tada - glr - openstage跨声速轴流压气机RANS求解器的验证与验证

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Xiao He, Mingmin Zhu, Kailong Xia, Klausmann Fabian, Jinfang Teng, Mehdi Vahdati
{"title":"tada - glr - openstage跨声速轴流压气机RANS求解器的验证与验证","authors":"Xiao He, Mingmin Zhu, Kailong Xia, Klausmann Fabian, Jinfang Teng, Mehdi Vahdati","doi":"10.33737/jgpps/158034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comprehensive validation and verification study of turbomachinery Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow solvers on the transonic axial compressor TUDa-GLR-OpenStage. Two commercial solvers namely Ansys CFX and Numeca FineTurbo are adopted to provide the benchmark solutions, which can be used for verification of other RANS solvers in the future. Based on these solvers, five sets of grids, two advection schemes (i.e., central difference and second-order upwind), four turbulence models (i.e., SA, SA-RC, SST and EARSM) and two rotor-stator interface models (i.e., mixing plane and sliding plane) are investigated to quantify their effects on predicting the performance and the flow field of the compressor stage. Results show that the choices of grid density and turbulence model are most sensitive to the prediction, leading to 5% and 7% variation in compressor performance characteristics, respectively. Regarding the choice of grid density, a method to estimate the grid discretization error is demonstrated, which is transferrable to other cases. Regarding the choice of turbulence model, the EARSM model is found overall most accurate among the investigated models, and the limitations and deficiencies of the rest models are discussed in detail based on the analysis of the mean flow fields and the eddy viscosity fields. The grids and the major CFD results presented in this work are open-accessed to the community for further research. The results and discussions presented in this paper provide a useful reference for future practices of RANS simulations for compressors.","PeriodicalId":53002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and verification of RANS solvers for TUDa-GLR-OpenStage transonic axial compressor\",\"authors\":\"Xiao He, Mingmin Zhu, Kailong Xia, Klausmann Fabian, Jinfang Teng, Mehdi Vahdati\",\"doi\":\"10.33737/jgpps/158034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comprehensive validation and verification study of turbomachinery Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow solvers on the transonic axial compressor TUDa-GLR-OpenStage. Two commercial solvers namely Ansys CFX and Numeca FineTurbo are adopted to provide the benchmark solutions, which can be used for verification of other RANS solvers in the future. Based on these solvers, five sets of grids, two advection schemes (i.e., central difference and second-order upwind), four turbulence models (i.e., SA, SA-RC, SST and EARSM) and two rotor-stator interface models (i.e., mixing plane and sliding plane) are investigated to quantify their effects on predicting the performance and the flow field of the compressor stage. Results show that the choices of grid density and turbulence model are most sensitive to the prediction, leading to 5% and 7% variation in compressor performance characteristics, respectively. Regarding the choice of grid density, a method to estimate the grid discretization error is demonstrated, which is transferrable to other cases. Regarding the choice of turbulence model, the EARSM model is found overall most accurate among the investigated models, and the limitations and deficiencies of the rest models are discussed in detail based on the analysis of the mean flow fields and the eddy viscosity fields. The grids and the major CFD results presented in this work are open-accessed to the community for further research. The results and discussions presented in this paper provide a useful reference for future practices of RANS simulations for compressors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33737/jgpps/158034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33737/jgpps/158034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文在跨声速轴向压气机tada - glr - openstage上对叶轮机械雷诺-平均纳维-斯托克斯流动求解器进行了全面的验证研究。采用Ansys CFX和Numeca FineTurbo两款商用求解器提供基准解决方案,可用于未来对其他RANS求解器的验证。在此基础上,研究了五组网格、两种平流方案(中心差分和二阶迎风)、四种湍流模型(SA、SA- rc、SST和EARSM)和两种动静界面模型(混合面和滑动面)对压气机级性能和流场预测的影响。结果表明,网格密度和湍流模型的选择对预测最敏感,分别导致压气机性能特性变化5%和7%。对于网格密度的选择,给出了一种估计网格离散化误差的方法,该方法可推广到其他情况。在湍流模型的选择上,总体上认为EARSM模型是最准确的,并通过对平均流场和涡动黏度场的分析,详细讨论了其他模型的局限性和不足。网格和本工作中提出的主要CFD结果对社区开放,以供进一步研究。本文的研究结果和讨论为今后压缩机RANS仿真的实践提供了有益的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation and verification of RANS solvers for TUDa-GLR-OpenStage transonic axial compressor
This paper presents a comprehensive validation and verification study of turbomachinery Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes flow solvers on the transonic axial compressor TUDa-GLR-OpenStage. Two commercial solvers namely Ansys CFX and Numeca FineTurbo are adopted to provide the benchmark solutions, which can be used for verification of other RANS solvers in the future. Based on these solvers, five sets of grids, two advection schemes (i.e., central difference and second-order upwind), four turbulence models (i.e., SA, SA-RC, SST and EARSM) and two rotor-stator interface models (i.e., mixing plane and sliding plane) are investigated to quantify their effects on predicting the performance and the flow field of the compressor stage. Results show that the choices of grid density and turbulence model are most sensitive to the prediction, leading to 5% and 7% variation in compressor performance characteristics, respectively. Regarding the choice of grid density, a method to estimate the grid discretization error is demonstrated, which is transferrable to other cases. Regarding the choice of turbulence model, the EARSM model is found overall most accurate among the investigated models, and the limitations and deficiencies of the rest models are discussed in detail based on the analysis of the mean flow fields and the eddy viscosity fields. The grids and the major CFD results presented in this work are open-accessed to the community for further research. The results and discussions presented in this paper provide a useful reference for future practices of RANS simulations for compressors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society
Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信