COVID-19大流行期间儿科患者的睡眠医学实践

Birce Sunman, Nagehan Emiralioğlu, Beste Özsezen, Dilber Ademhan Tural, Halime Nayir Büyükşahin, İsmail Güzelkaş, Ebru Yalçın, Deniz Doğru, Nural Kiper, Uğur Özçelik
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间儿科患者的睡眠医学实践","authors":"Birce Sunman, Nagehan Emiralioğlu, Beste Özsezen, Dilber Ademhan Tural, Halime Nayir Büyükşahin, İsmail Güzelkaş, Ebru Yalçın, Deniz Doğru, Nural Kiper, Uğur Özçelik","doi":"10.32552/2023.actamedica.764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic required precautions for infection control in sleep centers. Our aim was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sleep medicine practices. Methods: Data of patients undergoing polysomnography and positive airway pressure titration studies prior to (2019) and during the pandemic (2020) were analyzed. In addition, the effect of taking appropriate precautions and performing SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing on the safety of sleep medicine practices was investigated. Results: The median age of the patients who underwent sleep studies (polysomnography + positive airway pressure titration studies) in 2019 was 7 (2.5-11.5) years (164 male, 147 female), whilst it was 9 (4-12) years (127 male, 84 female) in 2020. During the outbreak, the frequency of sleep studies increased from 3% (311 tests/10068 total number of outpatient visits in 2019) to 3.7% (211 tests/5666 in 2020). In contrast, the frequency of positive airway pressure titration studies declined from 31.8% (99 positive airway pressure titration studies/311 sleep studies) to 21.8% (46 positive airway pressure titration studies/211 sleep studies) in 2020 compared to 2019. Down syndrome was found to be the most common indication both in 2019 (20.9% of all tests) and 2020 (13.7%). Conclusions: Polysomnographies were performed at a high rate despite the pandemic. However, positive airway pressure titration studies were avoided except for urgent indications because of the potential for aerosolization. In this study, it was shown that sleep studies can be performed safely when necessary precautions are taken.","PeriodicalId":7100,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep medicine practices in pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Birce Sunman, Nagehan Emiralioğlu, Beste Özsezen, Dilber Ademhan Tural, Halime Nayir Büyükşahin, İsmail Güzelkaş, Ebru Yalçın, Deniz Doğru, Nural Kiper, Uğur Özçelik\",\"doi\":\"10.32552/2023.actamedica.764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic required precautions for infection control in sleep centers. Our aim was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sleep medicine practices. Methods: Data of patients undergoing polysomnography and positive airway pressure titration studies prior to (2019) and during the pandemic (2020) were analyzed. In addition, the effect of taking appropriate precautions and performing SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing on the safety of sleep medicine practices was investigated. Results: The median age of the patients who underwent sleep studies (polysomnography + positive airway pressure titration studies) in 2019 was 7 (2.5-11.5) years (164 male, 147 female), whilst it was 9 (4-12) years (127 male, 84 female) in 2020. During the outbreak, the frequency of sleep studies increased from 3% (311 tests/10068 total number of outpatient visits in 2019) to 3.7% (211 tests/5666 in 2020). In contrast, the frequency of positive airway pressure titration studies declined from 31.8% (99 positive airway pressure titration studies/311 sleep studies) to 21.8% (46 positive airway pressure titration studies/211 sleep studies) in 2020 compared to 2019. Down syndrome was found to be the most common indication both in 2019 (20.9% of all tests) and 2020 (13.7%). Conclusions: Polysomnographies were performed at a high rate despite the pandemic. However, positive airway pressure titration studies were avoided except for urgent indications because of the potential for aerosolization. In this study, it was shown that sleep studies can be performed safely when necessary precautions are taken.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medica\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32552/2023.actamedica.764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32552/2023.actamedica.764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:COVID-19大流行要求睡眠中心采取感染控制措施。我们的目的是评估COVID-19大流行对睡眠医学实践的影响。方法:分析疫情前(2019年)和疫情期间(2020年)接受多导睡眠图和气道正压滴定研究的患者数据。此外,还调查了采取适当的预防措施和进行SARS-CoV-2聚合酶链反应检测对睡眠医学实践安全性的影响。结果:2019年接受睡眠研究(多导睡眠图+气道正压滴定研究)的患者年龄中位数为7(2.5-11.5)岁(男性164人,女性147人),2020年为9(4-12)岁(男性127人,女性84人)。在疫情爆发期间,睡眠研究的频率从3%(2019年311次/10068次门诊总次数)增加到3.7%(2020年211次/5666次)。相比之下,与2019年相比,2020年气道正压滴定研究的频率从31.8%(99项气道正压滴定研究/311项睡眠研究)下降到21.8%(46项气道正压滴定研究/211项睡眠研究)。唐氏综合症是2019年(占所有检查的20.9%)和2020年(13.7%)最常见的适应症。结论:尽管大流行,多导睡眠描记术的执行率很高。然而,由于潜在的雾化,除紧急适应症外,避免气道正压滴定研究。这项研究表明,在采取必要的预防措施的情况下,睡眠研究是可以安全进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sleep medicine practices in pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic required precautions for infection control in sleep centers. Our aim was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sleep medicine practices. Methods: Data of patients undergoing polysomnography and positive airway pressure titration studies prior to (2019) and during the pandemic (2020) were analyzed. In addition, the effect of taking appropriate precautions and performing SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing on the safety of sleep medicine practices was investigated. Results: The median age of the patients who underwent sleep studies (polysomnography + positive airway pressure titration studies) in 2019 was 7 (2.5-11.5) years (164 male, 147 female), whilst it was 9 (4-12) years (127 male, 84 female) in 2020. During the outbreak, the frequency of sleep studies increased from 3% (311 tests/10068 total number of outpatient visits in 2019) to 3.7% (211 tests/5666 in 2020). In contrast, the frequency of positive airway pressure titration studies declined from 31.8% (99 positive airway pressure titration studies/311 sleep studies) to 21.8% (46 positive airway pressure titration studies/211 sleep studies) in 2020 compared to 2019. Down syndrome was found to be the most common indication both in 2019 (20.9% of all tests) and 2020 (13.7%). Conclusions: Polysomnographies were performed at a high rate despite the pandemic. However, positive airway pressure titration studies were avoided except for urgent indications because of the potential for aerosolization. In this study, it was shown that sleep studies can be performed safely when necessary precautions are taken.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信