代谢综合征不同定义的比较及其与非酒精性脂肪性肝病的关系:一项回顾性研究

Carmen Tse, Nicholas Lisanti, Micah Grubert Van Iderstine, Julia Uhanova, Gerald Minuk, Nabiha Faisal
{"title":"代谢综合征不同定义的比较及其与非酒精性脂肪性肝病的关系:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Carmen Tse, Nicholas Lisanti, Micah Grubert Van Iderstine, Julia Uhanova, Gerald Minuk, Nabiha Faisal","doi":"10.3138/canlivj-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is considered an important risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of MetS based on six different MetS definitions and compare the performance of various definitions for identifying diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia among NAFLD patients. Methods: The definitions compared were those developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI), and Interim Joint Statement “Harmonized” criteria. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the six MetS definitions with NAFLD diagnosis. The diagnosis for NAFLD was established based on liver imaging or biopsy compatible with fatty liver disease. Results: A total of 500 NAFLD patients were analyzed. The mean age was 61.2 ± 13.2 years, and BMI was 32.7 ± 8.0 kg/m 2 . The most prevalent MetS component was dyslipidemia 83%, followed by hypertension 60%, obesity 61%, and diabetes 57%. The prevalence of MetS according to the WHO, NCEP/ATP-III, IDF, AACE, AHA/NHLBI, and harmonized criteria was 69%, 59%, 54%, 64%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diabetes and hypertension was with the WHO definition (0.7405) and (0.8120), respectively. Conclusions: The prevalence of MetS in NAFLD patients varies according to the definitions of MetS employed. The modified WHO definition appeared to be most useful for the screening of MetS in NAFLD patients.","PeriodicalId":9527,"journal":{"name":"Canadian liver journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different definitions of metabolic syndrome and their associations with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Tse, Nicholas Lisanti, Micah Grubert Van Iderstine, Julia Uhanova, Gerald Minuk, Nabiha Faisal\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/canlivj-2023-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is considered an important risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of MetS based on six different MetS definitions and compare the performance of various definitions for identifying diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia among NAFLD patients. Methods: The definitions compared were those developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI), and Interim Joint Statement “Harmonized” criteria. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the six MetS definitions with NAFLD diagnosis. The diagnosis for NAFLD was established based on liver imaging or biopsy compatible with fatty liver disease. Results: A total of 500 NAFLD patients were analyzed. The mean age was 61.2 ± 13.2 years, and BMI was 32.7 ± 8.0 kg/m 2 . The most prevalent MetS component was dyslipidemia 83%, followed by hypertension 60%, obesity 61%, and diabetes 57%. The prevalence of MetS according to the WHO, NCEP/ATP-III, IDF, AACE, AHA/NHLBI, and harmonized criteria was 69%, 59%, 54%, 64%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diabetes and hypertension was with the WHO definition (0.7405) and (0.8120), respectively. Conclusions: The prevalence of MetS in NAFLD patients varies according to the definitions of MetS employed. The modified WHO definition appeared to be most useful for the screening of MetS in NAFLD patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian liver journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian liver journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2023-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian liver journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2023-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:代谢综合征(MetS)被认为是非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的重要危险因素。本研究的目的是基于六种不同的MetS定义来测量MetS的患病率,并比较不同定义在NAFLD患者中识别糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常的性能。方法:比较世界卫生组织(WHO)、国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组III (NCEP-ATP III)、国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)、美国临床内分泌学家协会(AACE)、美国心脏协会/国家心肺血液研究所(AHA/NHLBI)和临时联合声明“协调”标准制定的定义。绘制了NAFLD诊断的6种MetS定义的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。NAFLD的诊断是基于与脂肪肝相容的肝脏影像学或活检。结果:共分析了500例NAFLD患者。平均年龄61.2±13.2岁,BMI 32.7±8.0 kg/ m2。最常见的代谢代谢成分是血脂异常83%,其次是高血压60%,肥胖61%,糖尿病57%。根据WHO、NCEP/ATP-III、IDF、AACE、AHA/NHLBI和协调标准,met的患病率分别为69%、59%、54%、64%、78%和79%。糖尿病和高血压患者工作特征曲线下的最高面积分别为(0.7405)和(0.8120)。结论:NAFLD患者中MetS的流行程度因MetS的定义而异。修订后的WHO定义似乎对NAFLD患者的met筛查最有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of different definitions of metabolic syndrome and their associations with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a retrospective study
Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is considered an important risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of MetS based on six different MetS definitions and compare the performance of various definitions for identifying diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia among NAFLD patients. Methods: The definitions compared were those developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III), International Diabetes Federation (IDF), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI), and Interim Joint Statement “Harmonized” criteria. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the six MetS definitions with NAFLD diagnosis. The diagnosis for NAFLD was established based on liver imaging or biopsy compatible with fatty liver disease. Results: A total of 500 NAFLD patients were analyzed. The mean age was 61.2 ± 13.2 years, and BMI was 32.7 ± 8.0 kg/m 2 . The most prevalent MetS component was dyslipidemia 83%, followed by hypertension 60%, obesity 61%, and diabetes 57%. The prevalence of MetS according to the WHO, NCEP/ATP-III, IDF, AACE, AHA/NHLBI, and harmonized criteria was 69%, 59%, 54%, 64%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diabetes and hypertension was with the WHO definition (0.7405) and (0.8120), respectively. Conclusions: The prevalence of MetS in NAFLD patients varies according to the definitions of MetS employed. The modified WHO definition appeared to be most useful for the screening of MetS in NAFLD patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信