) that extract thermal histories from thermochronologic data has facilitated growth of this field. However, the increasingly wide range of scientists who apply these tools requires an accessible entry point to thermal history modeling and how these models develop our understanding of complex geological processes. This contribution offers a discussion of modeling strategies, using QTQt, including making decisions about model design, data input, kinetic parameters, and other factors that may influence the model output. We present a suite of synthetic data sets derived from known thermal histories with accompanying tutorial exercises in the Supplemental Material1. These data sets illustrate the opportunities and limitations of thermal history modeling. Examining these synthetic data helps to develop intuition about which thermochronometric data are most sensitive to different thermal events and to what extent user decisions on data handling and model setup can control the recovery of the true solution. We also use real data to demonstrate the importance of incorporating sensitivity testing into thermal history modeling and suggest several best practices for exploring model sensitivity to factors including, but not limited to, the model design or inversion algorithm, geologic constraints, data trends, the spatial relationship between samples, or the choice of kinetics model. Finally, we provide a detailed and explicit workflow and an applied example for a method of interrogating vague model results or low observation-prediction fits that we call the “Path Structure Approach.” Our explicit examination of thermal history modeling practices is designed to guide modelers to identify the factors controlling model results and demonstrate reproducible approaches for the interpretation of thermal histories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geosphere
Geosphere 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geosphere is GSA''s ambitious, online-only publication that addresses the growing need for timely publication of research results, data, software, and educational developments in ways that cannot be addressed by traditional formats. The journal''s rigorously peer-reviewed, high-quality research papers target an international audience in all geoscience fields. Its innovative format encourages extensive use of color, animations, interactivity, and oversize figures (maps, cross sections, etc.), and provides easy access to resources such as GIS databases, data archives, and modeling results. Geosphere''s broad scope and variety of contributions is a refreshing addition to traditional journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信