Grant Greaves, Kaitlyn G Harding, Brent Parker, Vu C Nguyen, Azim Ahmed, Belinda Yee, Joël Perren, Mathew Norman, Morgan Grey, Rafael Perini, Fahd Jowhari, Adrian Bak
{"title":"全麻与清醒镇静下内镜逆行胆管造影的比较研究","authors":"Grant Greaves, Kaitlyn G Harding, Brent Parker, Vu C Nguyen, Azim Ahmed, Belinda Yee, Joël Perren, Mathew Norman, Morgan Grey, Rafael Perini, Fahd Jowhari, Adrian Bak","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used to diagnose and treat pancreatic and biliary disease. The current standard is to conduct ERCP under conscious sedation (CS). Patient movement and agitation during ERCP under CS can result in procedure failure and complications. Aiming to reduce procedure failure rates and complications, Kelowna General Hospital (KGH) in British Columbia, Canada transitioned to performing ERCP under general anesthesia (GA) as the practice standard. Objective To determine if conducting ERCP under GA compared to CS decreases procedure complications, particularly post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods The charts of 2,198 patients who underwent ERCP at KGH between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. Before September 17, 2017, ERCP was performed under CS (n = 1,316). Afterwards, ERCP was conducted under GA (n = 882). Demographic, clinical, and procedural data were extracted. The data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. Results Procedure failure rates (CS = 9 percent, GA = 3 percent, P < 0.001) decreased in the GA cohort after adjusting for age, sex, and co-morbidities. Thirty-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, returns post-discharge, PEP, and cholangitis rates were similar between cohorts. Conclusion Performing ERCP under GA compared to CS resulted in an increase in procedural success rates. Other complication rates were similar between groups.","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Under General Anesthesia Compared to Conscious Sedation Study\",\"authors\":\"Grant Greaves, Kaitlyn G Harding, Brent Parker, Vu C Nguyen, Azim Ahmed, Belinda Yee, Joël Perren, Mathew Norman, Morgan Grey, Rafael Perini, Fahd Jowhari, Adrian Bak\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jcag/gwad037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used to diagnose and treat pancreatic and biliary disease. The current standard is to conduct ERCP under conscious sedation (CS). Patient movement and agitation during ERCP under CS can result in procedure failure and complications. Aiming to reduce procedure failure rates and complications, Kelowna General Hospital (KGH) in British Columbia, Canada transitioned to performing ERCP under general anesthesia (GA) as the practice standard. Objective To determine if conducting ERCP under GA compared to CS decreases procedure complications, particularly post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods The charts of 2,198 patients who underwent ERCP at KGH between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. Before September 17, 2017, ERCP was performed under CS (n = 1,316). Afterwards, ERCP was conducted under GA (n = 882). Demographic, clinical, and procedural data were extracted. The data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. Results Procedure failure rates (CS = 9 percent, GA = 3 percent, P < 0.001) decreased in the GA cohort after adjusting for age, sex, and co-morbidities. Thirty-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, returns post-discharge, PEP, and cholangitis rates were similar between cohorts. Conclusion Performing ERCP under GA compared to CS resulted in an increase in procedural success rates. Other complication rates were similar between groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)用于胰腺和胆道疾病的诊断和治疗。目前的标准是在意识镇静(CS)下进行ERCP。在CS下进行ERCP时,患者的运动和躁动可能导致手术失败和并发症。为了降低手术失败率和并发症,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的Kelowna总医院(KGH)将在全身麻醉(GA)下实施ERCP作为实践标准。目的探讨与CS相比,GA下进行ERCP是否能减少手术并发症,特别是ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)。方法回顾2015年至2020年在KGH接受ERCP治疗的2198例患者的病历。2017年9月17日前,在CS下行ERCP (n = 1316)。然后在GA下进行ERCP (n = 882)。提取了人口学、临床和手术数据。采用单因素和多因素统计分析对数据进行分析。结果手术失败率(CS = 9%, GA = 3%, P <0.001),在调整了年龄、性别和合并症后,GA队列中下降。30天死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)转院、出院后复诊、PEP和胆管炎发生率在队列之间相似。结论在GA下行ERCP比CS下行ERCP成功率高。两组间其他并发症发生率相似。
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Under General Anesthesia Compared to Conscious Sedation Study
Abstract Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used to diagnose and treat pancreatic and biliary disease. The current standard is to conduct ERCP under conscious sedation (CS). Patient movement and agitation during ERCP under CS can result in procedure failure and complications. Aiming to reduce procedure failure rates and complications, Kelowna General Hospital (KGH) in British Columbia, Canada transitioned to performing ERCP under general anesthesia (GA) as the practice standard. Objective To determine if conducting ERCP under GA compared to CS decreases procedure complications, particularly post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Methods The charts of 2,198 patients who underwent ERCP at KGH between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. Before September 17, 2017, ERCP was performed under CS (n = 1,316). Afterwards, ERCP was conducted under GA (n = 882). Demographic, clinical, and procedural data were extracted. The data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. Results Procedure failure rates (CS = 9 percent, GA = 3 percent, P < 0.001) decreased in the GA cohort after adjusting for age, sex, and co-morbidities. Thirty-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, returns post-discharge, PEP, and cholangitis rates were similar between cohorts. Conclusion Performing ERCP under GA compared to CS resulted in an increase in procedural success rates. Other complication rates were similar between groups.