昴:血清蛋白被用于快速检测流发数据

Karger Kompass Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1159/000534462
Franz Stanzel
{"title":"昴:血清蛋白被用于快速检测流发数据","authors":"Franz Stanzel","doi":"10.1159/000534462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> While Light’s criteria exhibit high sensitivity (98%) in detecting exudative pleural effusions, the capacity to rule out transudates is relatively limited. A previous study showed that approximately one-fifth of patients with congestive cardiac failure on diuretics also met the criteria for exudate. This study compares the diagnostic value of Light’s criteria, the serum-effusion albumin gradient (SEAG) method, and pleural effusion glucose levels for accurately categorizing pleural effusion as transudate or exudate. <b>Methodology:</b> We conducted this cross-sectional observational study in a tertiary care hospital in Ahmedabad, India. Two hundred patients with pleural effusion undergoing thoracentesis were included. Laboratory parameters measured in pleural fluid analysis included pleural fluid protein, pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), pleural fluid albumin, and pleural fluid glucose. Serum protein, serum LDH, and serum albumin were also collected. Mean values and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for analysis. <b>Results:</b> A significant difference was observed in the mean value of exudative and transudative effusions for each parameter (pleural fluid protein/serum fluid protein ratio, pleural fluid LDH/serum fluid LDH ratio, pleural fluid LDH, SEAG, and pleural fluid glucose) (<i>P</i> &amp;#x3c; 0.001). Light’s criteria demonstrated the highest efficacy in diagnosing exudates (accuracy = 97.50%), while SEAG demonstrated the highest efficacy in diagnosing transudates (accuracy = 97.50%).","PeriodicalId":477056,"journal":{"name":"Karger Kompass","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pleuraergüsse: Serum-Erguss-Albumin-Gradient ermöglicht die schnelle Erkennung von Transsudaten\",\"authors\":\"Franz Stanzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<b>Introduction:</b> While Light’s criteria exhibit high sensitivity (98%) in detecting exudative pleural effusions, the capacity to rule out transudates is relatively limited. A previous study showed that approximately one-fifth of patients with congestive cardiac failure on diuretics also met the criteria for exudate. This study compares the diagnostic value of Light’s criteria, the serum-effusion albumin gradient (SEAG) method, and pleural effusion glucose levels for accurately categorizing pleural effusion as transudate or exudate. <b>Methodology:</b> We conducted this cross-sectional observational study in a tertiary care hospital in Ahmedabad, India. Two hundred patients with pleural effusion undergoing thoracentesis were included. Laboratory parameters measured in pleural fluid analysis included pleural fluid protein, pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), pleural fluid albumin, and pleural fluid glucose. Serum protein, serum LDH, and serum albumin were also collected. Mean values and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for analysis. <b>Results:</b> A significant difference was observed in the mean value of exudative and transudative effusions for each parameter (pleural fluid protein/serum fluid protein ratio, pleural fluid LDH/serum fluid LDH ratio, pleural fluid LDH, SEAG, and pleural fluid glucose) (<i>P</i> &amp;#x3c; 0.001). Light’s criteria demonstrated the highest efficacy in diagnosing exudates (accuracy = 97.50%), while SEAG demonstrated the highest efficacy in diagnosing transudates (accuracy = 97.50%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":477056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karger Kompass\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karger Kompass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karger Kompass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

& lt; b>介绍:& lt; / b>虽然Light的标准在检测渗出性胸腔积液方面表现出很高的灵敏度(98%),但排除渗出物的能力相对有限。先前的一项研究表明,大约五分之一的使用利尿剂的充血性心力衰竭患者也符合渗出物的标准。本研究比较了Light标准、血清积液白蛋白梯度(SEAG)法和胸腔积液葡萄糖水平对准确分类胸腔积液为渗出液或渗出液的诊断价值。& lt; b>方法:& lt; / b>我们在印度艾哈迈达巴德的一家三级保健医院进行了这项横断面观察研究。200例胸腔积液患者接受胸腔穿刺。在胸腔液分析中测量的实验室参数包括胸腔液蛋白、胸腔液乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、胸腔液白蛋白和胸腔液葡萄糖。同时采集血清蛋白、LDH、白蛋白。计算平均值和标准差(sd)进行分析。& lt; b>结果:& lt; / b>各参数(胸液蛋白/血清蛋白比、胸液LDH/血清LDH比、胸液LDH、SEAG和胸液葡萄糖)的渗出液和转诊液的平均值有显著差异(<i>P</i>, # x3c;0.001)。Light的诊断标准对渗出液的诊断效率最高(准确率为97.50%),SEAG对渗出液的诊断效率最高(准确率为97.50%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pleuraergüsse: Serum-Erguss-Albumin-Gradient ermöglicht die schnelle Erkennung von Transsudaten
Introduction: While Light’s criteria exhibit high sensitivity (98%) in detecting exudative pleural effusions, the capacity to rule out transudates is relatively limited. A previous study showed that approximately one-fifth of patients with congestive cardiac failure on diuretics also met the criteria for exudate. This study compares the diagnostic value of Light’s criteria, the serum-effusion albumin gradient (SEAG) method, and pleural effusion glucose levels for accurately categorizing pleural effusion as transudate or exudate. Methodology: We conducted this cross-sectional observational study in a tertiary care hospital in Ahmedabad, India. Two hundred patients with pleural effusion undergoing thoracentesis were included. Laboratory parameters measured in pleural fluid analysis included pleural fluid protein, pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), pleural fluid albumin, and pleural fluid glucose. Serum protein, serum LDH, and serum albumin were also collected. Mean values and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for analysis. Results: A significant difference was observed in the mean value of exudative and transudative effusions for each parameter (pleural fluid protein/serum fluid protein ratio, pleural fluid LDH/serum fluid LDH ratio, pleural fluid LDH, SEAG, and pleural fluid glucose) (P &#x3c; 0.001). Light’s criteria demonstrated the highest efficacy in diagnosing exudates (accuracy = 97.50%), while SEAG demonstrated the highest efficacy in diagnosing transudates (accuracy = 97.50%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信