信息检索中的公平

Danielle Rabb
{"title":"信息检索中的公平","authors":"Danielle Rabb","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2023.747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical librarians and information specialists have unique evidence retrieval skills that can help health technology assessment organizations reduce bias in the evidence they use: They identify gaps in mainstream evidence sources and seek out alternatives that provide the perspectives of underrepresented populations. They create complex and efficient database searches that encompass the wide variety of synonyms and phrases used to describe health disparities and inequities. They use sound, logical, and efficient ways to access evidence from paywalled systems while respecting rights of ownership. They critically appraise information systems to determine if they emphasize biases and inequities or create new ones.","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"206 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity in Information Retrieval\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Rabb\",\"doi\":\"10.51731/cjht.2023.747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medical librarians and information specialists have unique evidence retrieval skills that can help health technology assessment organizations reduce bias in the evidence they use: They identify gaps in mainstream evidence sources and seek out alternatives that provide the perspectives of underrepresented populations. They create complex and efficient database searches that encompass the wide variety of synonyms and phrases used to describe health disparities and inequities. They use sound, logical, and efficient ways to access evidence from paywalled systems while respecting rights of ownership. They critically appraise information systems to determine if they emphasize biases and inequities or create new ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"206 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2023.747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2023.747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学图书馆员和信息专家拥有独特的证据检索技能,可以帮助卫生技术评估组织减少他们使用的证据的偏见:他们确定主流证据来源中的差距,并寻找能够提供代表性不足人群观点的替代方案。他们创建了复杂而高效的数据库搜索,其中包含用于描述健康差异和不平等的各种同义词和短语。他们在尊重所有权的同时,使用合理、合理和有效的方式从付费系统中获取证据。他们批判性地评估信息系统,以确定它们是强调偏见和不公平,还是创造新的偏见和不公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equity in Information Retrieval
Medical librarians and information specialists have unique evidence retrieval skills that can help health technology assessment organizations reduce bias in the evidence they use: They identify gaps in mainstream evidence sources and seek out alternatives that provide the perspectives of underrepresented populations. They create complex and efficient database searches that encompass the wide variety of synonyms and phrases used to describe health disparities and inequities. They use sound, logical, and efficient ways to access evidence from paywalled systems while respecting rights of ownership. They critically appraise information systems to determine if they emphasize biases and inequities or create new ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信