应对高等教育中人工智能的伦理挑战:七项全球人工智能伦理政策分析

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Zouhaier Slimi, Beatriz Villarejo Carballido
{"title":"应对高等教育中人工智能的伦理挑战:七项全球人工智能伦理政策分析","authors":"Zouhaier Slimi, Beatriz Villarejo Carballido","doi":"10.18421/tem122-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AI use in higher education raises ethical concerns that must be addressed. Biased algorithms pose a significant threat, especially if used in admission or grading processes, as they could have devastating effects on students. Another issue is the displacement of human educators by AI systems, and there are concerns about transparency and accountability as AI becomes more integrated into decision-making processes. This paper examined three AI objectives related higher education: biased algorithms, AI and decision-making, and human displacement. Discourse analysis of seven AI ethics policies was conducted, including those from UNESCO, China, the European Commission, Google, MIT, Sanford HAI, and Carnegie Mellon. The findings indicate that stakeholders must work together to address these challenges and ensure responsible AI deployment in higher education while maximizing its benefits. Fair use and protecting individuals, especially those with vulnerable characteristics, are crucial. Gender bias must be avoided in algorithm development, learning data sets, and AI decision-making. Data collection, labeling, and algorithm documentation must be of the highest quality to ensure traceability and openness. Universities must study the ethical, social, and policy implications of AI to ensure responsible development and deployment. The AI ethics policies stress responsible AI development and deployment, with a focus on transparency and accountability. Making AI systems more transparent and answerable may reduce the adverse effects of displacement. In conclusion, AI must be considered ethically in higher education, and stakeholders must ensure that AI is used responsibly, fairly, and in a way that maximizes its benefits while minimizing its risks.","PeriodicalId":45439,"journal":{"name":"TEM Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies\",\"authors\":\"Zouhaier Slimi, Beatriz Villarejo Carballido\",\"doi\":\"10.18421/tem122-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AI use in higher education raises ethical concerns that must be addressed. Biased algorithms pose a significant threat, especially if used in admission or grading processes, as they could have devastating effects on students. Another issue is the displacement of human educators by AI systems, and there are concerns about transparency and accountability as AI becomes more integrated into decision-making processes. This paper examined three AI objectives related higher education: biased algorithms, AI and decision-making, and human displacement. Discourse analysis of seven AI ethics policies was conducted, including those from UNESCO, China, the European Commission, Google, MIT, Sanford HAI, and Carnegie Mellon. The findings indicate that stakeholders must work together to address these challenges and ensure responsible AI deployment in higher education while maximizing its benefits. Fair use and protecting individuals, especially those with vulnerable characteristics, are crucial. Gender bias must be avoided in algorithm development, learning data sets, and AI decision-making. Data collection, labeling, and algorithm documentation must be of the highest quality to ensure traceability and openness. Universities must study the ethical, social, and policy implications of AI to ensure responsible development and deployment. The AI ethics policies stress responsible AI development and deployment, with a focus on transparency and accountability. Making AI systems more transparent and answerable may reduce the adverse effects of displacement. In conclusion, AI must be considered ethically in higher education, and stakeholders must ensure that AI is used responsibly, fairly, and in a way that maximizes its benefits while minimizing its risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEM Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEM Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18421/tem122-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEM Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18421/tem122-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人工智能在高等教育中的应用引发了必须解决的伦理问题。有偏见的算法构成了重大威胁,尤其是在入学或评分过程中,因为它们可能对学生产生毁灭性的影响。另一个问题是人工智能系统取代了人类教育工作者,随着人工智能越来越多地融入决策过程,人们对透明度和问责制感到担忧。本文研究了与高等教育相关的三个人工智能目标:有偏见的算法、人工智能与决策以及人类流离失所。对来自联合国教科文组织、中国、欧盟委员会、谷歌、麻省理工学院、桑福德HAI和卡内基梅隆大学的7项人工智能伦理政策进行了话语分析。研究结果表明,利益相关者必须共同努力,应对这些挑战,确保在高等教育中负责任地部署人工智能,同时最大限度地提高其效益。合理使用和保护个人,特别是具有脆弱特征的个人,至关重要。在算法开发、学习数据集和人工智能决策中必须避免性别偏见。数据收集、标记和算法文档必须具有最高质量,以确保可追溯性和开放性。大学必须研究人工智能的伦理、社会和政策影响,以确保负责任的开发和部署。人工智能伦理政策强调负责任的人工智能开发和部署,重点是透明度和问责制。使人工智能系统更加透明和负责任,可能会减少流离失所的不利影响。总之,高等教育必须从道德上考虑人工智能,利益相关者必须确保人工智能的使用是负责任的、公平的,并以一种最大化其利益同时最小化其风险的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies
AI use in higher education raises ethical concerns that must be addressed. Biased algorithms pose a significant threat, especially if used in admission or grading processes, as they could have devastating effects on students. Another issue is the displacement of human educators by AI systems, and there are concerns about transparency and accountability as AI becomes more integrated into decision-making processes. This paper examined three AI objectives related higher education: biased algorithms, AI and decision-making, and human displacement. Discourse analysis of seven AI ethics policies was conducted, including those from UNESCO, China, the European Commission, Google, MIT, Sanford HAI, and Carnegie Mellon. The findings indicate that stakeholders must work together to address these challenges and ensure responsible AI deployment in higher education while maximizing its benefits. Fair use and protecting individuals, especially those with vulnerable characteristics, are crucial. Gender bias must be avoided in algorithm development, learning data sets, and AI decision-making. Data collection, labeling, and algorithm documentation must be of the highest quality to ensure traceability and openness. Universities must study the ethical, social, and policy implications of AI to ensure responsible development and deployment. The AI ethics policies stress responsible AI development and deployment, with a focus on transparency and accountability. Making AI systems more transparent and answerable may reduce the adverse effects of displacement. In conclusion, AI must be considered ethically in higher education, and stakeholders must ensure that AI is used responsibly, fairly, and in a way that maximizes its benefits while minimizing its risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
TEM Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics
TEM Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
176
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: TEM JOURNAL - Technology, Education, Management, Informatics Is a an Open Access, Double-blind peer reviewed journal that publishes articles of interdisciplinary sciences: • Technology, • Computer and informatics sciences, • Education, • Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信