深度学习模型在癫痫发作检测中的比较分析

Belal Arshad, Atin Mukherjee
{"title":"深度学习模型在癫痫发作检测中的比较分析","authors":"Belal Arshad, Atin Mukherjee","doi":"10.15864/ajac.21016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electroencephalogram (EEG) is used to detect epilepsy, a common neurological disorder. Neurologists visually examine EEG results to make the diagnosis. Researchers have suggested automated technologies to diagnose the seizure because traditional method are lengthy and there is a dearth of professionals everywhere. The common symptoms of seizures, which are characterized by aberrant brain activity brought on by an epileptic disease, include bewilderment, loss of awareness, and strange behaviour. Sometimes it becomes very difficult to identify the seizure in persons. So, for determining seizures there are many deep learning models have been designed. Among those, three models have been chosen and compared in this paper. These three models are, Convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), convolutional neural network-recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN), and convolutional neural network-gated recurrent unit (CNN-GRU) whose comparison study have been discussed in this paper by using three different types of optimizers, namely Rmsprop, Adam, and Nadam. After that the result of deep learning models have been compared with some previous machine learning work for the detection of epileptic seizure. Mainly three parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity and specificityof the models are found and compared to predict which model as well as which optimizer among Rmsprop, Adam and Nadam is best. For efficient removal of the features from an EEG sequence data, one dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) is created. For further extraction of temporal characteristics, the features extracted are processed by the CNN-LSTM model's LSTM layers, CNN-RNN model's RNN layers, and CNN-GRU model's GRU layers. The last epileptic seizure recognition step involves feeding the output characteristics into a number of fully connected layers. I","PeriodicalId":484753,"journal":{"name":"American journal of advanced computing","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for the Detection of Epileptic Seizure\",\"authors\":\"Belal Arshad, Atin Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.15864/ajac.21016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Electroencephalogram (EEG) is used to detect epilepsy, a common neurological disorder. Neurologists visually examine EEG results to make the diagnosis. Researchers have suggested automated technologies to diagnose the seizure because traditional method are lengthy and there is a dearth of professionals everywhere. The common symptoms of seizures, which are characterized by aberrant brain activity brought on by an epileptic disease, include bewilderment, loss of awareness, and strange behaviour. Sometimes it becomes very difficult to identify the seizure in persons. So, for determining seizures there are many deep learning models have been designed. Among those, three models have been chosen and compared in this paper. These three models are, Convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), convolutional neural network-recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN), and convolutional neural network-gated recurrent unit (CNN-GRU) whose comparison study have been discussed in this paper by using three different types of optimizers, namely Rmsprop, Adam, and Nadam. After that the result of deep learning models have been compared with some previous machine learning work for the detection of epileptic seizure. Mainly three parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity and specificityof the models are found and compared to predict which model as well as which optimizer among Rmsprop, Adam and Nadam is best. For efficient removal of the features from an EEG sequence data, one dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) is created. For further extraction of temporal characteristics, the features extracted are processed by the CNN-LSTM model's LSTM layers, CNN-RNN model's RNN layers, and CNN-GRU model's GRU layers. The last epileptic seizure recognition step involves feeding the output characteristics into a number of fully connected layers. I\",\"PeriodicalId\":484753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of advanced computing\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of advanced computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15864/ajac.21016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of advanced computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15864/ajac.21016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑电图(EEG)用于检测癫痫,一种常见的神经系统疾病。神经科医生目视检查脑电图结果作出诊断。研究人员建议使用自动化技术来诊断癫痫发作,因为传统方法耗时长,而且到处都缺乏专业人员。癫痫发作的常见症状,其特征是由癫痫引起的异常大脑活动,包括困惑,意识丧失和奇怪的行为。有时很难识别人的癫痫发作。因此,为了确定癫痫发作,已经设计了许多深度学习模型。其中,本文选取了三种模型进行了比较。这三种模型分别是卷积神经网络-长短期记忆(CNN-LSTM)、卷积神经网络-递归神经网络(CNN-RNN)和卷积神经网络-门控递归单元(CNN-GRU),本文使用Rmsprop、Adam和Nadam三种不同类型的优化器对其进行了比较研究。然后将深度学习模型的结果与之前一些用于癫痫发作检测的机器学习工作进行比较。主要对模型的精度、灵敏度和特异度三个参数进行了比较,以预测Rmsprop、Adam和Nadam中哪个模型和优化器是最好的。为了有效地去除EEG序列数据中的特征,建立了一维卷积神经网络(CNN)。为了进一步提取时间特征,对提取的特征进行CNN-LSTM模型的LSTM层、CNN-RNN模型的RNN层和CNN-GRU模型的GRU层的处理。最后的癫痫发作识别步骤包括将输出特征输入到许多完全连接的层中。我
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for the Detection of Epileptic Seizure
Electroencephalogram (EEG) is used to detect epilepsy, a common neurological disorder. Neurologists visually examine EEG results to make the diagnosis. Researchers have suggested automated technologies to diagnose the seizure because traditional method are lengthy and there is a dearth of professionals everywhere. The common symptoms of seizures, which are characterized by aberrant brain activity brought on by an epileptic disease, include bewilderment, loss of awareness, and strange behaviour. Sometimes it becomes very difficult to identify the seizure in persons. So, for determining seizures there are many deep learning models have been designed. Among those, three models have been chosen and compared in this paper. These three models are, Convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), convolutional neural network-recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN), and convolutional neural network-gated recurrent unit (CNN-GRU) whose comparison study have been discussed in this paper by using three different types of optimizers, namely Rmsprop, Adam, and Nadam. After that the result of deep learning models have been compared with some previous machine learning work for the detection of epileptic seizure. Mainly three parameters such as accuracy, sensitivity and specificityof the models are found and compared to predict which model as well as which optimizer among Rmsprop, Adam and Nadam is best. For efficient removal of the features from an EEG sequence data, one dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) is created. For further extraction of temporal characteristics, the features extracted are processed by the CNN-LSTM model's LSTM layers, CNN-RNN model's RNN layers, and CNN-GRU model's GRU layers. The last epileptic seizure recognition step involves feeding the output characteristics into a number of fully connected layers. I
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信