欧盟的企业和贸易政策游说活动

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Marcel Hanegraaff, Arlo Poletti, Emile Van Ommeren
{"title":"欧盟的企业和贸易政策游说活动","authors":"Marcel Hanegraaff,&nbsp;Arlo Poletti,&nbsp;Emile Van Ommeren","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our understanding of the role of firms in the making of European Union (EU) trade policy remains partial. This article contributes to expanding this literature by investigating under what conditions we observe more firm-centric lobbying, compared to business associational lobbying, in EU trade policy. We advance the arguments that firm-centric political lobbying in EU trade policy-making is a function of both industry and country-level characteristics. Relying on an original dataset of lobbying contacts with the EU Trade Commissioner, his or her cabinet members and the Director-General between 2014 and 2018, we find that the likelihood of firm-centric lobbying increases in (1) EU industries displaying high levels of multinational corporations' activity, global sourcing of intermediates and product differentiation and (2) countries characterized as liberal market economies. Besides showing that firm-centric models of trade travel well in the EU context, we contribute to advancing the understanding of how domestic political institutions affect the politics of trade.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"62 3","pages":"629-652"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13520","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firms and Trade Policy Lobbying in the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Hanegraaff,&nbsp;Arlo Poletti,&nbsp;Emile Van Ommeren\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcms.13520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Our understanding of the role of firms in the making of European Union (EU) trade policy remains partial. This article contributes to expanding this literature by investigating under what conditions we observe more firm-centric lobbying, compared to business associational lobbying, in EU trade policy. We advance the arguments that firm-centric political lobbying in EU trade policy-making is a function of both industry and country-level characteristics. Relying on an original dataset of lobbying contacts with the EU Trade Commissioner, his or her cabinet members and the Director-General between 2014 and 2018, we find that the likelihood of firm-centric lobbying increases in (1) EU industries displaying high levels of multinational corporations' activity, global sourcing of intermediates and product differentiation and (2) countries characterized as liberal market economies. Besides showing that firm-centric models of trade travel well in the EU context, we contribute to advancing the understanding of how domestic political institutions affect the politics of trade.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"629-652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13520\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13520\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13520","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对企业在欧洲联盟(欧盟)贸易政策制定过程中所扮演角色的理解仍然是片面的。本文通过研究我们在欧盟贸易政策中观察到的以企业为中心的游说比以商业协会为中心的游说在什么条件下更多,从而为拓展这一文献做出贡献。我们提出的论点是,欧盟贸易政策制定中以企业为中心的政治游说是行业和国家层面特征的函数。根据 2014 年至 2018 年期间与欧盟贸易专员、其内阁成员和总干事进行游说接触的原始数据集,我们发现,在(1)跨国公司活动频繁、中间产品全球采购和产品差异化程度高的欧盟行业,以及(2)自由市场经济国家,以企业为中心进行游说的可能性会增加。除了表明以企业为中心的贸易模型在欧盟背景下行之有效之外,我们还有助于加深对国内政治体制如何影响贸易政治的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Firms and Trade Policy Lobbying in the European Union

Firms and Trade Policy Lobbying in the European Union

Our understanding of the role of firms in the making of European Union (EU) trade policy remains partial. This article contributes to expanding this literature by investigating under what conditions we observe more firm-centric lobbying, compared to business associational lobbying, in EU trade policy. We advance the arguments that firm-centric political lobbying in EU trade policy-making is a function of both industry and country-level characteristics. Relying on an original dataset of lobbying contacts with the EU Trade Commissioner, his or her cabinet members and the Director-General between 2014 and 2018, we find that the likelihood of firm-centric lobbying increases in (1) EU industries displaying high levels of multinational corporations' activity, global sourcing of intermediates and product differentiation and (2) countries characterized as liberal market economies. Besides showing that firm-centric models of trade travel well in the EU context, we contribute to advancing the understanding of how domestic political institutions affect the politics of trade.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信