俄罗斯历史上的阅读实践和印刷品的使用

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Yelizaveta Raykhlina
{"title":"俄罗斯历史上的阅读实践和印刷品的使用","authors":"Yelizaveta Raykhlina","doi":"10.1353/kri.2023.a910986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading Practices and the Uses of Print in Russian History Yelizaveta Raykhlina (bio) Damiano Rebecchini and Raffaella Vassena, eds., Reading Russia: A History of Reading in Modern Russia, vols. 1–3. 295 + 561 + 435 pp. Milan: Ledizioni, 2020. ISBN-13 978-8855261920 (vol. 1), 978-8855261937 (vol. 2), 978-8867055944 (vol. 3). Open access via OpenEdition Books. Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, eds., Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution. xv + 264 pp. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. ISBN-13 978-1350246768. $40.95. The history of Russian civil society has been examined by scholars looking to explain the underdevelopment of independent political institutions, weak rule of law, and relative illiberalism of successive Russian regimes across the centuries.1 Turning to the history of reading, printing, and the control of public discourse, scholars once saw imperial Russia's public sphere as lacking in critical mass and degree of political influence in comparison to its European and North American counterparts, while Soviet publics were constrained under the tight control of the state. This understanding has undergone significant revision in recent decades, as scholars have interrogated both the prescriptive categories and models of Western political theory, and as new research has uncovered broader types of agency and participation across Russian history. Working largely in the disciplines of literature, history, and historical sociology, these approaches [End Page 886] have produced deeply researched studies of publishers, presses, publics, and readers in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union. Examining questions such as canon formation and marketplace influence, literary scholars have looked to the Formalist tradition, semiotics, and sociological concepts to provide critical context and analysis for understanding the work of renowned authors and their \"classics.\"2 Historians, inspired by the Annales school and the various historiographical \"turns\"—cultural, imperial, transnational—have explored the manifold applications and uses of publishing, from mass readerships and cultural production to the entanglements among writers, publishers, politics, and the state.3 Cumulatively, this research has not only underscored the integral role of reading and texts for understanding the imperial and Soviet periods but has also pointed to multiple new avenues for scholars to explore. This review focuses on four edited volumes which do precisely that: examine text consumption and production using novel and multidisciplinary approaches. Reading Russia: A History of Reading in Modern Russia, the three-volume series edited by Damiano Rebecchini and Raffaella Vassena, surveys Russian reading practices from the late 17th century to the post-Soviet period, while Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution, edited by Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, provides an innovative approach to studying publishing in imperial Russia from the late 17th century to 1917. The four titles have several elements in common. First, all four edited collections present the cumulative effort of scholars using varying methodologies to explore a related set of questions and concepts, thus pointing to new directions in what is a highly multiand often interdisciplinary area of study. Second, the volumes complement [End Page 887] one another by exploring two entangled questions, with the Reading Russia volumes asking how readers responded to, and interacted with, Russian texts and the evolving literary culture over time, and Publishing in Tsarist Russia asking how imperial subjects made use of Russian-language publishing across the empire's vast geography to access participation within the imperial order. Third, the four volumes cover critical historiographical terrain while also spotlighting primary source research through case studies and suggested further reading. Finally, while not adhering to a single theoretical approach, both Reading Russia and Publishing in Tsarist Russia suggest complications of, and even challenges to well-worn methodological categories, particularly—as the editors' introductions argue—those associated with Jürgen Habermas's theory of the public sphere and Benedict Anderson's understanding of the links between language, nationalism, and print capitalism. _____ The three-volume Reading Russia is dedicated to the long-challenging task of analyzing reader response and reception to the Russian word.4 The editors' introduction presents the volumes as not only an attempt to correct a long-standing overemphasis in literary studies on authors and texts by focusing specifically on readers and reading...","PeriodicalId":45639,"journal":{"name":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Practices and the Uses of Print in Russian History\",\"authors\":\"Yelizaveta Raykhlina\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/kri.2023.a910986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reading Practices and the Uses of Print in Russian History Yelizaveta Raykhlina (bio) Damiano Rebecchini and Raffaella Vassena, eds., Reading Russia: A History of Reading in Modern Russia, vols. 1–3. 295 + 561 + 435 pp. Milan: Ledizioni, 2020. ISBN-13 978-8855261920 (vol. 1), 978-8855261937 (vol. 2), 978-8867055944 (vol. 3). Open access via OpenEdition Books. Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, eds., Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution. xv + 264 pp. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. ISBN-13 978-1350246768. $40.95. The history of Russian civil society has been examined by scholars looking to explain the underdevelopment of independent political institutions, weak rule of law, and relative illiberalism of successive Russian regimes across the centuries.1 Turning to the history of reading, printing, and the control of public discourse, scholars once saw imperial Russia's public sphere as lacking in critical mass and degree of political influence in comparison to its European and North American counterparts, while Soviet publics were constrained under the tight control of the state. This understanding has undergone significant revision in recent decades, as scholars have interrogated both the prescriptive categories and models of Western political theory, and as new research has uncovered broader types of agency and participation across Russian history. Working largely in the disciplines of literature, history, and historical sociology, these approaches [End Page 886] have produced deeply researched studies of publishers, presses, publics, and readers in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union. Examining questions such as canon formation and marketplace influence, literary scholars have looked to the Formalist tradition, semiotics, and sociological concepts to provide critical context and analysis for understanding the work of renowned authors and their \\\"classics.\\\"2 Historians, inspired by the Annales school and the various historiographical \\\"turns\\\"—cultural, imperial, transnational—have explored the manifold applications and uses of publishing, from mass readerships and cultural production to the entanglements among writers, publishers, politics, and the state.3 Cumulatively, this research has not only underscored the integral role of reading and texts for understanding the imperial and Soviet periods but has also pointed to multiple new avenues for scholars to explore. This review focuses on four edited volumes which do precisely that: examine text consumption and production using novel and multidisciplinary approaches. Reading Russia: A History of Reading in Modern Russia, the three-volume series edited by Damiano Rebecchini and Raffaella Vassena, surveys Russian reading practices from the late 17th century to the post-Soviet period, while Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution, edited by Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, provides an innovative approach to studying publishing in imperial Russia from the late 17th century to 1917. The four titles have several elements in common. First, all four edited collections present the cumulative effort of scholars using varying methodologies to explore a related set of questions and concepts, thus pointing to new directions in what is a highly multiand often interdisciplinary area of study. Second, the volumes complement [End Page 887] one another by exploring two entangled questions, with the Reading Russia volumes asking how readers responded to, and interacted with, Russian texts and the evolving literary culture over time, and Publishing in Tsarist Russia asking how imperial subjects made use of Russian-language publishing across the empire's vast geography to access participation within the imperial order. Third, the four volumes cover critical historiographical terrain while also spotlighting primary source research through case studies and suggested further reading. Finally, while not adhering to a single theoretical approach, both Reading Russia and Publishing in Tsarist Russia suggest complications of, and even challenges to well-worn methodological categories, particularly—as the editors' introductions argue—those associated with Jürgen Habermas's theory of the public sphere and Benedict Anderson's understanding of the links between language, nationalism, and print capitalism. _____ The three-volume Reading Russia is dedicated to the long-challenging task of analyzing reader response and reception to the Russian word.4 The editors' introduction presents the volumes as not only an attempt to correct a long-standing overemphasis in literary studies on authors and texts by focusing specifically on readers and reading...\",\"PeriodicalId\":45639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2023.a910986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2023.a910986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阅读实践和使用印刷在俄罗斯历史叶利扎维塔·雷克莉娜(生物)Damiano Rebecchini和Raffaella Vassena,编。,《阅读俄罗斯:现代俄罗斯阅读史》,卷。1 - 3。295 + 561 + 435页。米兰:Ledizioni, 2020。ISBN-13 978-8855261920 (vol. 1), 978-8855261937 (vol. 2), 978-8867055944 (vol. 3).通过OpenEdition Books开放获取。Tatsumi Yukiko and tsuumi太郎编。《沙俄的出版:从启蒙运动到革命的印刷媒体史》xv + 264 pp.纽约:布鲁姆斯伯里学术,2020。ISBN-13 978 - 1350246768。40.95美元。学者们研究了俄罗斯公民社会的历史,试图解释几个世纪以来独立政治机构的不发达、法治的薄弱以及俄罗斯历届政权的相对非自由主义在阅读、印刷和公共话语控制的历史上,学者们曾经认为,与欧洲和北美的同行相比,帝国俄罗斯的公共领域缺乏临界质量和政治影响程度,而苏联公众则受到国家严格控制的约束。近几十年来,随着学者们对西方政治理论的规范性类别和模型进行了质疑,以及新的研究揭示了俄罗斯历史上更广泛的代理和参与类型,这种理解经历了重大的修订。这些方法主要在文学、历史和历史社会学的学科中工作,对俄罗斯帝国和苏联的出版商、出版社、公众和读者进行了深入的研究。考察诸如经典的形成和市场的影响等问题,文学学者们着眼于形式主义传统、符号学和社会学概念,为理解著名作家的作品和他们的“经典”提供关键的背景和分析。历史学家受到《年鉴》学派和各种史学“转向”——文化的、帝国的、跨国的——的启发,探索了出版的多种应用和用途,从大众读者和文化生产到作家、出版商、政治和国家之间的纠缠总的来说,这项研究不仅强调了阅读和文本对理解帝国和苏联时期的不可或缺的作用,而且还指出了学者探索的多种新途径。这篇评论集中在四个编辑卷,正是这样做的:检查文本消费和生产使用新颖的和多学科的方法。由Damiano Rebecchini和Raffaella Vassena编辑的三卷本系列丛书《阅读俄罗斯:现代俄罗斯阅读史》调查了从17世纪末到后苏联时期的俄罗斯阅读实践,而由Tatsumi Yukiko和Tsurumi太郎编辑的《沙皇俄罗斯出版:从启蒙运动到革命的印刷媒体史》则为研究17世纪末到1917年的帝国俄罗斯出版提供了一种创新的方法。这四个标题有几个共同点。首先,所有四个编辑的集合呈现了学者们使用不同的方法来探索一组相关的问题和概念的累积努力,从而指出了一个高度多元且经常是跨学科的研究领域的新方向。第二,这两卷书通过探索两个相互纠结的问题来相互补充,其中《阅读俄罗斯》卷书询问读者如何回应俄罗斯文本和随着时间的推移不断发展的文学文化,并与之互动,《沙皇俄国的出版》卷书询问帝国臣民如何在帝国广阔的地理范围内利用俄语出版来参与帝国秩序。第三,这四卷涵盖了重要的史学领域,同时也通过案例研究和建议进一步阅读来突出主要来源研究。最后,虽然没有坚持单一的理论方法,但《阅读俄罗斯》和《在沙皇俄国出版》都提出了复杂的,甚至是对陈旧的方法论类别的挑战,尤其是——正如编辑们的介绍所争论的——那些与j根·哈贝马斯的公共领域理论和本尼迪克特·安德森对语言、民族主义和印刷资本主义之间联系的理解有关的方法。_____三卷本的《阅读俄罗斯》致力于分析读者对俄语的反应和接受,这是一项长期具有挑战性的任务编辑们的介绍不仅是为了纠正长期以来过分强调作者和文本的文学研究,特别关注读者和阅读……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading Practices and the Uses of Print in Russian History
Reading Practices and the Uses of Print in Russian History Yelizaveta Raykhlina (bio) Damiano Rebecchini and Raffaella Vassena, eds., Reading Russia: A History of Reading in Modern Russia, vols. 1–3. 295 + 561 + 435 pp. Milan: Ledizioni, 2020. ISBN-13 978-8855261920 (vol. 1), 978-8855261937 (vol. 2), 978-8867055944 (vol. 3). Open access via OpenEdition Books. Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, eds., Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution. xv + 264 pp. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. ISBN-13 978-1350246768. $40.95. The history of Russian civil society has been examined by scholars looking to explain the underdevelopment of independent political institutions, weak rule of law, and relative illiberalism of successive Russian regimes across the centuries.1 Turning to the history of reading, printing, and the control of public discourse, scholars once saw imperial Russia's public sphere as lacking in critical mass and degree of political influence in comparison to its European and North American counterparts, while Soviet publics were constrained under the tight control of the state. This understanding has undergone significant revision in recent decades, as scholars have interrogated both the prescriptive categories and models of Western political theory, and as new research has uncovered broader types of agency and participation across Russian history. Working largely in the disciplines of literature, history, and historical sociology, these approaches [End Page 886] have produced deeply researched studies of publishers, presses, publics, and readers in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union. Examining questions such as canon formation and marketplace influence, literary scholars have looked to the Formalist tradition, semiotics, and sociological concepts to provide critical context and analysis for understanding the work of renowned authors and their "classics."2 Historians, inspired by the Annales school and the various historiographical "turns"—cultural, imperial, transnational—have explored the manifold applications and uses of publishing, from mass readerships and cultural production to the entanglements among writers, publishers, politics, and the state.3 Cumulatively, this research has not only underscored the integral role of reading and texts for understanding the imperial and Soviet periods but has also pointed to multiple new avenues for scholars to explore. This review focuses on four edited volumes which do precisely that: examine text consumption and production using novel and multidisciplinary approaches. Reading Russia: A History of Reading in Modern Russia, the three-volume series edited by Damiano Rebecchini and Raffaella Vassena, surveys Russian reading practices from the late 17th century to the post-Soviet period, while Publishing in Tsarist Russia: A History of Print Media from Enlightenment to Revolution, edited by Yukiko Tatsumi and Taro Tsurumi, provides an innovative approach to studying publishing in imperial Russia from the late 17th century to 1917. The four titles have several elements in common. First, all four edited collections present the cumulative effort of scholars using varying methodologies to explore a related set of questions and concepts, thus pointing to new directions in what is a highly multiand often interdisciplinary area of study. Second, the volumes complement [End Page 887] one another by exploring two entangled questions, with the Reading Russia volumes asking how readers responded to, and interacted with, Russian texts and the evolving literary culture over time, and Publishing in Tsarist Russia asking how imperial subjects made use of Russian-language publishing across the empire's vast geography to access participation within the imperial order. Third, the four volumes cover critical historiographical terrain while also spotlighting primary source research through case studies and suggested further reading. Finally, while not adhering to a single theoretical approach, both Reading Russia and Publishing in Tsarist Russia suggest complications of, and even challenges to well-worn methodological categories, particularly—as the editors' introductions argue—those associated with Jürgen Habermas's theory of the public sphere and Benedict Anderson's understanding of the links between language, nationalism, and print capitalism. _____ The three-volume Reading Russia is dedicated to the long-challenging task of analyzing reader response and reception to the Russian word.4 The editors' introduction presents the volumes as not only an attempt to correct a long-standing overemphasis in literary studies on authors and texts by focusing specifically on readers and reading...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: A leading journal of Russian and Eurasian history and culture, Kritika is dedicated to internationalizing the field and making it relevant to a broad interdisciplinary audience. The journal regularly publishes forums, discussions, and special issues; it regularly translates important works by Russian and European scholars into English; and it publishes in every issue in-depth, lengthy review articles, review essays, and reviews of Russian, Eurasian, and European works that are rarely, if ever, reviewed in North American Russian studies journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信