代表、参与和影响:比较美国原住民的倡导与联邦层面有组织的利益

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Kirsten Matoy Carlson
{"title":"代表、参与和影响:比较美国原住民的倡导与联邦层面有组织的利益","authors":"Kirsten Matoy Carlson","doi":"10.1080/03623319.2023.2215119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"American Indians occupy a unique space in U.S. politics because they act as governments, businesses, and citizen groups. Yet studies of organized interests and intergovernmental lobbies rarely mention them. This study draws on original research on reported lobbying, reported lobbying expenditures, and advocacy efforts by tribal governments and organizations at the congressional hearing level. It compsares lobbying, lobbying expenditures, and congressional testimony by American Indians to that of organized interests and state and local governments to determine how well represented and successful Natives are in the legislative process. It finds that tribal governments and Native organizations lobby extensively on Indian affairs but constitute only a small portion of all lobbying, spend considerably less on lobbying than businesses and trade associations, and experience the most success in the legislative process when they unify in opposition to federal legislation.","PeriodicalId":51477,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation, participation, and influence: Comparing Native American advocacy with organized interests at the federal level\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Matoy Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03623319.2023.2215119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"American Indians occupy a unique space in U.S. politics because they act as governments, businesses, and citizen groups. Yet studies of organized interests and intergovernmental lobbies rarely mention them. This study draws on original research on reported lobbying, reported lobbying expenditures, and advocacy efforts by tribal governments and organizations at the congressional hearing level. It compsares lobbying, lobbying expenditures, and congressional testimony by American Indians to that of organized interests and state and local governments to determine how well represented and successful Natives are in the legislative process. It finds that tribal governments and Native organizations lobby extensively on Indian affairs but constitute only a small portion of all lobbying, spend considerably less on lobbying than businesses and trade associations, and experience the most success in the legislative process when they unify in opposition to federal legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2023.2215119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2023.2215119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国印第安人在美国政治中占有独特的地位,因为他们既是政府、企业,也是公民团体。然而,对有组织利益集团和政府间游说集团的研究很少提及它们。本研究借鉴了对报告的游说、报告的游说支出以及部落政府和组织在国会听证会层面的倡导努力的原始研究。它将美国印第安人的游说、游说支出和国会证词与有组织的利益集团、州和地方政府的证词进行比较,以确定印第安人在立法过程中的代表性和成功程度。研究发现,部落政府和土著组织在印第安事务上进行了广泛的游说,但只占所有游说活动的一小部分,在游说上的花费比企业和贸易协会要少得多,而且当他们联合起来反对联邦立法时,在立法过程中取得的成功最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Representation, participation, and influence: Comparing Native American advocacy with organized interests at the federal level
American Indians occupy a unique space in U.S. politics because they act as governments, businesses, and citizen groups. Yet studies of organized interests and intergovernmental lobbies rarely mention them. This study draws on original research on reported lobbying, reported lobbying expenditures, and advocacy efforts by tribal governments and organizations at the congressional hearing level. It compsares lobbying, lobbying expenditures, and congressional testimony by American Indians to that of organized interests and state and local governments to determine how well represented and successful Natives are in the legislative process. It finds that tribal governments and Native organizations lobby extensively on Indian affairs but constitute only a small portion of all lobbying, spend considerably less on lobbying than businesses and trade associations, and experience the most success in the legislative process when they unify in opposition to federal legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science Journal
Social Science Journal SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Social Science Journal is the official journal of the Western Social Science Association. The principal purpose of the journal is to publish scholarly work in the social sciences defined in the classical sense, that is in the social sciences, the humanities, and the natural sciences. The research that is published may take a theoretical or speculative model as well as statistical and mathematical. Contributions are welcome from all fields which have relevant and insightful comments to make about the social sciences. The journal also includes a Research Note section which is devoted to supporting scholarly research that is in progress. The journal has a well-established book review section which reflects the academic and intellectual diversity within the WSSA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信