是什么决定了农林业实践在农田和公共土地上的采用?尼泊尔德莱地区的案例研究

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Prabin Bhusal, Kavi Raj Awasthi, Matthew Low, Naresh Shrestha, Asmit Neupane, Naya Sharma Paudel, Bir Bahadur Khanal Chhetri, Rajan Parajuli
{"title":"是什么决定了农林业实践在农田和公共土地上的采用?尼泊尔德莱地区的案例研究","authors":"Prabin Bhusal, Kavi Raj Awasthi, Matthew Low, Naresh Shrestha, Asmit Neupane, Naya Sharma Paudel, Bir Bahadur Khanal Chhetri, Rajan Parajuli","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2269531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWhile agroforestry has been well acknowledged for its influential role and benefits in integrated resource management in the global south, its adoption in forest-rich countries with existing community conflict situations is under-explored. Through structured questionnaire surveys and focus group discussions, this study explored the context and factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry practices on farmlands and public lands in the Terai region of southern Nepal. Results from logistic regression models revealed that adoption of agroforestry practices on both farmland and public land could contribute to mitigating conflicts between northern and southern communities. In addition, the adoption of agroforestry practices can be explained by socio-demographic and economic factors such as education, ethnicity, well-being, and gender. Strong cooperation between agroforestry initiatives and local institutions such as forest user groups and local governments in educating and empowering local people from lower socio-economic backgrounds is critical for widespread adoption of agroforestry practices in similar resource-use conflict regions.Keywords: Community forestrylanduse and managementconflict managementnorthern and southern communities Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by authors.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by The Rufford Foundation, UK, Grant no: 26820-B.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Determines the Adoption of Agroforestry Practices in Farmlands and Public Lands? A Case Study from the Terai Region in Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Prabin Bhusal, Kavi Raj Awasthi, Matthew Low, Naresh Shrestha, Asmit Neupane, Naya Sharma Paudel, Bir Bahadur Khanal Chhetri, Rajan Parajuli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08941920.2023.2269531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractWhile agroforestry has been well acknowledged for its influential role and benefits in integrated resource management in the global south, its adoption in forest-rich countries with existing community conflict situations is under-explored. Through structured questionnaire surveys and focus group discussions, this study explored the context and factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry practices on farmlands and public lands in the Terai region of southern Nepal. Results from logistic regression models revealed that adoption of agroforestry practices on both farmland and public land could contribute to mitigating conflicts between northern and southern communities. In addition, the adoption of agroforestry practices can be explained by socio-demographic and economic factors such as education, ethnicity, well-being, and gender. Strong cooperation between agroforestry initiatives and local institutions such as forest user groups and local governments in educating and empowering local people from lower socio-economic backgrounds is critical for widespread adoption of agroforestry practices in similar resource-use conflict regions.Keywords: Community forestrylanduse and managementconflict managementnorthern and southern communities Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by authors.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by The Rufford Foundation, UK, Grant no: 26820-B.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society & Natural Resources\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society & Natural Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2269531\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2269531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要农林业在全球发展中国家的综合资源管理中具有重要的作用和效益,这已经得到了广泛的认可,但是在森林资源丰富、存在社区冲突的国家采用农林业还没有得到充分的探索。通过结构化问卷调查和焦点小组讨论,本研究探讨了影响尼泊尔南部Terai地区农田和公共土地采用农林业做法的背景和因素。逻辑回归模型的结果显示,在农田和公共土地上采用农林业实践有助于缓解北方和南方社区之间的冲突。此外,农林业做法的采用可以用教育、种族、福利和性别等社会人口和经济因素来解释。农林业倡议与森林用户团体和地方政府等地方机构在教育和增强社会经济背景较低的当地人民的能力方面进行强有力的合作,对于在类似的资源使用冲突地区广泛采用农林业做法至关重要。关键词:社区林业土地利用与管理冲突管理南北社区披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。本研究由英国拉夫福德基金会资助,批准号:26820-B。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Determines the Adoption of Agroforestry Practices in Farmlands and Public Lands? A Case Study from the Terai Region in Nepal
AbstractWhile agroforestry has been well acknowledged for its influential role and benefits in integrated resource management in the global south, its adoption in forest-rich countries with existing community conflict situations is under-explored. Through structured questionnaire surveys and focus group discussions, this study explored the context and factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry practices on farmlands and public lands in the Terai region of southern Nepal. Results from logistic regression models revealed that adoption of agroforestry practices on both farmland and public land could contribute to mitigating conflicts between northern and southern communities. In addition, the adoption of agroforestry practices can be explained by socio-demographic and economic factors such as education, ethnicity, well-being, and gender. Strong cooperation between agroforestry initiatives and local institutions such as forest user groups and local governments in educating and empowering local people from lower socio-economic backgrounds is critical for widespread adoption of agroforestry practices in similar resource-use conflict regions.Keywords: Community forestrylanduse and managementconflict managementnorthern and southern communities Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by authors.Additional informationFundingThis research was funded by The Rufford Foundation, UK, Grant no: 26820-B.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信