Re = 10,000时Taylor-Couette-Poiseuille流动的数值模拟

IF 1.8 Q3 MECHANICS
Fluids Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.3390/fluids8100280
Andrey Gavrilov, Yaroslav Ignatenko
{"title":"Re = 10,000时Taylor-Couette-Poiseuille流动的数值模拟","authors":"Andrey Gavrilov, Yaroslav Ignatenko","doi":"10.3390/fluids8100280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fully developed turbulent flow in a concentric annulus, Re =10,000, ri/ro=0.5, with an inner rotating cylinder in the velocity range N=Uω/Ub=0÷4, is studied via a large-eddy simulation. Also, for comparison, simulations by steady-state, unstatiounary RANS k-ω SST (URANS), and Elliptic Blending Model (EBM) were made. The main focus of this study is on the effect of high rotation on the mean flow, turbulence statistics, and vortex structure. Distribution of the tangential velocity and the Reynolds stress tensor change their behaviour at N>0.5∼1. With rotation increases, the production of tangential fluctuation becomes dominant over axial ones and the position of turbulent kinetic energy maximum shifts towards the wall into the buffer zone. URANS and EBM approaches show good agreement with LES in mean flow, turbulent statistics, and integral parameters. The difference in pressure loss prediction between LES and URANS does not exceed 20%, but the average difference is about 11%. The EBM approach underestimates pressure losses up to 9% and on average not more than 5%. Vortex structures are described well by URANS.","PeriodicalId":12397,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Simulation of Taylor—Couette—Poiseuille Flow at Re = 10,000\",\"authors\":\"Andrey Gavrilov, Yaroslav Ignatenko\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/fluids8100280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A fully developed turbulent flow in a concentric annulus, Re =10,000, ri/ro=0.5, with an inner rotating cylinder in the velocity range N=Uω/Ub=0÷4, is studied via a large-eddy simulation. Also, for comparison, simulations by steady-state, unstatiounary RANS k-ω SST (URANS), and Elliptic Blending Model (EBM) were made. The main focus of this study is on the effect of high rotation on the mean flow, turbulence statistics, and vortex structure. Distribution of the tangential velocity and the Reynolds stress tensor change their behaviour at N>0.5∼1. With rotation increases, the production of tangential fluctuation becomes dominant over axial ones and the position of turbulent kinetic energy maximum shifts towards the wall into the buffer zone. URANS and EBM approaches show good agreement with LES in mean flow, turbulent statistics, and integral parameters. The difference in pressure loss prediction between LES and URANS does not exceed 20%, but the average difference is about 11%. The EBM approach underestimates pressure losses up to 9% and on average not more than 5%. Vortex structures are described well by URANS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluids\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids8100280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids8100280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过大涡模拟,研究了Re = 10000, ri/ro=0.5,内旋圆柱在速度范围N=Uω/Ub=0÷4内充分发展的同心环空湍流。同时,通过稳态、非稳态RANS k-ω SST (URANS)和椭圆混合模型(EBM)进行了仿真比较。本研究的主要重点是高旋转对平均流量、湍流统计和涡结构的影响。切向速度和雷诺应力张量的分布在N>0.5 ~ 1时改变了它们的行为。随着旋转的增加,切向波动的产生比轴向波动的产生更占优势,湍流动能的最大位置向壁面移向缓冲区。URANS和EBM方法在平均流量、湍流统计和积分参数方面与LES方法一致。LES和URANS在压力损失预测上的差异不超过20%,但平均差值在11%左右。EBM方法将压力损失低估了9%,平均不超过5%。URANS很好地描述了涡旋结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Simulation of Taylor—Couette—Poiseuille Flow at Re = 10,000
A fully developed turbulent flow in a concentric annulus, Re =10,000, ri/ro=0.5, with an inner rotating cylinder in the velocity range N=Uω/Ub=0÷4, is studied via a large-eddy simulation. Also, for comparison, simulations by steady-state, unstatiounary RANS k-ω SST (URANS), and Elliptic Blending Model (EBM) were made. The main focus of this study is on the effect of high rotation on the mean flow, turbulence statistics, and vortex structure. Distribution of the tangential velocity and the Reynolds stress tensor change their behaviour at N>0.5∼1. With rotation increases, the production of tangential fluctuation becomes dominant over axial ones and the position of turbulent kinetic energy maximum shifts towards the wall into the buffer zone. URANS and EBM approaches show good agreement with LES in mean flow, turbulent statistics, and integral parameters. The difference in pressure loss prediction between LES and URANS does not exceed 20%, but the average difference is about 11%. The EBM approach underestimates pressure losses up to 9% and on average not more than 5%. Vortex structures are described well by URANS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fluids
Fluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
326
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信