{"title":"B型主动脉夹层血管内修复的早期和中期结果:单一三级中心经验","authors":"Gorkem Yigit, Gokay Deniz, Sabir Hasanzade, Murat Gevrek, Ayla Ece Celikten, Naim Boran Tumer, Anıl Özen, Hakki Zafer Iscan","doi":"10.9739/tjvs.2023.07.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The utility of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Type B Aortic dissections (TBAD) continues to advance at a growing rate. The purpose of this research was to investigate our management strategy and early-mid-term outcomes of endovascular procedures for TBAD, in a single tertiary center. Material and Methods: Sixty-six eligible TBAD patients (2 hyperacute complicated, 12 acute complicated and 52 uncomplicated) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 2016 and January 2023. The endpoints of the study were technical success, early and late morbidity and mortality, reinterventions throughout the follow-up period, as well as late open conversion. Results: Technical success was achieved in all cases. Early mortality was seen in only 3 patients (4.5%). Only patients with one hyperacute and two acute complicated TBAD (cTBAD) had early death. There was one late mortality in an acute cTBAD patient, who developed retrograde type A dissection two months after TEVAR. The median follow-up period was 26.1±13.7 months. Six reinterventions were performed for extension of dissection or covering the entries distally (9.1%). No endoleak, graft infection or migration were observed. Open surgical repair was performed; however, the patient did not survive. Conclusion: Early results of TEVAR in elective TBAD is trouble-free. Carrying the patients to the subacute phase seems to be the most suitable timing for TEVAR. Anti-stimulus and anti-hypertensive treatment with surveillance programme is mandatory for this patient cohort. Pre-emptive TEVAR has satisfactory results; however, long-term results are mandatory for further recommendations.","PeriodicalId":23982,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"41 1‐2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early and mid-term results of endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections: A single tertiary center experience\",\"authors\":\"Gorkem Yigit, Gokay Deniz, Sabir Hasanzade, Murat Gevrek, Ayla Ece Celikten, Naim Boran Tumer, Anıl Özen, Hakki Zafer Iscan\",\"doi\":\"10.9739/tjvs.2023.07.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The utility of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Type B Aortic dissections (TBAD) continues to advance at a growing rate. The purpose of this research was to investigate our management strategy and early-mid-term outcomes of endovascular procedures for TBAD, in a single tertiary center. Material and Methods: Sixty-six eligible TBAD patients (2 hyperacute complicated, 12 acute complicated and 52 uncomplicated) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 2016 and January 2023. The endpoints of the study were technical success, early and late morbidity and mortality, reinterventions throughout the follow-up period, as well as late open conversion. Results: Technical success was achieved in all cases. Early mortality was seen in only 3 patients (4.5%). Only patients with one hyperacute and two acute complicated TBAD (cTBAD) had early death. There was one late mortality in an acute cTBAD patient, who developed retrograde type A dissection two months after TEVAR. The median follow-up period was 26.1±13.7 months. Six reinterventions were performed for extension of dissection or covering the entries distally (9.1%). No endoleak, graft infection or migration were observed. Open surgical repair was performed; however, the patient did not survive. Conclusion: Early results of TEVAR in elective TBAD is trouble-free. Carrying the patients to the subacute phase seems to be the most suitable timing for TEVAR. Anti-stimulus and anti-hypertensive treatment with surveillance programme is mandatory for this patient cohort. Pre-emptive TEVAR has satisfactory results; however, long-term results are mandatory for further recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 1‐2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2023.07.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9739/tjvs.2023.07.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Early and mid-term results of endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections: A single tertiary center experience
Aim: The utility of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Type B Aortic dissections (TBAD) continues to advance at a growing rate. The purpose of this research was to investigate our management strategy and early-mid-term outcomes of endovascular procedures for TBAD, in a single tertiary center. Material and Methods: Sixty-six eligible TBAD patients (2 hyperacute complicated, 12 acute complicated and 52 uncomplicated) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective cohort study between January 2016 and January 2023. The endpoints of the study were technical success, early and late morbidity and mortality, reinterventions throughout the follow-up period, as well as late open conversion. Results: Technical success was achieved in all cases. Early mortality was seen in only 3 patients (4.5%). Only patients with one hyperacute and two acute complicated TBAD (cTBAD) had early death. There was one late mortality in an acute cTBAD patient, who developed retrograde type A dissection two months after TEVAR. The median follow-up period was 26.1±13.7 months. Six reinterventions were performed for extension of dissection or covering the entries distally (9.1%). No endoleak, graft infection or migration were observed. Open surgical repair was performed; however, the patient did not survive. Conclusion: Early results of TEVAR in elective TBAD is trouble-free. Carrying the patients to the subacute phase seems to be the most suitable timing for TEVAR. Anti-stimulus and anti-hypertensive treatment with surveillance programme is mandatory for this patient cohort. Pre-emptive TEVAR has satisfactory results; however, long-term results are mandatory for further recommendations.