基于CPTU数据的土体力学特性测定

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Iwona Chmielewska
{"title":"基于CPTU数据的土体力学特性测定","authors":"Iwona Chmielewska","doi":"10.2478/acee-2023-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study aimed to interpret the results of cone penetration tests with pore pressure measurement (CPTU). Tests were performed on a section of the designed road about 200 m long. The subsoil under consideration was characterized by organic soils deposited to a depth of approximately 8 m. Due to the problematic soil and water conditions, improvement with geosynthetic encased columns (GEC) was performed. According to the Recommendations for Design and Analysis of Earth Structures using Geosynthetic Reinforcements – EBGEO, the constrained modulus E oed and effective friction angle φ’ of soil below the GEC column base should be higher than 5 MPa ( E oed > 5 MPa) and 30° ( φ’ > 30°), respectively. In this study, the E oed and φ’ parameters were determined based on CPTU tests conducted in 12 locations. Analysis of the CPTU data showed that the constrained modulus and effective friction angle of the soil deposited below the GEC column base did not meet EBGEO requirements in most locations. It was also concluded that the minimum value of the constrained modulus required by EBGEO is too low compared with the requested value of the effective friction angle.","PeriodicalId":8117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture Civil Engineering Environment","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Mechanical Properties of Soils Based on CPTU Data\",\"authors\":\"Iwona Chmielewska\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/acee-2023-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The study aimed to interpret the results of cone penetration tests with pore pressure measurement (CPTU). Tests were performed on a section of the designed road about 200 m long. The subsoil under consideration was characterized by organic soils deposited to a depth of approximately 8 m. Due to the problematic soil and water conditions, improvement with geosynthetic encased columns (GEC) was performed. According to the Recommendations for Design and Analysis of Earth Structures using Geosynthetic Reinforcements – EBGEO, the constrained modulus E oed and effective friction angle φ’ of soil below the GEC column base should be higher than 5 MPa ( E oed > 5 MPa) and 30° ( φ’ > 30°), respectively. In this study, the E oed and φ’ parameters were determined based on CPTU tests conducted in 12 locations. Analysis of the CPTU data showed that the constrained modulus and effective friction angle of the soil deposited below the GEC column base did not meet EBGEO requirements in most locations. It was also concluded that the minimum value of the constrained modulus required by EBGEO is too low compared with the requested value of the effective friction angle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture Civil Engineering Environment\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture Civil Engineering Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2023-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture Civil Engineering Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/acee-2023-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在解释孔压测量(CPTU)锥入试验的结果。试验是在设计的一段约200米长的道路上进行的。所考虑的底土以有机土壤为特征,沉积深度约为8 m。由于土壤和水条件的问题,采用土工合成包壳柱(GEC)进行了改进。根据《土工合成材料加筋土工结构设计与分析建议- EBGEO》,GEC柱底部以下土体的约束模量eoed和有效摩擦角φ '应大于5 MPa (eoed >5 MPa)和30°(φ ' >分别为30°)。在本研究中,通过在12个地点进行CPTU试验,确定了eed和φ '参数。CPTU数据分析表明,在大多数位置,GEC柱底下土体的约束模量和有效摩擦角不满足EBGEO要求。与有效摩擦角的要求值相比,EBGEO要求的约束模量的最小值过低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Mechanical Properties of Soils Based on CPTU Data
Abstract The study aimed to interpret the results of cone penetration tests with pore pressure measurement (CPTU). Tests were performed on a section of the designed road about 200 m long. The subsoil under consideration was characterized by organic soils deposited to a depth of approximately 8 m. Due to the problematic soil and water conditions, improvement with geosynthetic encased columns (GEC) was performed. According to the Recommendations for Design and Analysis of Earth Structures using Geosynthetic Reinforcements – EBGEO, the constrained modulus E oed and effective friction angle φ’ of soil below the GEC column base should be higher than 5 MPa ( E oed > 5 MPa) and 30° ( φ’ > 30°), respectively. In this study, the E oed and φ’ parameters were determined based on CPTU tests conducted in 12 locations. Analysis of the CPTU data showed that the constrained modulus and effective friction angle of the soil deposited below the GEC column base did not meet EBGEO requirements in most locations. It was also concluded that the minimum value of the constrained modulus required by EBGEO is too low compared with the requested value of the effective friction angle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信